- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
   
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
发表于 2008-2-16 14:46:57
|显示全部楼层
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044- a7 q, l4 Y# ^2 h3 M
8 L* ]8 {$ D6 `$ d+ ^% n上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。/ W9 _& ]. V9 j& X8 X& e6 Z0 s
$ V: x4 J9 O- x: w( L& k( |1 b
Qualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007& k% Y5 b- Z& Z% U* x
" J' I9 r. x, j/ q* i5 JHarvard University – Architecture
7 t" z! ?" u! O& h G- _• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture5 [* ~" y. w9 B C% `
and Urban Design
& w5 V' S+ Z% [7 h8 o6 W3 ?# i. a• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline. g/ V$ Z* r# `) g' g: M
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth6 G) m1 @0 S8 C/ x6 k N
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought' t, j+ q/ t. ?( |6 [9 \
• Breadth of world view- Z9 W$ ~+ a* X$ E; }" i
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice, d" @; {+ ?7 m
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
3 L b/ p1 b0 ^, E8 [• Good balance of theory and practice, very international
5 [& ^' G2 c! p" M7 Z5 d. G9 ^$ o; n0 O2 r3 X
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design
- [6 n# |: b8 `• Active connections to the profession
& J' v+ o" {* d4 t6 C• Strength of internship program3 b! M- L- O. Y7 T8 P; k4 q0 u
• CIDA similar program
9 T5 Z1 x2 J( }5 F- m• Strong technology base7 y6 H# x: t p' f2 h
• Strong overall undergraduate program( `3 S5 I- s2 R' P: B
• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior
$ B0 k# p; L9 T: `+ f/ xDesign and Architecture co-op1 x' {* E6 k4 p
• Excellent co-programs
. X/ `, v8 C$ `( f* x• Direct competition for internships and jobs
. C8 w- K8 S( u9 W6 u9 I" n# C; I• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students* O3 }/ ]# u K: d0 _
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense
$ d- b- t7 \0 _! K6 l0 o
! k+ I& A: j5 ^! WUniversity of Virginia – Landscape Architecture
, S. Y9 d; P3 m( r6 `& L* z( M• Attention to design and small town urbanism, j$ t$ D, @) Y& r0 |
• Quality of faculty4 ~- ~/ `; J2 [6 @4 y* s( I
• Students can choose from three tracts of study/ ]: E8 m/ Z3 o1 t- Z( ^, g* h8 w( o
• Good design research base in sustainable design
+ Z6 n3 S! Q- j& ?7 E4 g• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
2 D( F5 Z% f1 o! ^8 a" X% x, j
3 B4 D U! E1 T+ m% Q" L) B, J" F2 c, D. I
Design Programs Most Admired% P j3 r! i7 @# w) k
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
2 f' K( I2 r4 P J- w" ]* ?8 X6 j/ a
Architecture. { i1 t8 H, o" L& {3 s _, f
1 Harvard University1 N+ ^% @! I/ z! y. L8 H
2 Auburn University6 g' v5 ~9 l5 o* T* @
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
; [! _3 D- ]( R) L+ V5 k# M4 University of Michigan; M/ E% E# e# L7 q4 P x6 i* P8 O
5 Columbia University
5 G- d8 ~+ y& W2 _8 C$ ` n6 University of Pennsylvania
. {' I7 A$ T H$ t2 |) S. nUniversity of Virginia
8 v4 q6 h! e; a4 H" Z8 S7 Cornell University
4 e1 p2 E4 O: \/ A5 c. q9 nGeorgia Institute of Technology& Z5 n! L J* q4 o8 [* h- W" R/ S. ]
University of California, Berkeley
6 S5 n$ I3 c# T, ]University of Minnesota
" E: b" D. @+ U% S4 p# fYale University
0 U# Z m* m1 [9 H9 V( w4 p
3 }( @) ]/ c# M( T; ULandscape Architecture: g7 }/ y0 z# t( I4 j; ]+ c
