- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044! s5 J1 P' Q, p1 M0 U" c
, o @/ \4 K% m/ X1 T1 r上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
: v$ Z" V' p+ c7 x0 ~" K6 `# k! X2 q+ s1 m6 G8 H6 |8 [
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 20072 |( ]' B. Q& m+ ]" h- f
- a" |% p0 ]6 fHarvard University – Architecture1 Q9 C' R3 V+ y8 [
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture/ {+ M' a# u) A( E$ G1 V: i8 a
and Urban Design4 z! H& N, y. R! _5 P
• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline" f* {* i. [! V( ^( x7 G1 J
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth
: ^- q% D, x8 U! J% d9 I, L2 ~• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought' k/ a# F& U q9 ]" Z
• Breadth of world view4 \6 }) c+ h: v9 z8 {8 Y v+ Y3 D
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice5 u8 ]: N7 f, z5 f% r
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students* O% d- p9 `! G. U) S! ]+ M
• Good balance of theory and practice, very international
7 D" U7 b. E t9 v: G/ A+ t7 [; r3 w. X4 \" d, C; i* a
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design
a- N+ y+ V2 M: {8 s8 b• Active connections to the profession
. R$ V, ]# T" [* O F9 \• Strength of internship program" y$ Y$ r7 X H+ f4 a$ K5 b0 |5 U8 M
• CIDA similar program4 s) @. y! _1 G* x: z; Q# ]& d
• Strong technology base
* N3 t7 U* ]! {' E2 y8 ?8 Z• Strong overall undergraduate program
3 ~7 {! p: U! t# X, i! z• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior$ q9 [, {' y/ |- |7 Q- s+ c% ?/ w
Design and Architecture co-op3 ^0 P4 |7 V5 `( B, v
• Excellent co-programs/ D9 w1 Z$ f* y5 p0 e1 m) K
• Direct competition for internships and jobs
5 O0 @3 T o5 ]6 W8 y* n/ h! F' S( U1 G• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students
0 g7 L1 {5 f4 d( c) C) S• Graduates appear to have good practical sense: W( x1 Y: m* C: N( b9 ?' D& y& [
4 G W8 |% c( h, G q
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
( Z$ G) {" j) u• Attention to design and small town urbanism( d0 v+ n6 X" }2 n' O3 u( q
• Quality of faculty; r4 G/ A( m; ^8 |& J8 c! L/ K
• Students can choose from three tracts of study( R# b5 o; s+ X8 z
• Good design research base in sustainable design2 Y7 d8 O3 r+ f$ j1 E2 L1 M& q
• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
& y! a2 c2 J3 z
( b3 O! I/ H. l ?9 X$ [+ R# m
5 w9 H5 g+ I, |0 P- L# Q& n" t5 vDesign Programs Most Admired
; K5 a- C2 h) L, m! t6 _2 sby Deans and Department Chairs – 2007 / L! H+ M( K1 A/ \
3 N ~# Q, z1 S" \
Architecture0 @; B9 P l$ r$ E H
1 Harvard University
2 a# a3 B: I* w2 Auburn University1 \0 I9 o# @0 h9 I$ M- ?
