- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
  
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
|显示全部楼层
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044
& n) R, L3 h0 Y) r6 t t, e b# E9 c4 u- O) Q( ~+ R: g
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
$ Y5 o) e+ L- ~- o: ^; W. E
8 ]: V W5 A4 p9 e# O3 X7 H4 YQualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 20078 z2 u- h+ y5 u
4 _) u3 [: k( F. j( h4 O
Harvard University – Architecture% h- Z& h( P% u( D! T
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture3 _$ M2 q1 X' C7 a8 @6 P" y' {7 n
and Urban Design$ v2 Y7 D$ {6 U9 D
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
* u- q! ^. N' k/ I4 |0 r; |! o• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth3 I# ~. G7 k! k' w
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought6 b7 h( U. \* ^
• Breadth of world view
+ O4 D1 e! a M3 m, [) l+ G7 ~• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice- U O* `, h. Y [
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
1 t/ _2 u$ T# U3 M• Good balance of theory and practice, very international9 n7 t) Q: e/ E: n; F
' S; ]/ t _: x4 @University of Cincinnati – Interior Design
' a8 S! U- r# v) X! U• Active connections to the profession( n$ H. V5 V. l+ q7 I* ^2 z# M' A; P
• Strength of internship program
+ i8 `3 {* O5 G$ l7 U# A• CIDA similar program/ X; x( J3 K- m* j9 p$ L
• Strong technology base
3 u$ R2 H) [0 m* T• Strong overall undergraduate program
4 Q" j; x# |' b! V3 R: I4 M( N• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior" e& F: l1 z3 R( B O- x
Design and Architecture co-op- q: S/ k9 j' g% k* O
• Excellent co-programs
2 r! ^ j" F& @• Direct competition for internships and jobs
! E# O% T+ D6 _+ C• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students
) G0 u: h$ i+ y& L5 H( J• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
4 a" y# F2 l9 W$ v l8 ?% \6 G j- n& D6 ^5 y) G; h
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture5 }% D+ g! u& k* ?8 L
• Attention to design and small town urbanism
% J7 m$ i9 f. {9 a2 P2 q3 o• Quality of faculty
. ~9 d j5 h/ C' [• Students can choose from three tracts of study
7 v7 S4 o) Z2 q0 T3 G% _5 l' l• Good design research base in sustainable design) q$ T G' ?0 S" ]2 g
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
# q0 d4 k% R9 B7 m B
: ~6 F# F4 ~. @7 m3 u+ I+ a
3 Q" E* v2 C" S! `Design Programs Most Admired( {$ N9 y* h8 l3 o7 X
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
9 D! a7 c5 }4 H* m/ M/ F9 `/ ]# v2 C, O1 k* E3 P
Architecture
" j2 Z, ?$ l4 H4 g1 Harvard University
! k9 i% ^& L$ B6 l2 Auburn University
& i: J/ g6 ?+ t' {Massachusetts Institute of Technology# k3 D. [0 A8 b5 M# W$ f* O. i0 q
4 University of Michigan
& x- f# n% C+ x8 c! F+ d C5 Columbia University
" g* _1 B9 Q9 O( n8 e6 University of Pennsylvania+ x2 j* j$ }, ]+ a
University of Virginia5 u( Y/ ~ a0 z$ I6 g! }. b
7 Cornell University* r S) W9 V2 a% X# F3 T! ^' t8 F
