- 最后登录
- 2016-3-27
- 在线时间
- 2663 小时
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 声望
- 963
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 258
- 精华
- 44
- 积分
- 13922
- UID
- 202495
   
- 声望
- 963
- 寄托币
- 18976
- 注册时间
- 2005-3-25
- 精华
- 44
- 帖子
- 258
|
http://www.newsmth.net/bbscon.php?bid=104&id=10234044( {8 O* r d9 J# e2 T7 x$ {
& v2 [5 ]+ \1 E- Y5 C2 a S
上面的地址可以下载到本书。下面是一些内容的提要。附件里可以找到排名的图片。
" m% W& F% _9 B c0 }7 q$ }
5 J% y, M" _( V, P/ c, |. eQualities of Most Admired Design Program, as determined by Deans and Chairs – 2007
: P7 P$ {9 K# ^# t, F$ v6 z% h( G" t' N
Harvard University – Architecture
( H6 _+ o5 L0 x• Great faculty – setting the bar in regards to theory and critical thinking in Architecture
/ M3 |! Y8 v" Y9 n8 Dand Urban Design
+ g- H0 i2 J0 O! [# G1 B• Exceptional resources; strong ties with current conceptual trends in the discipline, m) f h# D: Z1 c3 D1 A
• Clear leadership in developing innovative academic depth) U2 g# K3 P( f) ^
• Excellent faculty, ability to support diverse schools of thought
; A+ G# M7 M+ x3 K# h0 I h• Breadth of world view
$ Q( {+ I- l: b# y" n) w5 A3 g• Stresses design within a rigorous curriculum leading to practice( x6 X" @+ L9 _
• Excellent students due to faculty and quality of incoming students( h; A/ E; I: }- {8 q8 c7 c
• Good balance of theory and practice, very international& O9 Z1 V( U. u5 Y- k6 s u
6 E+ B+ H$ y# M f* Q7 N0 aUniversity of Cincinnati – Interior Design
2 Z8 Y5 B3 s8 O% n• Active connections to the profession
" a5 a4 Q' z5 ]" s E4 q4 }• Strength of internship program
& l5 I" H$ ?; |1 u7 t• CIDA similar program
: f& {0 j4 `; D$ m+ D• Strong technology base! J/ z7 T& Q, h! V+ c
• Strong overall undergraduate program
( M6 a& M# R7 H4 M t5 n- V: l• Sustained quality in Interior Design education – close relationship between Interior1 q' [! k( j7 C: q
Design and Architecture co-op
) c; H2 t3 n" [• Excellent co-programs& _4 z% B9 _2 v5 T% m- A
• Direct competition for internships and jobs7 `: L% e6 o( F+ I* y
• Co-op/internship program as a requirement for all students- Q# {& h$ N! |8 P: T: e0 x4 b- f8 V
• Graduates appear to have good practical sense& Q' o$ z) Q8 y, w8 I/ b
6 u5 Z8 s2 X: Y$ X" X& t
University of Virginia – Landscape Architecture3 u# D+ e' G% I# |. z; l
• Attention to design and small town urbanism) x" z, G! Y1 H' S* F" O6 D
• Quality of faculty
. D5 C- T3 D, A2 A7 d1 {• Students can choose from three tracts of study
5 q- h1 b6 G$ M/ e6 E$ T5 }1 G• Good design research base in sustainable design
3 Q7 \. C, g' Q" D1 `6 v7 i• Consistent and value oriented educational mission
* V# A, u4 ] Z( c" @* w% x9 i" |# Z
( \7 v+ Z4 x ~. r- c: M8 {( t* s3 D- |
8 ?6 Q' B# X5 h ` P( wDesign Programs Most Admired3 [6 q c8 r- e* q
by Deans and Department Chairs – 2007
+ u( F3 E5 R! H3 r6 K( J
& B: c5 B' F. B' R( r6 o1 v# mArchitecture6 h2 Z; ]# g8 X7 W
1 Harvard University
0 G4 r9 g6 m3 q6 J/ e2 Auburn University
! e' p" i( G3 u0 @ X/ F, T3 yMassachusetts Institute of Technology
$ O$ S+ t6 g `, a: \4 University of Michigan5 O7 `) Q8 b) U9 Y! o
5 Columbia University0 S' D6 H; I' j+ ^) P4 n' M+ y
6 University of Pennsylvania
. `$ N' [# H/ @ eUniversity of Virginia+ H( e# ~. P) W
7 Cornell University
+ v S: L! g+ |5 XGeorgia Institute of Technology
% P8 l. n9 ^7 j' n0 NUniversity of California, Berkeley& u n' ]3 K; I! h
University of Minnesota
