issue87 Spring-第三次作业

林周孟UID: 2341714

Issue87    “In any field of inquiry,the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries.”


Words :477    Time:120   Date :2007-11-8

Is it true that beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries,as the speaker claims?I generally concede that novice’s instinct qualities which includes creativity,imagination and the courage of challenging the existing or maybe old theories and principles will enable them contribute more to scientific research.Nevertheless,lacking of abundant knowledge,long period of experience of sicientific rerearch,and precise style of doing research of the expert,the beginner can not make much progress,let alone make important discoveries.
To begin with,the beginner is born to be fraught with completely new perspective and to be eager to discover something fresh and important.Although the novice may feel unfamiliar and even strange with the new realm of scientific research,they long for learning new knowledge and are of great energy to pursue scientific discovery.They always try their best to find out something unusual from trivial phenomenon that might easily be neglected by the expert.And then they will try to understand and explain it using their own perspective basing on their born creativity and imagination.Finally they will put their theory into practice immediately and with great enthusiasm to test whether their perspective are correct.
However,few of the important discoveries or progress are found by the novice. Admittedly,even though the beginner have good ideas,perhaps neither do they know whether their ideas have been substantiated correct or false,nor do they realize whether their ideas are of great sense or of little sense,without the guidance of the expert,who have such good qualities as knowledge,experience,and precise style towards scientific research.Thus,perhaps the novice can not find correct direction to test their assumption.In other words,perhaps they will waste a great deal of time,energy,resource,money,and even their new and may be important ideas without making any progress due to their lackness of instruction.
Therefore,the best approach for the advancement in one field of inquiry is the cooperation between the beginner and the expert.The former excels in imagination, creativity,a great amount of energy, and the courage of challenging the existing or maybe outdated theories and principles ,otherwise,the latter has advantage in knowledge,experience,and precise style towards scientific research.As a consequence,with the assistant of the novice,the expert can focus on designing a comprehensive and advanced research program,escaping from some trivial work ,such as cleaning the test tube,preparing the equipment for formal research.etc,which may cost a lot of time.And with the guidance of the expert ,the beginner can become more proficient and do their research as effectively as they could.Both of them can benefit from the collaboration and make  important discoveries.
To sum up,in general I concede the speaker’s claim insofar as the novice has such advantage as creativity,imagination and the courage of challenging the existing heories .However,the speaker overestimates the ability of the novice while overlooks the importance of affluent knowledge and experience of  the expert.In short,the cooperation between them is the best approach ,which can effectively bring about a breakthough to one field of inquiry.

lifeng_913UID: 2397925

Is it true that beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, as the speaker claims?(感觉第一句的文化没有必要,直接以I generally concede that就可以) I generally concede that novice’s instinct qualities which includes creativity, imagination and the courage of challenging the existing or maybe old theories and principles will enable them contribute more to scientific research.(good rewriting of the main topic) Nevertheless, lacking of abundant knowledge, long period of experience of scientific research, and precise style of doing research of the expert, the beginner cannot make much progress, let alone make important discoveries.(good beginning, and summary what you want to say below)(感觉此处用to begin with和上面不太连贯,不妨用admittedly比较合适,和上文的however恰好对应) To begin with, the beginner is born to be fraught with completely new perspective and to be eager to discover something fresh and important. Although the novice may feel unfamiliar and even strange with the new realm of scientific research, they long for learning new knowledge and are of great energy to pursue scientific discovery. They always try their best to find out something unusual from trivial phenomenon that might easily be neglected by the expert. Then they will try to understand and explain it using their own perspective basing on their born creativity and imagination. Finally, they will put their theory into practice immediately and with great enthusiasm to test whether their perspective are correct.(语言有些简单,适当增加高级词汇)However, few of the important discoveries or progress is found by the novice.(从逻辑上来讲,是不可以给出太肯定而又不确定的断言,可以举出很多又新生完成的科学探索与发现,强烈建议修改此处.) Admittedly, even though the beginner have good ideas, perhaps neither do they know whether their ideas have been substantiated correct or false, nor do they realize whether their ideas are of great sense or of little sense, without the guidance of the expert, who have such good qualities as knowledge, experience, and precise style towards scientific research. Thus, perhaps the novice cannot find correct direction to test their assumption. In other words, perhaps they will waste a great deal of time, energy, resource, money, and even their new and may be important ideas without making any progress due to their lack of instruction.Therefore, the best approach for the advancement in one field of inquiry is the cooperation between the beginner and the expert. The former excels in imagination, creativity, a great amount of energy, and the courage of challenging the existing or maybe outdated theories and principles, otherwise, the latter has advantage in knowledge, experience, and precise style towards scientific research. Consequently, with the assistant of the novice, the expert can focus on designing a comprehensive and advanced research program, escaping from some trivial work, such as cleaning the test tube, preparing the equipment for formal research.etc, which may cost a lot of time. Moreover, with the guidance of the expert, the beginner can become more proficient and do their research as effectively as they could. Both of them can benefit from the collaboration and make important discoveries.To sum up, in general I concede the speaker’s claim insofar as the novice has such advantage as creativity, imagination and the courage of challenging the existing theories .(此处就不必再提到作者的观点了,issue是立论性的,只需要对自己的观点进行总结即可.)However, the speaker overestimates the ability of the novice while overlooks the importance of affluent knowledge and experience of  the expert. In short, the cooperation between them is the best approach, which can effectively bring about a breakthrough to one field of inquiry.(In sum, it would be better to consider that whether creativity is more important than good experiential bases in making important discoveries, rather than to discuss whether beginners or experts are more likely to make important discoveries. It is obvious that both of them are necessary. Briefly, both beginners and experts may achieve great fruition and make immortal discoveries. It depends on the attitude towards the qualities they have.   This is my finality)

我觉得这篇Issue相比于前几篇还是很有进步的,但是与开头相比,后面的论证略失偏颇,结尾段落把握不恰,建议修改一下,而且我个人认为这个类型的issue很不好写,因为本身就存在太多争议,而使论题复杂了许多...

林周孟UID: 2341714

谢谢 lifeng_913，你的支持给了我很大的动力