- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2b03/a2b03af3158ca62272fd36f10e5ff104243a53e0" alt="Rank: 11" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2b03/a2b03af3158ca62272fd36f10e5ff104243a53e0" alt="Rank: 11" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b929/2b929dbd86119be916cf69f4e4ca7cb9b576c573" alt="Rank: 11" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77631/77631f98b078d980d18926e02f043dc6703bb611" alt="Rank: 11"
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=102340444 y8 v/ r, d! h/ z1 l
9 e; n6 Z+ P/ ]4 ?
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。 |" l- u5 `8 ]2 W7 X: X
6 _8 D: w; K1 l& u3 RQualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
0 |2 X. L7 X9 m" v: f# I3 y0 P
, n6 w& T9 K" WHarvard University – Architecture; U) W2 S/ o! l9 J
• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
, |6 Y+ d# c T! Gand Urban Design
4 I0 m+ k5 a+ E• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline
1 H; g0 A; y7 `( _ S% _• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth" }7 s: k: `0 A5 g
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought
/ Y# `/ v4 H7 q, ^# @4 p6 r5 e# ^• Breadth of world view4 z" p1 N; i! k- v
• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice9 ]$ T$ j" @3 e7 }# N; l# s
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students
+ l& f# A! v: o+ P$ V, W• Good balance of theory and practice, very international
5 y( b. `3 X6 Q! }# Q6 f% m: }2 \( @6 w+ V/ @
University of Cincinnati – Interior Design3 `+ f8 X3 j; @! T4 e9 I7 a4 {/ H
• Active connections to the profession+ t* I8 W+ h' Z9 L4 e7 h0 Q; \
• Strength of internship program1 r6 _* O% T: s
• CIDA similar program' C4 e6 _3 ?, O# d9 D
• Strong technology base# \4 A7 i) D3 z5 ~ r
• Strong overall undergraduate program
, b+ n# p. F) B' Z4 T( K- W• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior8 R& s+ G9 q8 o$ `
Design and Architecture co-op# G9 v2 E; s+ @. L* C/ o. W9 J
• Excellent co-programs3 A5 \( B; U) W* |, J! B
• Direct competition for internships and jobs
8 y6 U% ]. h2 e& g" @ e! a- B• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students4 |2 T1 I" o @' ], E3 P3 [ G5 h
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense# }: x5 K5 b5 a5 H! D" W' C
3 n; E8 _2 P; r( l7 d5 vUniversity of Virginia – Landscape Architecture" w8 I) v, C8 g% e9 ]
• Attention to design and small town urbanism
5 o5 p& P( t% _% {9 x7 Z1 M• Quality of faculty- z: q8 k$ C% Q% ]" E9 z
• Students can choose from three tracts of study
. [0 [" `+ w" k7 b0 t• Good design research base in sustainable design
, {& I6 C/ S3 P• Consistent and value oriented educational mission' f5 a7 J7 _8 s) }; R U3 S- p
7 a' a% s" G3 M# D
9 Q% N+ j7 j( w9 O5 n$ G& TDesign Programs Most Admired# |6 s% b- y7 l; @0 j. r
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
0 k6 f% F/ _& p; }- m2 z# Q+ _# K
3 Y6 Q" b1 H( T' m% ~Architecture- L$ |+ D, j% i
1 Harvard University
8 L. {0 f% }$ f+ l2 Auburn University
* P9 _# j& }* X, _Massachusetts Institute of Technology
7 S5 k4 t$ A+ m% @7 P, W: q# j2 Y4 University of Michigan2 e' W8 F3 { ?8 H( n# A7 ^
5 Columbia University6 t: N3 Y% q. C. J0 ~ g' i
6 University of Pennsylvania8 D% ^. ?1 Y0 \- v
University of Virginia
% l* p7 E& f" s' @5 ?1 c2 c7 Cornell University" m' p1 ?) `( K
Georgia Institute of Technology
6 k G" c: L# |. S AUniversity of California, Berkeley( b" l4 O& z- y: |1 r. w7 P9 K
University of Minnesota! I a2 t9 [' |1 P) h3 G
Yale University
p8 _+ Q% m6 Q4 v
- [: `& T6 d$ y- s8 NLandscape Architecture
2 `5 K2 g2 k1 y$ Z, k$ E0 p# n+ o; f1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada3 H" }1 ]! r" X4 j0 @+ d
