issue17 [0806G-desperado小组]第七次作业 by anndy

anndyUID: 2436020

TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
WORDS: 470

Outline:
1.      法律修订是权威的责任，而不是个人。可以提出异议，但不能不遵守
2.      无法简单的判断法律的公正与否
3.      如果个人不遵守其认为不公正的法律将导致严重的后果

In nowadays laws are indispensable mechanism which constituted by authorities to order our society. Considering laws' just and unjust, the speaker asserts that every individual should disobey and resist unjust laws. I don't agree with this assertion, to better present my perspective, let me illustrate it in details.

To begin with, let us consider this issue standing on the speaker's side. Since laws are constituted by persons, there must be some unjust regulations. Perhaps they are ill-considered or unsuitable with the progress of our society. So laws should be continually amended to accord with the interest of majority and to be adapted to the development of our society. However, is it the individual’s responsibility to disobey and resist unjust laws? In my eyes, it is unreasonable. If every individual has the right to oppugn laws, laws will become useless. Every individual will has their own excuse to disobey laws. In short, laws which every individual should obey can only be amended by authorities through normal step.

On the other hand, How to judge whether a law is just or unjust? For every individual's circumstance, education background, religious beliefs, and so on, vary from case to case. there will never be a unitive answer. For example, some religious think that one's life is not only belonging to oneself, so no one has the right to suicide, whereas, others have a totally opposite viewpoint. Whatever just or unjust, there is only one law of just for someone amount to unjust for others. Moreover, taking the benefit of the large society under consideration, there are also some unjust laws for some community. For instance, every country has its own impost to other country's commodities. It is unjust for any other country, which is just only for native industry. Furthermore, it is disadvantage for the development of global economy. In short, no matter for individual or the whole society, the just of laws is relatively not absolutely.

Finally, it can lead to a serious result if every individual disobey and resist unjust laws. For example, in Britain, every driver should drive on the left side of the road while drivers accustom to drive on the right side in many other countries. if a alien driver insists that the law is unjust for him, and resists it. The result is obvious. Deep down every individual is allowed to disobey and resist unjust laws, our society will become chaos. Many persons will express their dissatisfaction through bedin on the street. No body will obey the judgments of the court. Nevertheless, these behaviors are also illegal.

In sum, we can draw the conclusion that every individual should obey any laws. Because amending unjust law is the responsibility of authorities, and individual can't judge whether a law is just or unjust. If not, our society will be disordered.

绿松石UID: 2427549

In nowadays laws are indispensable mechanism which constituted by authorities to order our society. Considering laws' just and unjust, the speaker asserts that every individual should disobey and resist unjust laws. I don't agree with this assertion, to better present my perspective, let me illustrate it in details.（这个开头很简洁，我喜欢～）

To begin with, let us consider this issue standing on the speaker's side. Since laws are constituted by persons, there must be some unjust regulations. Perhaps they are ill-considered or unsuitable with the progress of our society. So laws should be continually amended to accord with the interest of majority and to be adapted to the development of our society. However, is it the individual’s responsibility to disobey and resist unjust laws? In my eyes, it is unreasonable. If every individual has the right to oppugn laws, laws will become useless. Every individual will has their own excuse to disobey laws. In short, laws which every individual should obey can only be amended by authorities through normal step.（这样写算是反证么？很独特，把文章自己的漏洞揭示出来但是有一点象argu 不知道这样写考官怎么看 但是很新颖 可以讨论下）

On the other hand, How to judge whether a law is just or unjust? For every individual's circumstance, education background, religious beliefs, and so on, vary from case to case. there will never be a unitive answer. For example, some religious think that one's life is not only belonging to oneself, so no one has the right to suicide, whereas, others have a totally opposite viewpoint. Whatever just or unjust, there is only one law of just for someone amount to unjust for others. Moreover, taking the benefit of the large society under consideration, there are also some unjust laws for some community. For instance, every country has its own impost to other country's commodities. It is unjust for any other country, which is just only for native industry. Furthermore, it is disadvantage for the development of global economy. In short, no matter for individual or the whole society, the just of laws is relatively not absolutely.

Finally, it can lead to a serious result if every individual disobey and resist unjust laws. For example, in Britain, every driver should drive on the left side of the road while drivers accustom to drive on the right side in many other countries. if a alien driver insists that the law is unjust for him, and resists it. The result is obvious. Deep down every individual is allowed to disobey and resist unjust laws, our society will become chaos. Many persons will express their dissatisfaction through bedin on the street. No body will obey the judgments of the court. Nevertheless, these behaviors are also illegal.

In sum, we can draw the conclusion that every individual should obey any laws. Because amending unjust law is the responsibility of authorities, and individual can't judge whether a law is just or unjust. If not, our society will be disordered.这篇写的很好啊～反问句用的很妙，例子也很丰富，条理清楚,内部层次也很清晰 你的文章让我读起来很轻松很舒服 不知道改挑什么错了

[ 本帖最后由 绿松石 于 2007-12-15 20:21 编辑 ]

summer330UID: 2175256

In nowadays laws are indispensable mechanism which constituted by authorities to order our society. Considering laws' just and unjust, the speaker asserts that every individual should disobey and resist unjust laws. I don't agree with this assertion, to better present my perspective, let me illustrate it in details.

To begin with, let us consider this issue standing on the speaker's side. Since laws are constituted by persons, there must be some unjust regulations. Perhaps they are ill-considered or unsuitable with the progress of our society. So laws should be continually amended to accord with the interest of majority and to be adapted to the development of our society. However, is it the individual’s responsibility to disobey and resist unjust laws? In my eyes, it is unreasonable. If every individual has the right to oppugn laws, laws will(would) become useless. （这两句中间加个联结词就更顺畅了）Every individual will has their own excuse to disobey laws. In short, laws which every individual should obey can only be amended by authorities through normal step.

On the other hand, How to judge whether a law is just or unjust? For every individual's circumstance, education background, religious beliefs, and so on, vary from case to case. there will never be a unitive answer. For example, some religious(n. or adj.? single or plural form?) think that one's life is not only belonging to oneself, so no one has the right to suicide, whereas, others have a totally opposite viewpoint. Whatever just or unjust, there is only one law of just for someone amount to(用在这里什么意思呢？) unjust for others. Moreover, taking the benefit of the large society under consideration, there are also some unjust laws for some community(_ies). For instance, every country has its own impost to other country's commodities. It is unjust for any other country, which is just only for native industry. Furthermore, it is disadvantage for the development of global economy. In short, no matter for individual or the whole society, the just of laws is relatively not absolutely.

Finally, it can lead to a serious result if every individual disobey and resist unjust laws. For example, in Britain, every driver should drive on the left side of the road while drivers accustom to drive on the right side in many other countries. if a alien driver insists that the law is unjust for him, and resists it. The result is obvious. Deep down every individual is allowed to disobey and resist unjust laws, our society will become chaos. Many persons will express their dissatisfaction through bedin on the street. No body will obey the judgments of the court. Nevertheless, these behaviors are also illegal.

In sum, we can draw the conclusion that every individual should obey any laws. Because amending unjust law is the responsibility of authorities, and individual can't judge whether a law is just or unjust. If not, our society will be disordered.（结尾感觉有点匆忙）