Georgia Institute of Technology' g9 `# B8 g" `: C% F2 w7 S& e
University of California, Berkeley- T0 C' A1 Y! t: |) q
University of Minnesota
, f# R- K( ]5 ?Yale University
- q5 v+ m- C) h( E( Z8 P- z" ~0 i$ l: b
Landscape Architecture6 u% x1 `) ?& m* f2 K3 x+ W
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada" ?: S* Z/ F5 a1 i% O
Harvard University
$ b& {" c8 t% ?. C$ [8 CUniversity of Virginia
m3 s) x3 M: \4 Pennsylvania State University
6 t1 {6 `0 J1 ?' K& f& u( E8 lUniversity of Georgia
' b9 X3 v4 p+ WUniversity of Pennsylvania! k3 p8 V) o, L3 _0 w$ n
7 California Polytechnic State University,$ s9 Y. { A R1 R( l
San Luis Obispo
: I9 L1 h( ~1 F3 K) S" @Kansas State University
6 z$ U h) j' q, N0 B& f+ GMichigan State University
2 O4 u0 v( v4 y' d+ V; eUniversity of California, Davis* f* G" A" h/ z Q1 B% w
8 w, R' v2 i1 `* B \# v
Interior Design
5 _4 S, e' C* J; r2 ]1 University of Cincinnati
) p& ?9 J; M3 E, c2 Rhode Island School of Design
2 X! j2 V$ N b! k: r V! S3 Arizona State University! @9 k( O3 P; Y5 q+ ~3 D# {, S
Cornell University
1 Q* Q- o4 D- d; u5 A$ oKansas State University
; m, K4 x5 {$ F) t6 Art Center College of Design
9 X4 |2 w' q' t# cArt Institute of Chicago9 O9 y8 j4 W+ W: S, ]+ Y
Florida State University6 ?. ]0 M7 C- b: B6 g2 y
Lawrence Technological University
0 e5 e( N' c4 L, QPratt Institute
% |5 a+ y& h6 H( K% |) [University of Oregon) n s; w) H( r% `
" K, t9 k; T" v0 f6 ~0 _DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
2 a; i+ y5 X/ S! j2 h. A7 u- Y0 y" y
UNDERGRADUATE
* x! Z* M \' c# N1 Cornell University& e, p0 Q$ R3 x7 c0 u$ I0 N8 o5 r
2 Rice University6 `. T/ e. }/ o) n
3 Syracuse University
; u2 y9 e9 v/ x, A J4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) W3 N( }# Z3 S' O9 x
5 Rhode Island School of Design7 _/ G/ Q4 G6 t7 \# q
6 Auburn University" {/ F2 Y; a9 q
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo1 @- c" t: c% }2 `- m8 e$ g
6 University of Kansas*) V ]6 ?4 R9 b& s/ I! T
9 University of Texas at Austin! a9 n r; d$ `6 {/ x* c% V9 F, R
10 Carnegie Mellon University- q0 A3 @. `. p. m, j' N
11 University of Notre Dame% I) h; v: G0 }1 Y/ p8 l
12 Kansas State University) H, w6 o; I/ T
13 Illinois Institute of Technology3 b5 @& a# Z4 [' } C% g3 d4 h
14 Iowa State University$ c8 a9 b Y+ Y4 n5 [0 w1 l! O9 [
14 Pratt Institute( q. S7 h9 |1 F' H( X5 l7 l
14 University of Oregon* k2 J6 E. K# X
14 University of Southern California
- }% d. r/ L2 P- m3 P" ?
( a$ g5 J% r: t) T# J" |DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
- l+ }4 Y% r+ g/ V6 X; [( k
6 D) ]- p( ^& qGRADUATE
0 H' L" r, I! `: y @1 Harvard University
4 i* W8 }& E6 @2 x6 v2 University of Cincinnati, s. j j4 E/ ~4 |# d. q
3 Yale University
/ ?" N+ c0 E" Z: Y( @7 z: u4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. }% \5 H% J: R7 m7 ?/ U% O5 c
5 University of Virginia- u1 C/ @6 X$ e5 d7 T% G% A& O
6 Cornell University
* {; w; t2 ]2 v. @9 I6 Rice University- G4 Z1 S7 `. p; ?
