- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
  
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044
: Y- M* b& q+ T3 w
+ q$ |! i6 {7 u/ ^$ Y3 B, Y* X7 N上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
C& j0 O- ]( t8 f- b# \2 t( k% Q8 d. Y; ?4 {. v2 R5 P$ [
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
% L( Z3 k7 Z- v. g. x% k1 V8 s) R0 l5 c t/ K
Harvard University – Architecture
' s/ n" ^2 ^7 t9 C. p• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
9 P& q( A* V) s% O+ band Urban Design
& s* @4 {2 e$ W& Q9 [8 r! y• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline' p2 O, J0 b0 @, E
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth* i+ j( H$ q4 K9 W# @
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought
! m( J: ` c' K• Breadth of world view
2 g- o) W7 d3 O4 s9 j% F; i* u/ U• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice* o, V, m" R' b8 W) z) \* N
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
2 o L% y# n% g% u A; h, y• Good balance of theory and practice, very international' i1 T! M( q( A B9 G$ R
- Q& e/ H4 T8 [
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design) Y$ d% ^: n: |3 P& y
• Active connections to the profession
$ \, w9 O. T" Z• Strength of internship program2 S! L) |6 O4 Y
• CIDA similar program
: j7 M J' h; K1 z6 M• Strong technology base& c1 C5 [2 [6 ]
• Strong overall undergraduate program
% G( L `$ y/ s6 M/ Y7 \- Z+ M• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior
* n- l- `- }" c" R2 _+ [, e. |Design and Architecture co-op. Z% x1 F k' k# U3 W4 l5 p; s
• Excellent co-programs6 F* } D- X; }3 z- q, d
• Direct competition for internships and jobs: R$ x- c7 Z% ^# F. V& l, P
• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students, l( p3 a* m/ i4 k/ ?, ~/ A
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
& W9 ~' }5 \% a! P6 W) t
4 E/ x$ j. R; C! yUniversity of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
) E0 i' e2 c- g1 s0 Q0 p# R• Attention to design and small town urbanism7 A) |. J4 d& [2 r/ {5 Z
• Quality of faculty
+ c* i' w: T/ ]3 ?: g• Students can choose from three tracts of study
7 a- e1 F0 H; U) H• Good design research base in sustainable design% h1 C4 p9 G4 t+ F L5 ]. d4 \0 @
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
5 H9 G* b& ^* s" V; u4 q2 n# }
* l: u, o1 y" v% j' K8 x6 ]( V
! M# I- e4 Z7 ODesign Programs Most Admired
. u: Q/ i9 N5 N$ r2 F3 u: E& aby Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
7 M) S( ^* r2 z9 u4 e6 a- x+ I3 u* u u# k3 B/ Z* |
Architecture/ O: v9 @# ]( I
1 Harvard University+ q" Y8 G0 w# {0 M1 ?, n
2 Auburn University* v) C, q R3 \
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
9 p: S3 w# W+ T' i7 o: `: k8 Q g4 University of Michigan! t9 V; W6 m' [
5 Columbia University& C0 T1 V& {" t' m! m
6 University of Pennsylvania
7 z b, E, J6 }. J. F1 JUniversity of Virginia* I( @* X+ l+ J7 H
7 Cornell University
6 V# `/ A0 V f# j2 r) F8 i/ L( bGeorgia Institute of Technology
( \* E4 F( x: q7 X% l5 N. aUniversity of California, Berkeley! l: ]! K0 ]7 T9 t8 v7 O
University of Minnesota4 s* K( [0 P8 |. {/ D. K2 C: W
Yale University
( ~) U6 M3 @! }7 B* n8 T- u
! r% q* ?! r/ ILandscape Architecture
+ Q0 a- a& g' |1 e% `( o9 \1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