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
6 U! {3 J7 V8 Z4 University of Michigan
5 ~; _. G8 {1 c0 P' V5 v t( j9 m1 g* s5 Columbia University1 j* ?. I- h$ c# A. l
6 University of Pennsylvania
8 D7 U# ]1 l- Z, GUniversity of Virginia. n8 x3 D. w; Y3 F# G/ F- g
7 Cornell University
( R8 L6 Q: U7 D6 V8 F8 R' gGeorgia Institute of Technology+ v" ]) m3 o% P2 V3 U4 S$ k
University of California, Berkeley
0 C' `" P* S7 W- f+ T. M2 k; Y& HUniversity of Minnesota. D) `7 t3 B7 h: h' a4 U
Yale University( O; |+ u3 I2 U) k t# s1 N7 q
7 A2 j3 Y: i, i3 A* N
Landscape Architecture
' m8 g& Q* Z+ Z- s! v1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada( ^5 Q$ X" @5 u9 V
Harvard University
/ T& v3 ]; n' v# n9 x: pUniversity of Virginia
5 @) m+ X* L: L- Y4 Pennsylvania State University# \/ v# O) Y4 R K
University of Georgia
' I# E! |# Y0 s. K, BUniversity of Pennsylvania/ y, F* a2 U) T7 ?' D
7 California Polytechnic State University,
3 E* @1 d* ]& d4 pSan Luis Obispo
1 Y7 F: w1 H0 s% O, N A9 l, W- w& xKansas State University
4 a! f. _0 y* h) Q' W2 {: uMichigan State University
$ h, p* ?5 F4 J# {( X4 Q8 e1 @8 Z) V+ M; [University of California, Davis* J# @( b, }. i; V; q- _, d9 A* r
, R1 V5 ]2 d* W! R
Interior Design+ y5 ?7 `! T6 R u' r; T! F
1 University of Cincinnati# o! F- s) Y0 h3 S {: l
2 Rhode Island School of Design
& H; @$ n) Z" ^: m. ~" k3 Arizona State University
- K/ h* t0 d' H/ i1 wCornell University
' f% \3 {% [3 |& dKansas State University9 C* c# {* s; O+ T+ ]9 z5 X
6 Art Center College of Design
: D! B6 \. Y8 U! F( i' dArt Institute of Chicago
# O' k8 k2 ]5 S# k- eFlorida State University
- T) b8 x6 q- p, zLawrence Technological University
+ m" A: t" _2 g# z& A0 |/ X8 ZPratt Institute' k7 `. R% k( U$ [
University of Oregon
0 y& x+ B! W& P* u; [" d6 z% N0 M! s$ D" P) N3 R5 W1 h7 q
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
% l1 K: b6 s8 s! }' s$ N* y- ~* U/ \5 i: u* q# J
UNDERGRADUATE, \5 r0 G. X5 r- X$ O* A9 i
1 Cornell University$ J/ c. b2 q. y" c8 [: A$ f
2 Rice University* `( r0 P5 X! p$ l2 r
3 Syracuse University! j& O; i# T& I/ F# u! s# a4 m
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
2 T. x( g( a6 B3 d- s% ^5 Rhode Island School of Design
8 B4 U. L7 ^* @8 S1 H h" ]6 Auburn University6 R6 [1 c1 F* p. N
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- e3 }) c! ^4 F) H6 k" J' W# r6 University of Kansas*$ v% O7 c8 M! f1 u1 c }( j
9 University of Texas at Austin1 {% s# D8 @* R. Q0 T6 e/ P& ?9 D
10 Carnegie Mellon University
4 R# K$ v& j3 Y, I) v. p11 University of Notre Dame8 H; b6 w7 n6 L1 F4 z ^
12 Kansas State University" D+ e3 \$ X& Z: ?. c9 z
13 Illinois Institute of Technology
) v: `( l! }- q$ u7 k, M14 Iowa State University; b) ~: b! F: h1 I0 a0 Z
14 Pratt Institute' I" ^, M& D, ]0 p0 I2 |7 n
14 University of Oregon" _: {( |# w' D1 M" Y, A9 K8 n
14 University of Southern California7 |& J! Q. p9 Y7 t
, v, L' R9 n1 r+ |0 ~* H. H% _
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007; f! v) B# }# }9 V
3 X5 Q; y. B) m# R8 @
GRADUATE$ P) r5 h4 J% L5 o6 @
1 Harvard University0 I U& G- t) L6 D# f
2 University of Cincinnati
* H. `* } `7 L4 N) }& K$ M3 Yale University
* e2 |/ m3 T) L5 W- d; M4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology8 U1 J. c( ]3 a, M! r
5 University of Virginia1 m4 o& `7 |0 M
6 Cornell University
+ K* `2 U% }# b# C! D6 Rice University9 `9 Q* N6 {0 U+ S3 s* u
6 Washington University in St. Louis
1 B" A( Y5 G6 p9 d: J9 Columbia University, A& h% Z4 V e# { g0 ^
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; l- U% |) J, A6 u; g
11 Princeton University+ \2 {8 w0 ]4 }, f
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign* K) q, b4 I; K) I
11 University of Texas at Austin) e1 q, {1 o3 }0 A
14 Rhode Island School of Design
! j( u& U3 }0 b6 W6 L& e3 K! P15 University of Michigan
; S: E. w/ @2 g/ v. A& Y+ o+ y! _2 {6 O; g& ?
DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
8 n" w. E/ O3 c: I9 l8 f; F; N9 P' p$ f7 C" I( T
UNDERGRADUATE
9 E2 W) x9 n! D$ uSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
0 p' `- U. @. O( x0 ~2 E' eCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 % |2 p0 ]) E1 N2 T1 k5 u
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10
3 A3 y5 X1 Y3 S: P0 F& TSyracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
0 k/ m( ~& \ iVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
& x P+ D/ v9 J8 M. e; eRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 - 6 ]- \+ m) b' r* f
Auburn University 6 15 - - 10
' N) w/ j. D1 n9 {/ m& aCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 27 K" X5 ~$ L! l) R2 }
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -( o M6 k2 f- q/ d H+ \. j# T7 ?+ g
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
5 l/ i$ P- \& E" C7 |8 ZCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -" \0 X. [# _$ k6 m, B
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -+ j) |9 y, ^+ n3 I; Z
Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
7 y9 v; w4 c2 |% l5 xIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -
$ X- z$ e% `3 g% b5 x1 \# h& eIowa State University 14 13 12 11 -
: m& x: {. g! d" {3 P1 bPratt Institute 14 10 - - -
0 u0 y V2 L$ A; cUniversity of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -" @( p- Z' M/ I
University of Southern California 14 - - - -7 B& s# Y2 ?+ a% h
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
4 T; ]) J3 V' n0 k4 _$ ~Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
: }3 W6 ]9 l" [/ m# w7 [7 i# }4 e/ H# I4 ?! m) E
1 L* Z/ g* N9 d* m& j3 B- E& {
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007 V5 h3 g8 [2 j& |7 U
% F& v% h- n$ g* S& DUNDERGRADUATE
; {- } W* g# N$ O1 Louisiana State University
! d$ o3 V3 h. @+ V ^. L: S5 Q1 Pennsylvania State University% \/ [- t/ ], u5 k! c3 T
3 Kansas State University/ d: t8 {* k4 r/ V
4 University of Georgia) t* T/ @, o/ d1 h: `
5 Ball State University
8 h; B% L7 r1 y! N7 \5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
: o; I4 q. i& F( S5 Cornell University
$ E+ [ P! |% j) A$ X- e! Q' i5 Purdue University" f4 q3 e: D+ u0 T0 _1 k5 \& o4 r
9 Ohio State University. C6 s" F8 ?7 D1 o
10 Texas A&M University
f1 |' a" O1 H, R11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
4 K/ E+ ^! V3 Y12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
# G5 [( u7 V) h$ Y' ^3 Y13 Michigan State University: J/ W" X7 S' _+ Z
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
9 {7 Y- R# U8 ]6 }) L15 Iowa State University% N& D+ w; U, J2 r- ]$ K& H0 i
15 University of Oregon
1 [# H$ X4 @& Y3 R3 \; C, a15 University of Wisconsin-Madison$ m# A# h; n" F1 X2 f" }4 \
?/ v0 @: v. L' zTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
6 o1 H8 B! @5 f+ l0 q, _/ K$ e; d* X% N9 Z
GRADUATE
+ J p8 c: b% e9 j. J1 Harvard University- a) X8 b) p/ l' [# I
2 Kansas State University. S5 @. D+ M$ N3 ^; _4 S
3 University of Georgia
8 x3 ~% i" d, G; h; e" D9 U4 University of Pennsylvania0 I8 l/ s# {1 w- c
5 Louisiana State University
2 u4 G% C; l j. \' g K! S6 Rhode Island School of Design
/ ~' V% h: a6 K9 {6 University of Michigan& b& n$ o: @7 A; O9 @