' X: {* ?2 @# A4 n# bYale University
) } X' A! [: x& [0 Y0 e/ n3 y
* X) f& p; N- I5 G SLandscape Architecture
|: C1 C/ q6 e+ S6 a- V6 w1 Guelph University – Ontario, Canada
! Q+ G2 O c$ ^: l: V' MHarvard University/ n% D, Q ~' F8 ?/ k6 R! u- f
University of Virginia& w% n8 B1 K# ~( P/ V8 o( o7 J; t# L* U
4 Pennsylvania State University; T7 R* g- z8 M0 q8 j( T. X
University of Georgia
7 W: D7 q6 E3 w3 z! QUniversity of Pennsylvania
5 O! g9 @) C4 D" [: b V/ Y7 California Polytechnic State University,5 t: H O9 G. c( C$ G( y
San Luis Obispo) h3 ]7 }0 ]% W1 ~: F Y: }
Kansas State University
3 c2 }$ ~$ _* ?, EMichigan State University
9 Z; P" C$ H3 W2 V) E4 i mUniversity of California, Davis: i7 h* x0 C" k( c/ f. @5 y0 f
4 L8 m6 h) o% R: a9 p9 w/ `Interior Design! v) { M1 d7 K& ?$ f2 M
1 University of Cincinnati0 B3 P& Q7 U5 A
2 Rhode Island School of Design+ a5 G4 ]- B6 y% g
3 Arizona State University
( y5 V4 n) c& l# k+ Z! w$ J4 yCornell University4 K9 |: S6 D3 [* B' N% x
Kansas State University2 @2 t3 t5 v8 [0 \1 Q3 K
6 Art Center College of Design
0 q' N: X0 N# [* O, o; o" y# FArt Institute of Chicago5 |: k( r9 `+ o/ \7 a0 {; E+ H
Florida State University& R8 Z$ D( x% V' n6 P
Lawrence Technological University
1 N4 y c- n8 x6 y4 iPratt Institute# ]+ @6 p$ ^& i1 M8 C& o+ a" ]0 u
University of Oregon$ [# B2 k. M B8 f- \- n" T
9 [# |5 B& ]- H( Z& X0 j; [DesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007# g# w1 [3 ]5 }, t6 e
5 z! g% X( j6 D; M# F+ j0 O, B) gUNDERGRADUATE
8 _9 K& J9 f, h4 w1 Cornell University8 J6 h2 C4 f' N" N/ K/ H' a% E
2 Rice University
8 b5 ~# b5 S, r4 A" g, G3 Syracuse University
& j4 l9 k2 h4 B. l0 f' A4 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University# ^% Z% G& \. q$ l: Y8 p5 e# y
5 Rhode Island School of Design
, v+ ?6 j L7 ?6 Auburn University
5 j8 P9 [" f5 M8 o. t6 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
0 H4 ^% |! [1 l! z5 }6 University of Kansas*
3 u h0 g+ @" {, R, w- n) M2 Y* L: A9 University of Texas at Austin
9 F! p q& @+ a: w6 }7 @3 S10 Carnegie Mellon University6 O- S; ~* i5 e$ C; ~1 X1 y
11 University of Notre Dame: I: Y3 B1 a7 j& |3 n
12 Kansas State University
+ _9 q" x9 n- G0 _, t. U3 j13 Illinois Institute of Technology% P5 @7 p' ~* }9 S% m
14 Iowa State University
8 }* M4 v$ v( Z. o+ n14 Pratt Institute, n7 S8 d8 p7 Z6 B& p; \. T2 t
14 University of Oregon3 n; w; R9 @" y( w
14 University of Southern California
- W. P2 O ]9 V4 z! o
0 v$ T' s# n3 J+ l8 _, `" L; `$ ZDesignIntelligence® Top 15 Architecture Programs – 2007/ Q, Q1 B! y( [, }7 F
- s1 N& A& m% x. Q) s! H _
GRADUATE1 u( U4 [/ `" e: g% Z3 h$ c
1 Harvard University; W u3 L8 g! n/ U
2 University of Cincinnati# Q! A, Z# I# B( t/ F' D
3 Yale University
- |; X6 n# D6 o4 S4 Massachusetts Institute of Technology* r. p" i [, [
5 University of Virginia3 G, v- a8 u; c& v7 l& V% |/ p4 K
6 Cornell University
+ s$ q' S7 N% U$ E( ~6 Rice University
# X& X5 b8 T5 G+ Z( p5 y4 f6 Washington University in St. Louis
* d. g: ]5 Z: ^9 a: @0 N9 s( M3 c& J9 Columbia University, P& u7 U5 A9 O' k1 \9 P/ d1 S
10 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
, U8 X- l! R1 A* w1 r+ v% H* w11 Princeton University4 G' e' K+ O B8 t; w" G l( ]
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign% x; E6 U- U" `% D
11 University of Texas at Austin
( S# g2 W) X0 _: k- \; T/ |14 Rhode Island School of Design3 V3 v! \7 P+ Y$ u