6 Washington University in St. Louis6 P+ X+ j! U3 x$ j# k! k
9 Columbia University
- f+ v% @8 R( j2 t+ D0 W10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University5 ?; n- ?" a* F$ h; s
11 Princeton University
% O; T' m5 e/ p+ ] e: r11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign* r. V( ], y* x) ^
11 University of Texas at Austin
3 }/ W3 Y' j- w' r' A( y" |14 Rhode Island School of Design
. h9 y, m [% L4 C4 L! Z( k0 C15 University of Michigan
2 P% b9 R( q, H% p- t+ _* C) B
" A( W0 O3 b; T) h; g' j/ z, K& wDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs/ o1 P# e& G+ k, H% n2 N, G
7 E) v0 v9 d- p) U- [1 r$ h
UNDERGRADUATE ( u1 L; @% E+ k) \
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
/ [$ a" X1 v) N! OCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 + L; r# ?! m! N0 Q5 f4 q4 o* L8 z
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10
7 V- P" n: p4 v& K6 s. G1 @Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 - : @" i% j+ R+ L% ^- Z. z
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14 . O' o: D9 z9 y: }2 R1 |7 e
Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
% i" f% Z7 D; E0 SAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 " A' z6 Z2 X3 d) p2 ?# y
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
! U: @5 t" N9 a6 Q) \3 G; F5 rUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
& Z1 k! @0 K6 G6 b; E$ F) O& sUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
/ s7 A4 K; @0 f- O0 ]$ c" I3 yCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -5 @# D+ [) G" T( j# L8 w, v% T
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
5 k# O4 M& q$ j8 ?Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
; L2 M/ V# d0 j4 @1 Y! X2 k! vIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -8 X" g/ J+ J0 B. J$ g2 d! J; w
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -. x# D( Q' i: N& G5 m
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -7 n7 a! t4 R% a( |3 x# j, Q
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -
# G' N j9 H, XUniversity of Southern California 14 - - - -3 B+ j! t0 X' ~+ Z" U- J/ h
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
) q& h; k1 g7 j, ?Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
8 N4 H% @( n4 w+ `: P
o3 {; s7 N0 [, p
. O$ k$ {8 j$ S7 {$ BTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007; X) L1 J8 f/ U0 _) P# f- j. n9 q
, @# ?1 G; T2 k$ P4 P9 u S6 w1 AUNDERGRADUATE
2 U/ T- G- Q( F: v3 }# h1 Louisiana State University/ D! C( c% H# w3 ?
1 Pennsylvania State University
, @- h2 e% _9 G3 Kansas State University" `& i( r* D L: _7 S
4 University of Georgia
p# f/ c% {7 {, z& W. U0 }) ]5 Ball State University
0 S- B# _7 j9 d' W4 B% H5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo/ |$ n. T- k& Q1 c' u5 [$ C4 q
5 Cornell University# J0 I5 E s I$ \
5 Purdue University
% B T! ~) v: O+ X% Z7 q+ X3 o9 Ohio State University1 ~* H1 k0 v% G$ ~& e+ G) y9 M
10 Texas A&M University
" }9 v9 X& ^" y0 H1 ?# c5 F11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona6 N5 Q! p5 R N
12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
' J0 o, A3 |6 Q! J7 ~" V13 Michigan State University; i2 V" k% F2 [& j" S
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
4 [( z' W, S2 q/ [5 o( V15 Iowa State University
|' v3 u# g' L3 }% A% W/ J1 P15 University of Oregon7 C: }0 D) Y0 u% r E# S) }9 C
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
$ u0 I9 T6 K# Z/ k: |
: A4 f: T" h' Y$ I: aTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007& G/ L* |' Y; J9 F: Y
5 Z+ L' d1 k8 J" b
GRADUATE
8 H% k) c) E3 S1 Harvard University
3 g: q) s" a0 M$ j6 C% C2 Kansas State University' N5 @2 j2 w& T" o( e
3 University of Georgia! K- R9 c8 @4 Y X: S5 g9 }. O