8 I+ a: `7 f$ t/ s% `7 rHarvard University* S, K% f+ b) Z+ ~
University of Virginia
# w' b0 K: j# Y! Z4 Pennsylvania State University* e: X2 k2 a1 f$ y4 [6 G
University of Georgia
' o6 V* e6 \* EUniversity of Pennsylvania6 G6 M( I2 u+ B1 }0 A
7 California Polytechnic State University,
( @ b- P0 w, k8 {4 c# U& A8 p6 i( Y$ lSan Luis Obispo
7 D( Z8 ?/ ]9 U! f1 M( t) X* mKansas State University7 D$ Z' M- b9 U, G- V/ A$ X
Michigan State University
# A' V/ b P0 H2 o2 j' y$ P) k: LUniversity of California, Davis* f' ^: _8 e* d
/ O3 O2 n) n) e' q+ BInterior Design
! L: G; T; Q, U/ Z9 g& I1 University of Cincinnati" ]- L6 i# u. p5 O
2 Rhode Island School of Design3 G8 L) |. P/ d3 W; X
3 Arizona State University
) h5 F9 O4 K) o& |) H9 mCornell University2 ^/ d- D4 d9 E, D) A
Kansas State University
3 I+ k# t2 v" p" \9 j6 Art Center College of Design1 A8 e1 U P" S* r! X) q# w1 v
Art Institute of Chicago0 \) y: u7 \, Y* d$ b6 n
Florida State University
7 C; I4 Y% N s/ y9 x# V1 `Lawrence Technological University1 Y4 @& q4 [9 V+ n9 `
Pratt Institute
8 W) Q) e; \. n2 z, g% ~, v$ ~University of Oregon* p5 X" {) Z/ }- X. V/ I& T
5 n/ P* y. [ J4 e8 s. S3 o
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007' A4 Z% }+ P9 g/ ]( w- \
( P7 p% J, d7 h" A) }6 T- hUNDERGRADUATE
* q9 U+ ~5 u- q% q# T5 J+ y; u7 Q5 i1 Cornell University# T9 Q' l9 r/ ?1 u
2 Rice University8 O% I% C" B4 R/ C. _
3 Syracuse University7 l8 P6 ]! H7 c) I
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
, ]1 p0 U! S* b9 H5 Rhode Island School of Design6 T9 X6 V% Y' K6 a" [' \7 O( ~. R
6 Auburn University
, e; H9 _% V# q' _6 M+ ?6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- H/ z1 U% n- C5 o! s6 University of Kansas*
X. g: P: \" u& p9 University of Texas at Austin I+ t( m. _: H* A' o
10 Carnegie Mellon University1 c% g5 n: K, w
11 University of Notre Dame T' ^, d) @. i! U/ p N
12 Kansas State University
. c [( g K$ D9 |# y13 Illinois Institute of Technology( E2 B t& b+ ]. Y0 R' ?
14 Iowa State University& u2 I2 e$ \1 x3 L, x
14 Pratt Institute
8 r$ J+ n% c2 N9 ]1 x, `" |8 p$ }( _14 University of Oregon: I' \' t! L/ m. K- h
14 University of Southern California$ e( }& `- f% K% ]. E
]$ @0 H% G* @4 c# g
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
: P& ~; P0 L! p7 w0 C: s
9 c; x [" P/ j0 @: f; p$ O. cGRADUATE
/ e1 y+ Q! w- s" X x5 U, H+ I, p; ?% K1 Harvard University
, F5 u7 s2 M& b9 g& J# N2 University of Cincinnati& m5 `, r2 _/ `. M8 B( u) ^ l# Z
3 Yale University$ _0 V' D3 R, [/ ]
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
' I& o" `( q( b! A2 B# P- `: ^+ `) m. p5 University of Virginia
8 S9 q# ~8 B' k' ]8 g6 Cornell University
G: g# \# W+ Q4 X$ @. ^4 d, [3 B' Q6 Rice University
; v$ U. s) c; K: _8 ~+ B6 Washington University in St. Louis
3 n- i2 X. i/ L% u2 j. T! {9 Columbia University1 x% f. V& i8 E; _+ s) I. C
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University% C0 [( l/ ~; P
11 Princeton University) o. a6 M- i+ c% q
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
7 R6 W9 s' [$ X7 q0 E- j11 University of Texas at Austin
8 R6 i3 O0 _3 Y# I& z14 Rhode Island School of Design
- K% c$ X0 e# e. s) H: K15 University of Michigan) D4 D' ~0 F6 ^' B! n
. s' x9 W1 a* K
DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
! q+ G3 h, L: h% A. x( t% L* V- Q; F' N7 r- j7 O
UNDERGRADUATE
