- 最后登录
- 2013-3-16
- 在线时间
- 43 小时
- 寄托币
- 390
- 声望
- 3
- 注册时间
- 2007-3-16
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 390
- UID
- 2314730
- 声望
- 3
- 寄托币
- 390
- 注册时间
- 2007-3-16
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
希望大家猛拍,不要手下留情,对于昨天给我提出很多建议的朋友表示感谢!
TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 564 TIME: 00:45:00 DATE: 2007-7-31 上午 10:38:39
提纲:1:提出观点, 艺术家和评论家有各自的优点,需要寻找平衡。
2:评论家的好处,能够帮助我们理解艺术更加容易而且能帮助我们去其糟粕取其精华。举凡高的例子和现代社会大量的出版物。
3:近一步分析评论家和艺术家通力合作,能够取得更多的成果。事物需要多方面的看问题
4:艺术家的作用是无可替代的,由于他们独特的阅历与智慧。据Einstein and Beethoven.
5: 总结,艺术家和评论家不可或缺,社会正式由于他们的两者而更加繁荣和活力。
Whether the artists or the critics give society anything of lasting value? It is hard to say, because they are all useful and indispensable to our society. In my view, we should call for balance between the artists and critics in order to make our society fraught with more permanent value.
Admittedly, the critics can help us understand the works of art more easily and save our invaluable time. As we all know, who wants to interpret and have the insight about the works of art must know art and the experience of the artists as much as possible. Unfortunately, we don't have much time and energy to master it. However, we can understand the arts more deeply by the way of critics, who are familiar with the idiosyncratic area of the art that a layperson doesn’t know. For example, Van Gogh’s arts are too obscurity to understand, nevertheless, the critics can tell us how to appreciate them and then we can understand them more easily. In addition, today society are full of many publications, such as paintings, movies, books and so forth, hard to identify which are elite at a short time. At this time, the critic can tell us whether the arts are worth seeing. So we can save more time to do what I want to do. Consequently, the critic is necessary to our society.
Moreover, the critics can give the benefic feedbacks to the artists who need different opinion in order to make their arts more perfect. Nobody can deny that there isn’t the same thinking in this world, so a people perspective may give another people a different and new angle of view. Many things should be seen from many facets in order to understand the things more accurately. Of course, the critic can give more information to the artists because of the deep understanding the arts' background and spirit. Then, the artists utilize the feedbacks to rethink the arts and make the arts better. Therefore, artist can make more progresses by cooperation with the critics.
The artists play a vital role in creation and the dramatic progress of art, which can’t be replaced by the critics. From Beethoven to Einstein, there are little art created by the critics but by the artists. An artist called an artist can create something that the world doesn't exist. So our human history has a variety of new things which become to our human's fortune. Becaue the artists have their special experience, extraordinary sight and unmatchable talent about the nature, many arts can only be done by the artists. However, these can’t be done by the critics, who can only tell the arts which parts are worth in his opinion. Without Beethoven, there won’t be the immortal symphonies in our music history; without the Einstein, there won't be the Theory of Relativity in the physics history. So the value most belongs to the artists. If there is no artist in our sociey, we'll lose many things besides beauty.
In sum, I believe the artist and the critic are all necessary to our society. Without the artist, there will be no art in our history; without the critic, we will lose many progresses and waste much beauty and time. So the critic and the artist work together to make the works of art better, then give our society more something of lasting value.
[ 本帖最后由 ambitionxx 于 2007-7-31 17:11 编辑 ] |
|