- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
  
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044
! V- {6 H: i- ]" a0 |& y9 w
. H$ q- Q2 d9 B& |4 G5 e. y1 X) K& g( V上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。: A; ?: L! V" u8 p4 q( `
9 F8 V# {' S; H+ WQualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 20074 K0 \3 c3 d( V& Z" \
. ^+ U+ E& r5 O# B' h t9 S% KHarvard University – Architecture
1 Z, M7 v6 U$ L3 w# R* J• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture3 ?& Z8 c6 w. R3 q
and Urban Design% R; h9 k3 C" k; _
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
3 ]. x0 J% x% X$ I• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth: w( w, [: ?7 `/ y1 O
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought7 ?) A) x: F1 _7 F! U
• Breadth of world view
2 l0 c: C- a+ s1 P8 k3 x8 Y• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice
; F3 \1 I6 ~, {, l7 r$ E• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students- V4 z; o8 C& E- D! O$ I
• Good balance of theory and practice, very international5 l" O. ~7 n7 g! e/ q) n M
/ N: Q, \, ], U' c& ]. | ]
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design
1 v0 Y6 @' L+ d# `! y$ {• Active connections to the profession
$ n$ Z2 r7 U' D/ g. e1 w& e• Strength of internship program2 U: D8 b7 i# @- f
• CIDA similar program1 S1 k' n) c; j$ {) N" N
• Strong technology base/ O# \+ [7 Y$ v9 J
• Strong overall undergraduate program
3 ~- @9 j0 Q7 i: |" V T• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior3 f2 l+ s( M) a2 B
Design and Architecture co-op
& w, D5 q, I. W, d/ O4 ?0 I• Excellent co-programs* O" w: O& }* a1 i0 |: o3 I
• Direct competition for internships and jobs$ E1 X) i$ L' v6 f% }$ k: H
• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students' `6 { Q1 _- w/ j6 u% j
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
' Y- i9 ]0 W# F! Q+ `9 u* t: l- O
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture. f9 W/ i8 Z$ R Q
• Attention to design and small town urbanism
9 u$ A& i. h# [7 R• Quality of faculty
/ u# V' {" V8 o6 I• Students can choose from three tracts of study
( b$ |* N! ?; d3 B• Good design research base in sustainable design
8 K* z" M; O- Z3 E4 ?; W7 r. M) n• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
5 e/ a H6 s( ~% w
, F# J! R" u+ y) J p- p7 }0 m% K6 p2 G( g" g }
Design Programs Most Admired
! y+ x( ] E5 p! {3 Y# J# M! Z4 m' ]by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
* u/ N6 ~, f7 V7 P1 ~2 c" Q5 }* V1 J* Y f1 o5 P$ c
Architecture2 \; {; l* a# i$ j/ ? W
1 Harvard University5 I: t8 h8 @! V$ ^& \" E
2 Auburn University
) G9 }. {) a" W) IMassachusetts Institute of Technology
$ x0 b2 N! g% y4 University of Michigan
" V0 i/ l& U* G- _, L( J5 Columbia University9 a1 D# \3 v9 A9 M- D
6 University of Pennsylvania
2 A7 l9 p- s! A( S; fUniversity of Virginia: x! v; F$ X# {
7 Cornell University
; _5 g% b+ J( U& cGeorgia Institute of Technology* e# k! ]; z; r7 Y1 k. _7 s
University of California, Berkeley
, T l8 T" _3 S" Z0 q7 FUniversity of Minnesota! S J S+ Z C0 W7 [) t
Yale University
4 w! h& h. j" o. K
5 C+ f: l0 ^; hLandscape Architecture4 x% j: R; |& d5 T% x9 \; x9 _
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
( P% j8 |" W, l4 kHarvard University5 ^3 i+ p3 k7 x2 e7 U& F. B
University of Virginia