1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
1 C* i8 s- z9 ]9 d! g! A/ yHarvard University' Q# O6 J( k2 x) \7 ^
University of Virginia
1 ~2 t; I$ n1 m6 M# }$ }3 T. ^ E& H4 Pennsylvania State University
: m- c7 p7 |+ P0 l) j$ OUniversity of Georgia, p3 S: h. u/ ~7 @# r: C4 p, @
University of Pennsylvania
" v/ s$ g7 E; ` G% j2 N$ \+ `7 California Polytechnic State University,1 v4 H4 [- h) y) x. t4 r
San Luis Obispo. d# b8 k4 V5 M# Z6 h* u; t
Kansas State University
; ~2 F9 \6 \* m0 o& b# X. C7 |Michigan State University: I- G- C8 b1 t# o" }5 z
University of California, Davis0 ]5 |! T% `8 x) S4 e
/ v- m8 n. S& |% E- Y
Interior Design
: r! y2 p( W: U7 V W. q5 D' r! f1 University of Cincinnati
# q% x3 Z- e( x( O5 z4 m2 Rhode Island School of Design) `" V5 t, Q, v; S4 Y
3 Arizona State University
" T3 A6 p) y/ q: G3 s+ d+ x- D! ?% F! vCornell University
/ }$ s N4 k* q- z5 n3 o# VKansas State University
$ O! D# \& `2 X$ E4 r9 z6 Art Center College of Design. l0 J4 b: `% B: F
Art Institute of Chicago) S# h9 @1 C4 U4 L7 h3 V
Florida State University
+ R$ j3 I" o/ c4 s+ g0 hLawrence Technological University/ b7 J( {. Z! N, [+ C, M
Pratt Institute. O3 I$ t$ \2 ?, W
University of Oregon. G! l: v' J# S& d
; f, ^0 ^4 B3 }3 |7 M3 V4 QDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
! q+ f' H- Z5 @8 E
& l- R B' N1 X) E) n P+ pUNDERGRADUATE
Z0 I3 [0 k/ Z) d7 Y' c! z& ]1 Cornell University
) L$ g: M: w# l2 z2 Rice University
D: [# |; m! b( j, b& h3 Syracuse University
/ ?* I# H8 U# _/ U: @" A D7 v5 Y4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University t% L8 C6 K2 S* s& f% \
5 Rhode Island School of Design
2 m6 M. H+ D# W* t* m i6 Auburn University
+ B y+ K: h1 p4 N6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- r) h8 l [; U( A6 University of Kansas*
3 ^8 d l a$ f5 O$ @9 University of Texas at Austin
L( M1 Q- r' v- h10 Carnegie Mellon University
" b5 h1 O: ^ x11 University of Notre Dame5 l' j' @. o' q
12 Kansas State University0 M* m ?+ _0 j# C+ s, O# W
13 Illinois Institute of Technology0 V8 R8 N. ^ [( z8 |
14 Iowa State University4 @, t; W/ X+ q+ h6 q1 W P2 \
14 Pratt Institute p) y" F+ d8 h% b' Q! e" T
14 University of Oregon
$ C' V$ B! i8 o1 d5 Z14 University of Southern California
% Q, S. ?1 P9 r5 O0 p
$ x5 i! p6 U+ SDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007
; Q& A) l, u. M) Y3 a8 Z& G. {3 ~8 H/ B4 @$ v# W
GRADUATE% q: \( s% [' ^2 ?6 Q* ^, h7 n
1 Harvard University/ q3 L( g( S# K$ f& p& k3 C3 P
2 University of Cincinnati
& j% r8 b8 |# F: |1 N3 Yale University# r3 U7 U1 w2 ~2 `1 j
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, F( D- i- C) i1 W8 S$ f
5 University of Virginia
1 F& a7 @. R8 y6 Cornell University: v7 v+ k& e; a/ Y5 { J
6 Rice University
% s# o# S0 q" ]6 Washington University in St. Louis1 \9 K) j. `9 I! X" \& r) C
9 Columbia University
; M/ x# f# |) J. ?2 P10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
h p/ F! ]' {2 y5 [0 x6 ^5 n2 N11 Princeton University' b; l9 P/ I. v$ [$ P# B
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign7 _3 \6 u9 D$ T i8 m2 I) F
11 University of Texas at Austin+ s; ~- Q% i2 {+ J6 u5 H
14 Rhode Island School of Design
5 n9 K# S' c0 A; G7 e; B! g) R: ^& K15 University of Michigan, s8 ]1 o9 E/ H& P
# w3 X& Q* C8 h* ?DesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs8 k0 L' E9 G5 M& |- q7 b1 G
?) S/ t7 I: v1 n7 h( ^) S8 b$ p