4 University of Pennsylvania) P4 \6 e2 w* f$ ^- n
5 Louisiana State University. B- r! M7 B$ l
6 Rhode Island School of Design$ @/ h5 P( p# \ ]! g
6 University of Michigan0 R2 p) ]- J: G8 L* O! f8 `
6 University of Virginia' A# N$ k: c0 w- h
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
& R. r, X+ N2 M# i9 Ohio State University$ c6 f1 W6 U0 ]5 g7 T- Y" H. n) |
11 Cornell University
/ l& P3 P) H+ g5 f11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
0 i& Z$ z$ t# u+ @% b0 h A/ \$ ?! b3 d13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
0 Q9 l3 k& U0 O, e13 Texas A&M University
" E/ Y4 r8 z( |4 E13 University of California, Berkeley
- F* C: ~' S* Y: V. q13 University of Oregon8 y: m' K ?; d& ^7 T
6 Z2 W7 Y2 q2 A' p5 T, d( ]Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture" b/ Z4 K7 `% }1 g) p
This ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
% g; [: a8 W8 O* U' C) j
8 g6 _% A% y6 ?# |" \Design:
# v+ b5 }2 p% J. D1 s& B* p1. Harvard University
3 E+ [# Z' Y( T( O- ~" ?2. Kansas State University
$ s$ U, O* N2 A H9 {3. Louisiana State University5 V" v7 ]( n, q O) ^" |3 Q
4. Pennsylvania State University
' g* a# _* P( V# l5. Ball State University* b* R3 M: e1 k- x* I5 o! j6 e
5 |- I) U! g# K7 r
Analysis and planning:/ h: q9 c9 \( X" u7 i: V
1. Kansas State University- |- Y( m! `8 d% A
2. Pennsylvania State University
! s$ c( b1 I7 f3 N& p' l3. Louisiana State University
7 e* E1 f! |. d' Q1 L2 dUniversity of Georgia
& L' C$ `0 k8 _$ E- _1 s6 X6 s5. Harvard University a+ n5 {: k0 Y4 y7 O( E+ p
5 m4 F+ @6 b1 n4 `% T7 z! {Construction methods and materials:' m+ }( w6 o) [: ]$ D
1. Kansas State University
J) q7 a* Z/ m; k+ Q2. University of Georgia
/ x, l X( i+ K. N+ m) _3. Louisiana State University
4 U8 C0 Z; ?1 |. wPennsylvania State University
# v3 f& K9 _& g" I# QPurdue University
# K4 n- ?3 n% z0 `# f4 @& E
/ x/ k$ i5 y: G3 z4 _, `2 |: VComputer applications:4 b8 C0 Y- k. d. {. m
1. Harvard University
4 l. h" v* [3 i2. Pennsylvania State University
p4 f4 q1 o f% w1 U3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
3 ? h* R, \7 wPurdue University
' a5 w! ?1 X6 v! z: QUniversity of Georgia7 j, ]+ P( ?, {! M% v+ @4 x2 X
- `4 a1 Y; u0 R
Research and theory:
O" z% ]( O1 E' e1. Harvard University
1 V4 @: \# [: Z2. Pennsylvania State University
$ h! s/ |1 y& m- L; H# t' N5 m3. Kansas State University( D. Y9 @# T0 ^: ^6 x! C. r
University of Georgia
# W7 G; U5 G) n5 j4 L# n1 X, _5. University of Oregon
& M1 X- V- f3 }$ A" F8 x) DUniversity of Virginia
1 k; B) }0 g5 B6 v ?- o# q
# \( B# N4 }( h& ^/ [Security design principles:
1 O5 f7 a0 B9 A' q2 c; r; ~1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo7 L/ I, }7 P# a
Kansas State University
# W# Z/ t* N" W3 ?University of Georgia/ ?& A" x# k- [3 \
4. Ball State University
5 Q& U( @% D. }+ ?8 M5. Pennsylvania State University
* U2 M: f6 f; | [' F, ?- u* Z+ d2 v, X" o; s% c
Sustainable design practices and principles:$ O9 I( h. _8 o4 t
1. University of Georgia
: T4 [+ L. q2 F# t6 J9 KUniversity of Oregon
0 ]5 g. l' c5 C6 M8 i) x5 S6 T6 c3. Pennsylvania State University
% g9 |! N7 E6 T7 j5 S4. Ball State University4 W- f+ t W+ z( \/ [) g* S1 N7 I1 e
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
; Q( A6 [0 \. F( B) A+ SHarvard University
" p- n9 d K QKansas State University
1 B, d) M# \; i7 {% QMichigan State University, Z0 V/ z% m' |
3 p& k# I2 w$ M( R, b* X
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
architecture rank graduate
-
architecture-programs-with-the-most-AIA-ACSA
-
archtecture-skill-assess
-
landscape-architecture-historical-survey.
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|
GO
发表于 2008-2-16 15:16:05
发表于 2008-2-16 16:58:50
发表于 2008-10-30 17:16:27
3
转发