Harvard University
+ u# v0 I. s1 q7 f9 hUniversity of Virginia
8 ]& u4 d/ N- G2 T1 @; C0 H4 Pennsylvania State University Y- j! M5 F$ Z2 z, A
University of Georgia. @- ], O: l* z X: q
University of Pennsylvania
% a9 H0 p( Y" b5 t0 r7 California Polytechnic State University,# r4 E0 s, o# _; l t" i: l, _
San Luis Obispo
) o% I" p3 ]# [3 C" t3 |Kansas State University- |! a$ \% [! {9 [) F, x
Michigan State University
( J) e6 \3 k6 U4 }University of California, Davis3 j/ M8 D$ ^/ I
$ y& ~* `) o! C# rInterior Design0 I* _% H& t( c/ r3 l; Y; m# m- k
1 University of Cincinnati& e: M7 P5 v! q& _! O" T9 I/ b; `* r
2 Rhode Island School of Design3 c! C% R* t3 d U* d
3 Arizona State University6 u1 P- ^8 v( M/ y( {" V2 _
Cornell University; n( g; c* K! ?. a0 H
Kansas State University
; P/ g' o- S# i |6 Art Center College of Design
l: J! b2 I' n8 x4 J' @Art Institute of Chicago
6 J* c1 J+ G0 j; t' ~Florida State University
5 C6 Y( s( C3 T, g1 [! j0 g; ^Lawrence Technological University; o* t2 y. ?$ |. w
Pratt Institute
1 B2 m( Y3 S4 t% _% p! D& AUniversity of Oregon9 i$ c" V( X9 w- ~
/ a- V3 ?' |/ o' _
DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007) k$ u1 ?6 j" m- A' O# b. T/ @
$ v- `2 H+ v' {( ?/ O
UNDERGRADUATE; p& O# h0 a7 `3 ~9 S
1 Cornell University
+ r- x0 Z" Q' p" m* H. l. i& s5 u' t2 Rice University
: ]0 T# M- E+ W9 U& h: v4 ~6 O- T3 Syracuse University% Z- B9 O+ q- |" x$ _/ w
4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University- E1 J- A7 y, {3 X; U4 l0 _
5 Rhode Island School of Design& n0 h1 M* e& V( y/ d( j Z
6 Auburn University, t% Z+ K8 u$ X
6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo6 b1 y4 Z+ S! m; e |
6 University of Kansas*
+ E0 ^# X% w( B7 f' I Q h9 University of Texas at Austin* @9 B2 @0 }4 b- n
10 Carnegie Mellon University
7 F. _* w8 N! T6 K. p. u; o11 University of Notre Dame
% x. c# R% i+ o8 T4 I% ^% G7 C12 Kansas State University
5 O0 B1 F4 K) A, G13 Illinois Institute of Technology
" [5 T6 m; ?: \+ ]0 ]9 [+ O14 Iowa State University& _* L; g0 T( W' q0 ]0 X4 w* G
14 Pratt Institute
; e" t5 w2 q Y14 University of Oregon" } a6 U+ F: x
14 University of Southern California& C i4 P K* K+ |& ^8 P7 x; S+ W
0 x! g' V! N5 D9 S! E _# pDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 20075 D" C( x' a# {
1 l1 H+ m, K0 [5 m8 _: w6 u
GRADUATE2 G, b. I3 e/ S0 d9 w. [+ c& x
1 Harvard University
5 }5 M( c- B7 w2 University of Cincinnati: K8 |$ h- Q% T3 g1 y- W- A/ @
3 Yale University- T$ |% @9 N/ `
4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
l. T* f% B1 u3 q" n9 u5 n5 University of Virginia
9 Q- q; ~4 r- v; Z3 o6 Cornell University
- h1 m* ]) B0 m7 o6 Y8 j- N/ [; K$ `6 Rice University" }: d* F: g. A& P
6 Washington University in St. Louis: ]3 c/ Q, S; s" ^! x$ @
9 Columbia University, p1 Z, R! B. Z4 U$ R
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
$ E4 u: K- m; I6 t6 s5 Z11 Princeton University! x# H2 \6 h( J, B
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign9 e8 f. c8 I- S6 }
11 University of Texas at Austin. { @5 `6 N: @4 b; Y9 |
14 Rhode Island School of Design
" O( v0 W. K9 ?- G, i9 u- x5 T15 University of Michigan
. H, N( J0 S6 O4 T
# n* n8 T& s7 B4 K2 F. y& aDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
N* K. F3 P; e8 Y) m5 G* N/ V+ R- o6 z, [0 M/ n
UNDERGRADUATE & {9 W3 T& J0 E& j f! I7 d
School 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003
' c+ M$ a; C$ _. m2 e" C/ y/ lCornell University 1 1 1 2 4 ( M# O: b# \1 h! o% N$ b$ V) G& ?" I
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10 0 ?& o) C. g' Y$ U1 {- N