UNDERGRADUATE
d0 Z j# \5 b/ c) jSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
; x7 H1 b1 x) u" `8 rCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 - H- v7 @7 t9 c0 } v
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10 6 |* ]" H; i7 Z) Z; A1 _+ @
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 -
( O- v# {0 |4 Y Z5 w6 gVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
: d" Y% @/ P; S1 U$ yRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
; ~, f2 S+ ]3 L7 IAuburn University 6 15 - - 10 ; i, h4 T* g2 Z8 K) `
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 2
& s/ N0 {; S X+ X' V* j; oUniversity of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -9 b4 m" }0 H2 x
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6
0 z' @0 x8 ]' p# gCarnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
7 B a$ L$ A; xUniversity of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
6 Q! Y3 r2 O3 _0 S+ ^; r- ]3 zKansas State University 12 5 6 8 60 T5 o+ s6 U+ N# R4 V. X4 x1 G
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -. C# R8 x! h" E p& k, z" h9 \
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -
( m {: g( i6 T) ?. k$ b, Q LPratt Institute 14 10 - - -! }5 T( ]* U `" x% ~7 E. E
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -7 {; u: V; Q* w% }
University of Southern California 14 - - - -
4 Z1 L' Q* L, z/ S' \1 u: LBall State University‡ - - - - 14. E5 n$ d) `8 b6 s
Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -8 ^6 m+ p B; s4 z1 K$ M
& R) r7 W: B0 ?0 Z% c% d
$ L- R7 b. N' h1 ^
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
K2 o8 U- `; ~9 @6 B5 R! ?; Y/ |
UNDERGRADUATE
5 p1 x6 N$ B* N, ` R1 Louisiana State University2 u4 i n. F& a7 h9 O2 p' |& L
1 Pennsylvania State University
! l, \+ h9 e* A F. t3 Kansas State University5 l+ z6 U/ s7 R& S
4 University of Georgia
( G% x: P, ^0 U% Q4 c5 Ball State University& z3 n( t* m+ r& V; ~; `
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
0 t/ f# C: m+ t1 Z* c6 s5 Cornell University
, b/ i- i2 p0 o! ^6 d5 Purdue University7 E6 [' z: Y, Z% j! a5 }
9 Ohio State University
4 a( [- ~0 [1 {3 A* K% a10 Texas A&M University6 F9 J: V, C6 D* x$ S, r
11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) k4 D5 x( K; @8 @# f$ j0 v
12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
5 j$ U! v2 I7 B4 w6 J. |* n13 Michigan State University' J0 h8 C6 b# F* C6 V. l8 Q
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign9 P R3 p% B2 X% _2 j! h' w
15 Iowa State University/ x; \: W) A* c/ ^9 F5 i
15 University of Oregon [3 v! F ?0 o
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison
/ h; h: ?) N; S5 j
% ?# C0 D" d {4 v9 [Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007. `: e/ R9 t* h) t. R2 S* q7 I
' B, z- K I" L( ]/ qGRADUATE
+ e6 H2 P% @- P9 z" I1 Harvard University
6 ^) V: h4 @+ R2 Kansas State University4 K. y- B8 N% Q9 y% d8 B0 N% B
3 University of Georgia
! e! i3 ]- m1 }9 J f) `4 University of Pennsylvania) |( W) n+ k# m) ]: l6 Y9 c
5 Louisiana State University. Q! Q3 E' ?1 M' y
6 Rhode Island School of Design
+ t: L$ E& a1 T `# |6 University of Michigan' r. b' V5 g7 f" m) [: H7 w( |, _
6 University of Virginia
- U& z" f/ d7 Q* N! i2 q9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY! Y1 v0 n P$ h9 g7 n+ ^1 l
9 Ohio State University