4 ?6 x( r" H6 `. m nSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
9 z3 M! \* Z$ V/ F1 Z6 h/ PCornell University 1 1 1 2 4
9 a! G" [" {% URice University 2 3 3 4 10
' i" H* U! N& ]Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
+ x ^+ N" [' q: p1 u n C( wVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
! j( w* P! x" t9 {+ S _# }+ MRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
6 z0 L! n, P2 i* I6 M7 UAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 ) h8 L# I7 y0 w- ~! ^
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2: s+ b; R4 G/ g5 x9 F3 a
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -# k- F, M' q4 A8 c# {" G% @
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 69 i/ M6 `# i: O+ H4 ]. g
Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
, ]& |# b4 j' Y" _University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
0 h4 R+ y% ~; sKansas State University 12 5 6 8 60 B1 {: x, D; p
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -2 O1 j/ k6 r" n2 @9 J
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -' `% q# b, Y4 g8 e& G9 x
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -, Y7 q" R( R% R6 t% p
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -4 I$ s5 K& n( H0 K! ]' ?4 `
University of Southern California 14 - - - -- Y0 s6 c( A. U
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
/ L2 T5 I# s1 ^7 h, ^5 J# r# u3 wPennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
6 X0 q9 H" i3 |5 P2 d" g- Q9 C
& V4 Q0 S, x4 k+ A2 z( I; A; P8 i4 e/ F
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20079 _& V" o- s$ ]* m
' T) K5 C6 ]4 x* iUNDERGRADUATE$ Q. I9 V1 n" i }8 c/ K
1 Louisiana State University
$ W& P F/ E* T4 a( a( J# @1 A1 Pennsylvania State University
0 D' i0 l" H3 P, w1 d, @" F3 Z2 J3 Kansas State University( s8 x* O1 p1 a
4 University of Georgia
) k3 j8 f* {4 y5 Ball State University1 B! |- M m* [9 R% Y; L
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo! q& A1 ?7 k6 T3 B7 D
5 Cornell University
/ d- H3 T( \8 s( ~/ w5 Purdue University
8 ? K. h O( _0 X5 I6 _! s9 Ohio State University
' t' N, c) U. k* J, |- V' J10 Texas A&M University2 {( {% L1 a4 j
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
, f, T* j* y" }* m3 P I12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
$ P6 [/ J5 p- j7 l13 Michigan State University
& {- D; z. |% h z" C a13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
; S2 g; Z8 h& _15 Iowa State University
% S( t F$ Z3 \15 University of Oregon9 J+ E1 x- B( D; F
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison$ }: U! B, i5 k- o. e
: Y$ S8 e% h% A: E- n: ?1 I
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 20077 [ G$ q; K- o y7 F1 Y
# z) i( |. w, }7 V. a( C1 T( r
GRADUATE
% Q- D1 L/ E0 s: a1 Harvard University* r f& y( E7 t j" o* Z
2 Kansas State University8 n: R6 Y4 g, N3 \' _; J9 W( m& c
3 University of Georgia
8 C6 b" B6 n* Z, d$ \0 y4 Y4 University of Pennsylvania
2 s1 i& \' c% [3 w6 o* ^. P {5 Louisiana State University
3 J R- l& g# ]: X3 g6 Rhode Island School of Design5 {9 m2 @9 \: h$ T: }
6 University of Michigan
, n$ ^2 m5 d+ j) v+ e) _6 University of Virginia
( e4 g1 `# W" f9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
/ N* g% a' S( \, G( a6 c6 \, k. F9 Ohio State University9 [) A. E. a; _