Syracuse University 3 7 5 4 - / k: c1 K: ]1 [! W/ L/ p
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14
2 ]% p1 f7 ?% [/ ^& {+ G% XRhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 -
7 |. e' d+ @" `/ F0 SAuburn University 6 15 - - 10
% p0 E& ]+ b4 S5 l7 f) v( s+ c7 T5 KCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 29 |2 b" q' U4 x& z' E
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -2 `/ o( c! u" G6 M
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 6/ W, T' ? E* f" k" S- j
Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -
! g$ i( s0 W. H# u* [University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -
7 `; z. e- P/ l$ c: d* VKansas State University 12 5 6 8 6! |- J; E6 a+ f. n, C$ F+ U8 e* i
Illinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -: \9 M, H) }% }' r( n1 k
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -* b+ e0 Y; H) ?% q
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -
9 Z1 m7 c1 n; Z+ `1 CUniversity of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -- |8 b. `7 w6 F. P- i0 n
University of Southern California 14 - - - -
, M1 ~1 u6 O4 E1 R: Q& QBall State University‡ - - - - 14
; J/ N1 ^, v G, x' P/ }( bPennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -
- n9 v) |1 N% \4 x" C- C3 P4 |+ J+ L/ R& d0 q
( V: I+ M8 O3 h1 @; A( F& p1 @- \) RTop 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
0 ] Y' q! C5 E) W: A7 p
9 K+ }/ A6 p/ N" ~( _9 D I2 JUNDERGRADUATE
+ b9 x& E( ]# }6 _7 ]. j1 Louisiana State University
, a$ T% S5 p1 g8 b4 i% `1 Pennsylvania State University
/ z! L. W: A+ A( a! o4 A n+ ^3 Kansas State University# B; @ k5 t# G6 L, J
4 University of Georgia
6 d) c% b8 L5 [3 l/ B: I5 Ball State University0 p6 G/ V. ]% E/ t* @
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
& m- y* q8 ~8 y6 j) F( |5 Cornell University5 c9 z. l2 `, W
5 Purdue University; L `5 n/ U* H' V+ Z" N
9 Ohio State University* D3 r/ P6 H5 f4 S
10 Texas A&M University
0 M8 O$ `2 N* E9 J) { o+ e" b11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
o" N) y; Y. f$ J( y12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
% _$ |% V" Q5 n13 Michigan State University
2 x. x8 J' _: _13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
+ d8 g, z0 @) F2 _. P/ {15 Iowa State University
6 W7 i- c+ n. e% d2 s; h: _* g2 V15 University of Oregon
O& v$ h" V3 z15 University of Wisconsin-Madison) r% {& V/ W a# \# g
6 D Z7 P x% B+ U' ^Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
# f0 j8 z# B$ Y3 A
d& @7 r" F" ~GRADUATE
/ o$ N; x; V* W$ l# |- S/ ], F" x: a1 Harvard University7 n6 o! n- y$ \; w% y
2 Kansas State University3 K2 ?) n% T/ w
3 University of Georgia, j2 t2 x7 X0 Y# w
4 University of Pennsylvania
7 V$ w- o& P7 r* ?/ T3 R x2 \5 Louisiana State University
4 [# s$ V; h+ A3 q6 Rhode Island School of Design
, Q. ^" A0 ~ A% |; Y+ v2 [9 M7 z8 \. |6 University of Michigan
, d+ @6 D( {6 Z/ C, ~* [8 a6 University of Virginia
# r3 p# }" R6 f1 d" \1 O9 K: F8 m9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
7 x( K W% }. L; j9 Ohio State University
! w/ j' c2 r: f& V ~( j8 c11 Cornell University+ e5 Q! u' ^3 c0 G. g0 W; R; P
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign6 w' ]& c. S w& D* }8 h" n
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
9 o# l0 p5 t& \* B( M7 Q6 _ ]9 ^13 Texas A&M University+ g3 t i2 x. a$ x
13 University of California, Berkeley
" ?) n+ G7 v& S8 r0 [: A13 University of Oregon6 U c) o) q" y4 w$ }2 y a* l; E" ~% Q3 h
9 @) H- H8 H3 h. n+ `; S2 l
Skills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
: P7 L- T5 y1 J; o3 r* j9 qThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
