Argument2【0806G-Sunbird小组】第2次作业

MusingUID: 2362177

In this argument,the author concludes that in order to enhance the property the Deerhaven Acres(DA) should follow the Brookville,
which adopt their own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting.At first glance,the author's reasoning seems to be
appealling,while clearly examining the author's reasoning,we may find that it is unconvincing.The argument contains several facets that are quertionable.

First of all,the argument concludes on a known correlation between landscaping and housepainting and tripled in property that the
latter is attributable,at least,to the former.Yet the correlation alone amounts to scant evidence of the claimed cause-and-effect
relationship.Perhaps tripled in property can be caused by other factors as well,which may include making discounts to buyers or
something benefitful to customers.Also it is possible owing to the convenient traffic which is easy for people lived there go to work.In
addition,maybe it is a coincide that the property period is equivalent to the season,the winter,and Brookville offer central heating for
free.It appears reasonable,therefore,for DA to focus on these trouble spots than to landscaping and housepainting.

Secondly,the author makes an oversimplified analogy between Brookville and DA.In order for the latter to serve as models that DA
should emulate,the DA must assume that all relevent circumstances assumptions is unwarranted.For example,the argument overlooks
the possibility that buyers would prefer Brookville to DA because of its well post-sale service or more interested in the exerior
appearence.During these seven years which is a quite a long period,buyers with latest values in DA might pursue a personality and
won't be same with others as  Brookville did.For these matters,the letter requires all the buyers in DA to paint their house in the same
color,which might causes much resistance.

Overall,the reasoning behing adopting their own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting seems logical as presented above since DA eagers to enhance the property.However,before any final decisions are made,DA should evaluate all possible alternatives and causes.

billy4everUID: 2375586

In this argument, the author concludes that in order to enhance the property the Deerhaven Acres(DA) should follow the Brookville, which adopt their own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting. At first glance, the author's reasoning seems to be appealling, while clearly examining the author's reasoning,we may find that it is unconvincing. The argument contains several facets that are quertionable 拼写错误.
(很“经典”的模板，我对模板的态度是想跳出它，却又无可奈何)

First of all, the argument concludes on a known correlation between landscaping and housepainting and tripled in property that the latter is attributable, at least, to the former. Yet the correlation alone amounts to scant evidence of the claimed cause-and-effect relationship. Perhaps tripled in property can be caused by   other factors as well, which may include making discounts to buyers or something benefitful to customers.Also it is possible owing to the convenient traffic which is easy for people lived there go to work.In
addition, maybe it is a coincide that the property period is equivalent to the season,the winter,and Brookville offer central heating for free.It appears reasonable,therefore,for DA to focus on these trouble spots than to landscaping and housepainting.

Secondly, the author makes an oversimplified analogy between Brookville and DA.我觉得错误类型不必指出，you may say the author fails to distinguish different conditions between B and DA.In order for the latter to serve as models that DA should emulate, the DA must assume that all relevent circumstances assumptions is unwarranted.For example,the argument overlooks the possibility that buyers would prefer Brookville to DA because of its well post-sale service or more interested in the exerior appearence.  During these seven years which is a quite a long period,buyers with latest values in DA might pursue a personality and
won't be same with others as  Brookville did.  For these matters,the letter requires all the buyers in DA to paint their house in the same color,which might causes much resistance.

Overall,the reasoning behing adopting their own set of restrictions on landscaping and housepainting seems logical as presented above since DA eagers to enhance the property.However,before any final decisions are made,DA should evaluate all possible alternatives and causes.
楼主的最后一段基本和我一样，看来都是出自那篇经典范文了~

Some advices:
1.Check your article in Word  to correct spelling mistakes and grammar flaws.
2.Try to use less models as possible as you can.

我的水平也仅限于此了，楼主其实写的很好，赞一个！
我的Argu2,欢迎回拍~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-761330-1-2.html