2 w4 x+ m6 v' i, u- O4 Pennsylvania State University7 i+ g* b w5 i& X5 K
University of Georgia' Z2 O+ K6 J$ A/ }" m
University of Pennsylvania% C. P" K( H9 X5 C9 m( x
7 California Polytechnic State University,; O4 j8 E. n5 }8 L v) s
San Luis Obispo3 i* o. I) o. n" S- A6 u
Kansas State University: v, U" E; ?! k9 A4 K5 Z* }5 E
Michigan State University
- K. o% k6 n) [University of California, Davis) Y4 g# `9 X& X4 A6 B% S3 J/ K
4 J4 i, R7 X1 a! _+ L; c
Interior Design5 j7 i7 n1 G! g: m; S5 t8 H0 x. H$ [
1 University of Cincinnati
9 m" J3 b: U' G" r) _4 S0 S2 Rhode Island School of Design. v8 l" x L5 {6 ]* a9 Y
3 Arizona State University' ^6 n. x/ Z! R( j
Cornell University
) R' A$ G5 \' TKansas State University
( J3 c5 ~, h3 n/ H: h: Q6 Art Center College of Design
/ d* G# v4 f9 X; dArt Institute of Chicago8 ~* m' F& d7 V6 k; w* `8 _; W
Florida State University
& _- g7 C5 s( p* f SLawrence Technological University" g; Y6 \& o+ `( \$ B. x& ]: C
Pratt Institute
2 s! k. Z \1 r5 I( KUniversity of Oregon/ F A- |' a: A4 M, i3 T7 i
1 }7 L5 K. B+ y' f+ Z1 P3 wDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007* W* p2 z8 e3 F" M2 D
& m( J5 r3 f- B
UNDERGRADUATE3 R" O( O# ^6 {2 j& m: Q
1 Cornell University. ~! B# Z1 r$ F0 \( S: N0 n
2 Rice University. n$ i, D. c6 C( v% Y0 B1 P1 r+ [
3 Syracuse University& F! }& k" H( p" I q# B& T
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- K; _5 j! [* Q6 D3 U# g! _7 ~5 Rhode Island School of Design% N J9 v5 O. h& }- h8 d
6 Auburn University6 b* F3 z+ J4 n3 ~8 U
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo2 \( [( G G: y5 U
6 University of Kansas*
6 D2 r4 z* K, d7 o% d% f9 University of Texas at Austin
- ^2 Y7 m3 K( [& b1 J10 Carnegie Mellon University
! r5 L& w4 ~1 w* b4 T2 l11 University of Notre Dame
0 B/ ]/ q# J `+ E5 W12 Kansas State University6 N. w( C U8 d/ f, L' z3 o
13 Illinois Institute of Technology
- \$ u5 L3 \" \/ L( x1 R14 Iowa State University* l0 t' a; u1 }% j
14 Pratt Institute7 W+ ^' G& F5 ` l
14 University of Oregon
# J4 c4 v' ] o, r14 University of Southern California+ Q* O6 t, I; O& |5 R6 e/ o5 Z
" n$ z. i5 I+ v. ^
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007, k! j9 q3 | A4 d4 Z
, g/ ]1 c( [+ g) S+ E
GRADUATE
: M6 y% i3 b, \/ S' J' B( ?+ L1 Harvard University; A4 f- @) e) A
2 University of Cincinnati' j: v, l# J ^
3 Yale University
6 N9 ~( [. s) i6 }5 N; P) K' \: X4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
# K1 z" l: j! J+ J6 ~" C5 University of Virginia
+ R8 ]1 X: ^8 J+ m2 q6 @1 k6 Cornell University
! `% L- T* x9 E6 Rice University
& S0 D2 P' y6 K6 c' u: ^* Q6 Washington University in St. Louis
+ K3 j& o1 n; @0 j7 I- Q1 i9 Columbia University
! D. a8 j) A! H, @10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; X- m' T' g& ]) v5 Y! Q$ ?' v, C
11 Princeton University
+ p$ O, ]- }/ {! P1 t) V11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
3 [# ^) g% T) X- |: ~ @; ]( T11 University of Texas at Austin
) L2 b2 G1 @0 Y/ P% R; G14 Rhode Island School of Design: ^2 V: E: g6 e
15 University of Michigan
& j- A7 e O2 ?# b6 g! x
8 Y2 ]9 O( o: a* e1 t! EDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
5 V4 [' Y2 {" N) z4 |+ C, Z( {1 g6 Z, T m3 M1 }* Z. F
UNDERGRADUATE $ m/ M/ L( e1 p# ^& d; x, E
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
v* Q& y' |* y9 Y7 a2 r8 |" MCornell University 1 1 1 2 4
