再战GRE小组大贴（欢迎加入）

songnarcissusUID: 2400363

俺也要加入，:)
         大家一起努力

david.dUID: 2375447

好像没有管理的样子啊?

kantkingUID: 2265369

申请加入！

cofeebeanUID: 2289548

第二次作战，希望加入

bryanshawUID: 2239455

我也想加入啊

winsherlyUID: 2368604

加入，刚看到，来得晚了

zhouwanqiu5UID: 2446439

这个怎么联系的啊，是在这里还是QQ
我的issue
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D1

zhouwanqiu5UID: 2446439

我也是二战，上次作文很惨，怎么互改啊，迷惑啊

zhouwanqiu5UID: 2446439

https://bbs.gter.net/post.php ... &extra=page%3D1
我现在还不知怎么彼此联系，只留了一次作业了吗

hope~~UID: 2416007

我也想加入啊!
最近一直在考试都没时间写!
第一次作业 : https://bbs.gter.net/thread-789759-1-1.html
是不是写的很烂啊!
有没有人管理这里啊!

[ 本帖最后由 hope~~ 于 2008-1-21 17:41 编辑 ]

zhouwanqiu5UID: 2446439

Argument 2

The argument suffers from several critical fallacies. The arguer recommended Deerhaven Acres (DA) to imitate Brookville community’s successful experience but the reasons he presented are not sufficient and he ignores the difference between the two areas.

First, there is no evidence to show the reason that B community’s increase in property values is attributed to the restriction on landscaping and housepainting. Without ruling out these alternatives,【不恰当没有说alternatives是什么，不能这么用吧】 it is impossible to conclude that B's tripled property values are caused by their regulations. Many other factors may be associated. For example, the commercial environment—if B is a prosperous place where marshals a lot of companies and shopping malls, the property values are certainly increased; or B is a booming traffic hub, the frequent economic trades will have effect on the property values.【有个问题考试时可以把名字缩写吗】

Even assuming that the restriction on landscaping and housepainting is the main reason that leads to the increase of B’s property values, the biggest flaw is whether there exist similarities between DA and B. Maybe DA’s condition is entirely different from B. Considering the regional difference, B is probably such a small community that the restriction is easy to conduct and the landscaped yards and the homes which have been painted the same kind of color would be very beautiful. On the contrary, DA is a large region and difficult to administer, in this case the effect will be apparently not good since the monotonic homes may make people feel antipathy【feel后面应加形容词你这是名词】.

Another factor has to be taken into consideration is the time. The restriction was taken in B seven years ago at which time the restriction was applicable. However, there are changes here and there; after seven years things will be different. People may pursue variety; the accordant exterior is probably out of date. Possibly the property values rose with the consumption level.

In sum, the DA can’t imitate B community’s experience completely, or at least the arguer should take out【改为provides】 sufficient evidence to prove that they will succeed if he takes【they take】 this action. In addition, he should listen to the residents’ recommendations, survey DA’s condition【s】, and calculate how much the increase will be, or he can’t force residents to accept the restriction.

[ 本帖最后由 wanglinnk 于 2007-12-11 12:46 编辑 ]

以后经常互改吧

cindycaoUID: 2222808

不知道现在加入这个组织晚否？

physicsNJUUID: 2440495

南京2月15日,申请加入!

抱抱熊UID: 2363068

挺好的，4月22日，南京，大家加油

andromedaUID: 2382096

南京 2月26
QQ 413989283