6 University of Virginia) K! y3 M( b3 r
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY: f, Q0 y) C) R: t, C3 E
9 Ohio State University
2 d* D* `: O- a. U& z$ a) |11 Cornell University2 z, b. |' Z3 } ^
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign3 G& d2 O4 Z# A$ i
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
% B0 |0 k6 h$ l) M+ H+ R& \5 Q# z# a13 Texas A&M University4 W9 ]9 a, w7 ]: X9 f
13 University of California, Berkeley
) h( n1 t [) k13 University of Oregon
/ R1 ]" Y e; K2 H8 E7 K
4 A- v9 h) J6 ZSkills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
8 t3 m6 g" v h9 Q, lThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.0 C% O$ _" i8 B) j9 W
3 x0 p, E8 R# j" YDesign:, I5 |2 j+ ~8 W! ]
1. Harvard University0 d A; D8 R, t7 I) r g5 y) T
2. Kansas State University
- u7 v* A" X. f& v3. Louisiana State University. `/ W3 | E x7 y
4. Pennsylvania State University4 m1 N7 y+ K. _0 X4 P, P4 s& Z' X; I
5. Ball State University. a+ B( H5 q9 S+ x
r, K# j3 G+ S6 u
Analysis and planning:
5 Y6 Y4 |/ O0 a* d' n! x1 J1. Kansas State University
1 v# d* D, }( ]& ^2. Pennsylvania State University6 M) _! E6 g7 a# |, u
3. Louisiana State University, j3 Z9 {+ b* W
University of Georgia
- l. D9 M- G$ K8 |) P5. Harvard University
, K1 K3 T) _* S8 m* H: W9 L# x9 r( I7 c; q( }
Construction methods and materials:% A" g- T' W6 y
1. Kansas State University
9 O$ ?0 q% t) _, H2. University of Georgia1 E; H& w, r' X4 i/ P/ b
3. Louisiana State University% p$ v# _6 u: x5 E
Pennsylvania State University: ^6 J" Z" F# ~" M" f
Purdue University
" b- V! v e2 z4 \) I: H! a8 h& ^
& k: {! ~. l- K: ~+ j$ hComputer applications:! [6 e: z: p) [
1. Harvard University' B7 {, C4 b$ h% ?8 X+ {2 d
2. Pennsylvania State University+ a" F( S7 E4 y+ T3 G
3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
! I: G/ d( \+ Q& [# S2 [Purdue University2 `4 T( Z; [3 ], C
University of Georgia7 L& G( b4 ?! o; R* J
# p, q: o3 `& ]- S( [# `* C8 `" l5 G
Research and theory:$ h5 N. e6 H9 D' j6 i
1. Harvard University) G5 C9 x1 n3 d1 |8 A; K o4 o/ g
2. Pennsylvania State University! s7 v2 `7 K5 g: _' P& V2 m
3. Kansas State University. u4 m4 k$ |% s7 _
University of Georgia
/ f k% a: C# \# A5. University of Oregon& U! o6 m1 f) C! q4 `5 t
University of Virginia+ Q; ?% J2 N4 ?
3 `% ?9 _% G* X5 i1 W: s' tSecurity design principles:& H; D$ m& `7 P! ~8 N T1 a' y& l
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
7 L* s2 i# `( b2 k/ \4 xKansas State University2 x5 z, ~ f) j4 I
University of Georgia2 X( [4 H( f& L! M2 \
4. Ball State University9 B( ? p3 G5 W5 {7 r3 |
5. Pennsylvania State University2 B! R4 Q+ D- K$ @$ e
: X9 ~& J1 m, _" Y" kSustainable design practices and principles:: A5 r I! f; v) g, c1 x
1. University of Georgia
7 k" w; ]% F8 T( L8 O6 vUniversity of Oregon
- Q, h: @/ t2 e: o3. Pennsylvania State University
2 s9 w, F0 n3 U3 e* U1 H4. Ball State University
4 V; }0 o: M' W) ] E ~2 w4 |California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
/ G/ F; b _$ D6 n/ aHarvard University' E) ~$ D$ N; y0 D! }1 R6 Q
Kansas State University' w! n. M2 d% G
Michigan State University
. Z% ~8 A6 L3 q" C ~( h* W6 t" S- s4 g# p
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|