" ~$ M# M5 a* U# J' h% I# P. X7 kRice University 2 3 3 4 10 1 s! Z5 l# y! \. C3 [5 f
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
+ _0 O( g: [% \' V. G. a8 aVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14 & f5 w1 C: ^- G, `0 L
Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
, Y. n0 { F+ `/ V6 `Auburn University 6 15 - - 10
, Y: p0 g3 U' w- A7 @- CCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
! S( p, t: e5 e: L8 FUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -
/ {* r7 f( Y/ V6 N9 PUniversity of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
' b" Z9 `& D1 U9 f; j2 W8 c4 n* ECarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -4 @! v# `( ?. s; j2 \# a
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -9 I7 l4 h) ~9 ?- h' `3 q- n
Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
5 ~* H5 D# k) m% pIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -
, C+ T/ ~ d# Y8 d. t( j2 D1 ]+ C; wIowa State University 14 13 12 11 -3 v( X; S' E: G) W2 y$ _2 k
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -. O3 Q7 m% }6 z1 L
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -/ n) U; E, Z0 ?( E% V1 G
University of Southern California 14 - - - -
1 j# ^ | q# W/ M4 m4 sBall State University‡ - - - - 140 A% J) M, i& p/ m! t2 U) U& U6 E
Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -: E' s' M. _/ ~9 m, b% E. G& J
' @& G: I0 k* c! t: a
7 d4 w0 L: V) l1 W
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20070 ?. }/ `8 P3 h1 \8 I1 N
- a+ m: A, W, u. Y! K* \* X# I. D* q& m0 {UNDERGRADUATE7 p: b" V( [/ I/ `' @$ H
1 Louisiana State University- k& h9 t$ l+ n1 H2 s
1 Pennsylvania State University" d1 n$ U' @1 T% y0 e& [" Z
3 Kansas State University: z+ a$ s& u$ L2 s8 B; }
4 University of Georgia" G* ?4 ~% U& R: c
5 Ball State University- N" g* r! W8 s) P
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
7 a' [! ^8 `3 f& ~: A5 Cornell University) t) V Z) N5 D! Q; P( Y
5 Purdue University
) n" h' {! S4 ^" J9 Ohio State University
( ^: ]1 l/ P* V% x) J10 Texas A&M University/ P& k+ V' ]$ c2 c; @
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
/ V% h) T r0 b! b12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
8 c4 W& A" F' q9 d13 Michigan State University
# G7 X {' \3 t/ j- c6 o! ]13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
" M9 B" R n+ t' ^7 @15 Iowa State University" E0 ~. I$ R }+ ?' s
15 University of Oregon7 V! ~" n8 z8 d) Q1 c! b
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
. P1 B& r0 k5 z7 p( u; l5 `# B5 c8 J6 N7 a
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007& \4 ]' ^+ H3 Y5 T0 Y# z, \ y- I
+ S9 ?) M6 R0 l: ~$ f2 t# v
GRADUATE
+ x3 ?1 ?1 ]8 s* W1 Harvard University
3 u$ n- J2 w# b; C; Z2 Kansas State University
8 X; h# p* q5 b9 G _3 University of Georgia
2 }* X6 h" N3 C' [4 University of Pennsylvania
- w$ t7 }9 q+ f7 f! j; f+ ~" f5 Louisiana State University
8 e+ _1 |9 j8 y% J+ n, O6 Rhode Island School of Design
' s4 t1 V3 C) L& A- ^2 s9 |' z0 z6 University of Michigan
* Y3 _/ `$ K/ p) h* f6 University of Virginia* ?4 Y! J/ W: D0 b; \
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
% N$ p# x$ N* k! A9 I9 Ohio State University
6 C1 ? }0 X) B" ~2 F7 n9 o7 F- F11 Cornell University3 O$ D i7 L: M$ U' N- m
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign e9 G. g9 j* q8 J5 v: ?