0 M2 G! R$ y6 P# H" N1 \0 Q) ?
& R* r) ~/ N+ t* t, z; H/ L% XDesign:) M. y9 g' y o9 F8 w
1. Harvard University
\" k4 V: a: `$ @2. Kansas State University2 G4 y7 L0 H, q% k: G! L: \4 X
3. Louisiana State University
& v; |; R* {/ y: T4. Pennsylvania State University
) |$ L0 F* K1 J+ o- z+ x7 T5. Ball State University* e% C3 U6 D% [$ }& {6 K5 u
$ H, V5 I# E) Z7 ^% I! p3 I# `- q
Analysis and planning:
3 ~' b$ i% _. t9 X1. Kansas State University% d9 G" N& r* }( W1 W8 r6 X8 v
2. Pennsylvania State University# Y5 t a( _6 p2 L: ]
3. Louisiana State University
7 n; y# o: u, Y: eUniversity of Georgia
# g1 S/ @1 o8 b/ V0 F1 H! V5. Harvard University
1 f. \- T' B) l5 ]; ^) }7 [( @- F$ z3 W8 k+ H9 A6 P# e4 j' R9 f
Construction methods and materials:5 z; B- S9 y0 Z; \4 d& b
1. Kansas State University. h- m7 _0 l+ ^) S
2. University of Georgia" F7 y+ {+ s5 G. J
3. Louisiana State University7 K! \: f2 y# a* P# @
Pennsylvania State University
/ _" ~/ X! A/ oPurdue University; Y$ A1 a4 j% Z; ~7 }% B' y
; G+ q8 Z; u& BComputer applications:, Q# z& k1 _ J
1. Harvard University5 o: b$ P* h# P# _" R1 L* v
2. Pennsylvania State University
5 h, M4 p6 Z( L" P/ i: K+ p3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo w' m. z' F6 J: Z* A
Purdue University
( a3 S+ u5 ^; e* s5 N% j- }; `University of Georgia
$ ]4 U2 _; ^2 o1 Y: w; X" j
/ z( e- G+ e4 \' C; yResearch and theory:
3 Q* g+ Z$ ^, y1. Harvard University1 Z! {) U6 E" E' I
2. Pennsylvania State University
8 e; l( e1 O! f% G. j# _1 ~ `" [: z3. Kansas State University' E" W" s2 }0 i/ ^$ k% ]# S
University of Georgia1 `7 G+ l- \% X1 S
5. University of Oregon
& L/ y: c# {4 J M1 D8 f- PUniversity of Virginia8 v# c# \1 P$ t% u6 x
: ?/ W- M! _" R9 XSecurity design principles:! O6 a9 o0 T( W! a
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo4 Y/ w9 R; W5 n: q7 ^: c
Kansas State University8 N( t1 m0 ^8 s& a$ S1 B9 ]5 n
University of Georgia
6 w( f5 r C* v7 Q! }4. Ball State University; E. ^, J; o* a) \1 f
5. Pennsylvania State University. ?4 j& J4 D; J3 W* P% ?) G3 v
; E/ _2 e, D3 G) @$ RSustainable design practices and principles:; R2 U* p. X4 I6 j
1. University of Georgia# D+ [7 i7 G- @. n
University of Oregon
$ F6 L' _+ d# @ a% m4 s5 i l7 E' T3. Pennsylvania State University8 Y7 n; ^% P, W
4. Ball State University+ ?' N) u+ [2 j/ {/ a
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
) f5 |1 |4 {4 a3 v* F& iHarvard University
! ^, B% L1 z: M8 FKansas State University
3 {* |% W5 @8 s. QMichigan State University' p$ ^! b0 A% p {3 ~! e8 y3 K* ]
) P0 O, E1 }2 N w5 W4 K[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|