9 n7 p* j0 @/ c0 m11 Cornell University
; x# e) [8 O8 N3 D" y# e- N11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign/ g3 q+ U5 T0 W& _: ~. e9 {
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona! g G1 ` \% F0 E# L( p
13 Texas A&M University u O6 X1 S% L; y8 T: M1 j
13 University of California, Berkeley! \+ Y" v, ^, ]0 k0 u9 Z3 |4 [
13 University of Oregon- I! P' m% f% f4 x/ d; F) n! a
+ `; k. M2 w0 B, M+ d$ X, j. G$ w
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
' J4 H# B0 I8 K* U2 w/ `9 v8 }This ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
$ o T7 M$ ~/ r1 m$ E9 G9 H* z, D& _# _* w
Design:
8 E7 x6 d4 y* H, ~7 R6 l1. Harvard University
' ~; q/ S9 k |1 q. T8 n2. Kansas State University, }& M" e" n& z- d- w
3. Louisiana State University4 ?; j# E- R6 V& h
4. Pennsylvania State University
5 E1 C) S' ?% G( d1 m! Q5. Ball State University7 g+ y, P) Y7 p: @: e7 F
# L6 P: W8 |0 M
Analysis and planning:
$ ?6 w1 j8 b# ?3 @7 ]" w" m( h2 p1. Kansas State University4 X; ~# l. \2 y
2. Pennsylvania State University
, v% R. K" w7 n* h3. Louisiana State University' s# P8 ~' J* Q, c6 w; Q) o
University of Georgia
B; ^4 ]* v) |8 H6 t* @+ r4 L- X5. Harvard University
( N* o/ N X. Z( } u' Z: a' z/ A- f7 ^
Construction methods and materials:8 W# t5 [2 [- ~1 d! }, V1 K
1. Kansas State University
* ?8 ]* h. k$ t2. University of Georgia
0 H! r$ E% F( K3 x7 T3 R' J3. Louisiana State University
/ d- m0 V3 p" U V' p/ wPennsylvania State University$ w0 u. X4 A( j, X* M( T8 E
Purdue University, ^5 v4 d4 d4 L2 k! j% @
) ^4 D8 r- B5 N6 C
Computer applications:& o7 {( Q" g# N7 A7 Y. g% X
1. Harvard University
& I/ A! a( v; `2. Pennsylvania State University
( |2 b) |! O+ `2 k+ O3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
- G& P9 z8 ]7 HPurdue University" ^6 r+ V2 \8 ~9 o
University of Georgia p' o: a3 `$ Z) l
8 y/ q7 [8 D( E `2 d& M' iResearch and theory:; Y0 g8 K( q3 @
1. Harvard University3 K' @: l0 ]! V O0 p G4 \
2. Pennsylvania State University
* w7 x" k I; K4 p) e; ] \, g6 s3. Kansas State University3 c+ }% b( m# d' J: c
University of Georgia( {9 j# a( W/ B9 _8 Z
5. University of Oregon+ ]! C/ L3 @* D
University of Virginia
0 Z) ?7 A: J) ~! R+ \5 v3 q0 F$ Z6 ]( I+ u. ~/ I% u
Security design principles:
, n, m" l+ M. x4 {5 K+ N9 z( r+ A/ i1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo% E* O1 c6 i Y8 H$ [
Kansas State University0 m4 ^: z# d+ k+ H0 d1 x D2 {! {
University of Georgia% X- G. W$ V" R) _3 P! J* b3 D
4. Ball State University
9 U {. b0 U/ R/ J# S4 j% F! d5 q0 t5. Pennsylvania State University+ i# J8 R- h2 O3 R( J5 Q( U$ A
: q. c8 x$ z( X* X
Sustainable design practices and principles:1 y. c# L# K* o6 L
1. University of Georgia5 M; M/ k6 ], b' r5 ~
University of Oregon- P% Y& |9 L3 @% W+ t/ A' t/ ]
3. Pennsylvania State University
. x( c+ f* X. L, \4. Ball State University3 o9 e2 Y4 ~9 n7 j
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo( y" G! D6 v/ _! a3 w: c& n
Harvard University9 f; W* T7 K9 ^* \
Kansas State University& E7 G$ B4 J+ S. r
Michigan State University( M' R' D" k: G3 Z( I. A
& d6 s7 F; m# h3 X1 {
[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
architecture rank graduate
-
architecture-programs-with-the-most-AIA-ACSA
-
archtecture-skill-assess
-
landscape-architecture-historical-survey.
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|