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
* |8 z8 V6 U1 a( h. t6 D$ f13 Texas A&M University
6 f4 n* p3 A0 g/ X; @13 University of California, Berkeley
* g" H4 w; S& J W13 University of Oregon
; U5 w, `: _# ~+ u3 B
. Q/ Z3 o& u f$ f* BSkills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture9 C, V e |$ d" |' s
This ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
v6 ]" z3 W, \2 U
& R5 Z" L. i1 } ODesign:
# s4 u% |* q7 `9 }6 U1. Harvard University; T& z' T, F0 b9 R+ u
2. Kansas State University7 _6 P3 q1 K+ ]* T; Q! f
3. Louisiana State University8 [" |; q+ A5 _, C4 P% I- U1 P
4. Pennsylvania State University* L1 h: T4 s4 s. S7 r
5. Ball State University
& N6 q5 z% q: J% h% |5 p
- k7 Q1 V) R2 ?- q D- u. nAnalysis and planning:
2 U4 U4 ~1 ]8 D3 P: n8 O1. Kansas State University
. @2 f+ h0 @7 I- @2. Pennsylvania State University
- f0 X3 w$ v% ~/ Q4 E3. Louisiana State University% e# Q' n) ]$ |/ J( {8 Z
University of Georgia
. j5 R1 K6 @5 w$ U) N5. Harvard University
( ]+ Y1 L; {' {+ j& S$ u
- k; A2 A% P# ~! n7 s' mConstruction methods and materials:
* {* M* ]9 b1 \& ^ y1. Kansas State University4 m$ K; C1 H* ~: e9 J) q* N
2. University of Georgia
' t' N" ?8 G- o" _" }7 h0 U3. Louisiana State University$ F3 p; J5 c1 v, j# d
Pennsylvania State University
: K& E1 l$ P$ j7 y" E- Q( p1 nPurdue University
5 C9 O/ [/ j5 P/ A3 b0 q: t9 r6 x% c" x# B1 o# ^) \
Computer applications:
# r* O7 _7 G3 ~1 A5 W" @1. Harvard University7 `/ G$ I% W2 F0 w8 ~
2. Pennsylvania State University
: A: q3 ^% R3 Y* l& U* j3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
1 e+ p; m2 h5 s4 bPurdue University9 G4 Y, a# x% ]8 e+ {% \
University of Georgia
2 u9 a5 {4 Z$ W! ]2 u/ s; i8 T% E5 z) X* B8 x# H
Research and theory:# @( N7 z; h% G9 x3 k4 r3 M
1. Harvard University
/ p' R) [) T, R3 X) i2. Pennsylvania State University: f4 f3 t+ V" g# U
3. Kansas State University
& V) f+ w. x; o3 V0 a5 AUniversity of Georgia! t* Q3 }1 f% _8 u# A9 k( V4 D) l
5. University of Oregon
5 f' m! X2 [9 Y, lUniversity of Virginia5 ^! R2 Z" }: s, o, `" U1 z
8 o1 K K" _6 j3 b6 N1 wSecurity design principles:, `. Z( o" {$ c3 N" t/ A
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo: W- ?7 }) Y# `) x' ^
Kansas State University
' Z* Q G2 Z" m) x) e+ f2 O; LUniversity of Georgia; u! e0 m+ R( i( e, l- J& c
4. Ball State University
/ i1 y H |# @1 T5. Pennsylvania State University
- f, x! {: m1 j1 A# T6 D4 |: {. y% S
3 F) ?+ c/ m5 q3 ZSustainable design practices and principles:
# H7 \5 ]' K+ h% t: L1. University of Georgia1 ]& E3 {: V* v+ O0 {% d
University of Oregon
0 B2 a( g; ]. p& F1 H3. Pennsylvania State University7 }1 ~1 K, }) C/ G2 k
4. Ball State University
7 |; p/ g/ F. H3 P, }# p: vCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
5 W6 @* {+ h/ a8 v5 k; E: dHarvard University7 a6 d" D2 T- `: O4 H9 }
Kansas State University* F$ j4 z5 m7 k
Michigan State University3 l7 L5 W8 v9 j; r4 @
. V% \! s, c+ t. L* G6 m, |( v[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|
GO
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
发表于 2008-2-16 15:16:05
发表于 2008-2-16 16:58:50
发表于 2008-10-30 17:16:27
3
转发
