|
ARGUMENT28【Aero小组】第4次作业 BY BIGYAN In this argument the author concludes thata in order to improve the general music education, the Sachade need to hire Mr schade. To support this point, evident that Steel City High school has won three regional band competition under Charles Schade's management is presented. In addition, the argument reasons that the quality of the music rehearsal facilities and musical instruments at Steel City high school has improved markedly. However, there are some obvious fallacy i wantto point out in this argument. 开头写得很对味。Firsty, without considering deeply, the survey dose not provide complete information concerning the comprehensive(general) level in the region where Steel City High school stands(这一句好像没说清楚。). If (It is possible that)the other schools are not good at music education, and are poor in rehearsal. It can images that the school beated any other school easily.(这个句式。。很奇怪。) Apart from this(besides), even if they have won three times, the winning can not indicates that Charles Schade take(play an) important role in it. On the contrary, without dedication from the member of the band, it is impossible for the success in the competition. 后面的东西没有围绕中心句来写。抑或是中心句没有放在最开始。Secondly, the evident failed to ensure me that the qulity of the music rehearsal facilities and music instruments has something to do with (这个表达还有很多更书面的形式。)Charles Schade. During five years, social may has developed fastly(fast), so the instrument industry dose. (要不要倒装?)Using the enough money ,not only Steel City but also any other school can renew their instruments. So, in this case, the survey can not prove the special ability of the director ,and hiring him dose not mean the improvement of the qulity of instrument, (原文好像没有这个假设)which is able to make the result better in the competition.Finally, because of absence of the data about whether Charles Schade does well in planing and directing the programs for the entire school system or not, it is dangerous to conclude so as the argument dose. Obviously, the winning of the Steel City dose not indicates he stands out in making plan or program.Before gaining [the] farther information, I am not sure about the result of hiring him.(这个太口语化了吧。)In sum, the argument for hiring Charles Schade based on the severl fallacy statistics can not provide powerful cause. Nobody will be not sure about the result after hiring him.(这句话好纠结。) After under the suspious survey, the conclusion may fall to a pitfall unconsiously. To avoid this, only we can do is considering comprehensively and deeply.(最后一句没见过有别人这样写的。不知是否多余。) 最后一段一般是要提出一些建议。以帮助作者巩固其论证。
Argument比issue写得好。。
[ 本帖最后由 孑。。。 于 2008-1-5 21:20 编辑 ] |