Argument67 ［勇往直前小组］作业 by269750640

269750640UID：2358012

In this argument, the author deduce that by closing the library in Polluxton and using the library in Castorville the economic and service could by improved. Actually, this argument is based on unsubstantiated assumptions, which undermine the conclusion.

First of all ,few complain about the service of the merged garbage collections does not necessarily means that the service of it has been vastly improved. Perhaps that there are not much complains about the separated garbage collections before merged. It also might be the case that the problems of merged garbage collections have not been found yet in such a short time. It is possible that there will be more complains about the merged garbage collections. Without providing us the detailed information of the service before the garbage collections were merged and the long time management of merged garbage collection, the author could not make a hasty conclusion that the service is improved.

Admittedly, even if the mergence of the garbage collections has been proved to be beneficial to the service and economic, it might not work in library. Although it is reported users of library in Polluxton reduced by 20 percent, this phenomenon does not necessarily means that the service of library in Polluxton is poor . Perhaps it is the convenient instruments of searching information such as internet that lead to the reduction of users in library. Different from the garbage collection, the library is more complex project to manage and government should take comprehensive considerations of the reduction of users and should not arbitrary attributes the reasons to the service of the library.

Last, suppose that we have to take some method to solve the problems of library in Polluxton in order to improve the service, the author should consider which library should be closed first but not arbitrarily chose the library in Polluxton. There is no evidence about complains about service of the library in Castorville and how many users in it. It is perhaps that the reduction of users of library in Castorville is more serious than that in Polluxton. If so, choosing library in Castorville might result in more complains and lead to the decrease of economic. It also might be the case that the library in Castorville is too far away from the place where villagers of Polluxton live. Thus only using the library in Castorville will bring people a lot of troubles to back and forth. Unless the author has taken a careful investigation of the two libraries, he/she could not decide what method should be taken in altering the situation.

In conclusion, the speaker’s assertion that closing the library in Polluxton and using the library in Castorville could serve both villages is poorly supported. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide more information about the library in both areas.