11 Cornell University! H( k2 a! I+ J' _
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
" a8 R. J* M: S) q( ]: `% r" W+ |13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona" p8 R9 a- z: f* `, Z3 \
13 Texas A&M University
D9 ^( j, E% w13 University of California, Berkeley) A* ?5 A& ?: t: w
13 University of Oregon
: @5 Z' X$ o! e t8 q! v! W z' A% D
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
& W0 t- ]9 \9 B) O2 J/ K! p% j6 fThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.3 U# g6 A/ Y; \0 B( N
1 e6 N# b5 w! F, C6 nDesign:
0 ^$ ?3 N% S' k: |1. Harvard University
' r9 I! F; _* a+ B, j/ o2 n% t2. Kansas State University5 I0 _) m- j% g1 r( r
3. Louisiana State University' Q; P8 n/ Q8 C, L) S
4. Pennsylvania State University
% W" P; P4 i; \. l5. Ball State University; |$ A1 q7 u& ]9 w; \9 w' R5 x8 p; j
. I) c! s" o* b# O y8 B
Analysis and planning:
: L0 y0 @/ r' e8 w1. Kansas State University
* H6 S+ z6 v% ?" A8 h2 K* P' K2. Pennsylvania State University
* ?: s3 m: x+ K9 Y3. Louisiana State University5 r5 G( v% l7 A6 ]& {$ v
University of Georgia
$ |4 a: k) [3 w& `3 Q3 F' g5. Harvard University
/ q) N) g1 v: H8 F
8 p5 r8 n/ y: Q6 `: ^4 GConstruction methods and materials:6 ~* _. F8 N+ C" C3 O4 q7 A& S) D
1. Kansas State University/ G b2 q6 S/ R" D d! t
2. University of Georgia5 f) J% a3 V3 I2 e: K/ s* f) ~6 q
3. Louisiana State University* S- L* X2 x6 U' f
Pennsylvania State University' ], U6 l& z+ o+ O- X* s
Purdue University- R# b7 l+ H w# R! s' `9 N5 E
0 O- h1 m9 T+ _; }8 \2 b/ nComputer applications:
+ R: s% G4 K! R W1. Harvard University
: d/ S, [" u8 _* N2. Pennsylvania State University) E# j8 q& q" n$ C; w
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
0 S8 f' ]- a& B6 v! n$ a5 G' {Purdue University! X) _& s- S6 H$ p$ y
University of Georgia
# L6 s! ?( J$ @! D
& O, o4 l: u# b% `0 q2 y8 |3 XResearch and theory: q- L; Y: d* B
1. Harvard University* }. \" q+ ~8 M- P8 Z
2. Pennsylvania State University
& a4 X) r- T0 c h# b$ C" d3. Kansas State University
$ a- ~. F6 I: C7 h6 a1 ~( `University of Georgia3 z5 O3 y- d! w
5. University of Oregon! c: m( U6 q7 v0 v" t" Q6 ~
University of Virginia8 ?& Y" p3 @& t: x' w5 A5 v$ ^; Y
, o. O0 T6 `6 j1 P/ V
Security design principles:
; ?8 Y8 H- g6 _# @+ A; C1 h1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo7 W4 ~/ j# ^0 H6 v# b' Q
Kansas State University" y, B q1 C# U* A
University of Georgia u/ W% \. F/ k9 W6 T$ U
4. Ball State University1 {. h7 I2 k9 s' X& Q: S, v
5. Pennsylvania State University2 E) B& H6 D+ z' v( O- N
$ J/ d4 ^; }5 \2 y* k$ F
Sustainable design practices and principles:
. v# n- { ^8 N# C2 C1. University of Georgia
- G" i; q# R) t5 a1 J/ ?University of Oregon/ C* K+ p& |4 Q& n- d2 X! D6 ~% j
3. Pennsylvania State University( l6 ~' k$ [9 ]3 g) w) q% j- L* f; ]
4. Ball State University
! V, ]# e1 ~6 ]7 z. A$ U0 zCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo' v: A( n3 [# l' j& l* @+ n
Harvard University
* Z0 ]' h; S* u) e2 Z# h! S* m1 g+ J; A3 t \Kansas State University( [- _8 d% `, h! s* i. C0 r" g A" T
Michigan State University
) u6 P1 H7 }7 o# [0 ^. ]2 i' ^4 x7 t/ v3 e$ _# M S1 r
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|
GO
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
发表于 2008-2-16 15:16:05
发表于 2008-2-16 16:58:50
发表于 2008-10-30 17:16:27
3
转发