15 University of Michigan+ \& Q0 n8 n+ R4 E6 w" {2 [
8 O1 j" ^! }$ x: IDesignIntelligence® Historical Survey of Leading Architecture Programs
: c- O4 g# g8 D( j ~: p
+ a' P, {/ K' e7 n* W2 O$ }. cUNDERGRADUATE
. z/ T7 w: S9 r- N0 t; i7 \9 fSchool 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 % P6 T8 V" ]$ D9 q, Y" l
Cornell University 1 1 1 2 4 9 d! J. Q8 L' k0 @4 ~0 o) f# i
Rice University 2 3 3 4 10
( ?( M9 M) C7 s% f3 T% QSyracuse University 3 7 5 4 - - Y6 m: p" F7 u/ g5 o( j
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 4 7 10 4 14 " I: V8 z# E/ n* |& ]" s+ N! {3 S2 j
Rhode Island School of Design 5 5 7 4 - $ H: W% h9 m4 }' |" J4 }- H9 C! O
Auburn University 6 15 - - 10 8 N' k9 T: F4 F5 F8 G
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo 6 3 4 3 26 K2 a1 C# o# m' r
University of Kansas‡ 6 13 - - -) o7 q- N3 ]( d. C8 ~
University of Texas at Austin 9 2 8 10 68 }. G( ~" W4 y" j
Carnegie Mellon University 10 9 9 13 -( N! @' K0 @; ^" F
University of Notre Dame 11 12 - 9 -( x2 p; n$ C0 s+ p1 s
Kansas State University 12 5 6 8 6
0 D' a x# J( u4 A( GIllinois Institute of Technology 13 - 13 13 -1 ^5 r& b7 V' V
Iowa State University 14 13 12 11 -0 H! B8 e- t5 N& O, }
Pratt Institute 14 10 - - -& F Y, Q0 X! C% Y8 u9 U7 l
University of Oregon 14 15 11 11 -
: X: i7 L0 x N6 FUniversity of Southern California 14 - - - -) Q; B+ T0 K8 Z# a
Ball State University‡ - - - - 14
! r% R. v- ^8 q; ~Pennsylvania State University - 10 13 - -! e* d7 l9 a' Y. \
, \) g. x$ f$ c/ J9 E
/ t# ^+ G- U! b: b4 q) M
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
9 \2 E2 ^8 z- e8 X3 P# E
- X. Y3 e/ x8 H& w+ x" \UNDERGRADUATE
( @- R* j2 U: o, Z5 g) f1 Louisiana State University( v1 B4 S. D3 Y& d: p
1 Pennsylvania State University
' A/ v, {* {" w3 Kansas State University: J5 H/ S& }: [, c3 r5 C) n" U
4 University of Georgia
: K0 f/ o0 t3 |+ D; C5 Ball State University, T$ v- ?9 G9 A
5 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
1 z, \3 D- f+ y2 Y! Y D" H5 I! T% x, Q5 Cornell University
! D) f* z$ b! I3 t8 O: u/ D) r5 Purdue University: q0 h( ~" j+ M0 m
9 Ohio State University
8 j) F! J/ a- P H8 l10 Texas A&M University
3 f8 ~3 o" D$ {. N11 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
. D8 p/ ~& R0 {) h+ N0 R9 a: y12 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY
2 P' u3 T8 i1 Y0 ^13 Michigan State University2 r8 Q- r) l. N z0 ~. `
13 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: d) C" m: _ g, X$ A" @; u
15 Iowa State University
( l" a v; P+ |15 University of Oregon; `4 q) A7 I! R/ }* M
15 University of Wisconsin-Madison7 S+ R) S# I5 U9 z% t* ~
' }8 K# S' S) P% e
Top 15 Landscape Architecture Programs – 2007
& g6 N' G+ x+ a! w) { z/ k1 c% g3 \# U- v* G) s- Y4 t
GRADUATE0 e$ C9 D& T" C# a
1 Harvard University* @# I, Z' Y4 l! Q/ ]
2 Kansas State University, c1 c5 O5 F( g
3 University of Georgia* o/ T- W9 b, l; Z
4 University of Pennsylvania
+ V& e3 g2 F* Q- B: O* H) G0 H5 Louisiana State University
/ @( `7 W/ O4 F% G! |6 Rhode Island School of Design1 N/ @- k- k6 L6 l+ e
6 University of Michigan
2 D! k* j3 |9 y5 e6 University of Virginia3 m4 q$ t% a ^! C5 N/ K9 r
9 College of Environmental Science and Forestry, SUNY: j" S6 s P. w" w, f/ |4 _+ f
9 Ohio State University
; H' ^# Y; ]2 c6 Y11 Cornell University: }4 l+ f% B* W
11 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign! Z, Y* F/ V2 H; Q; G) m
13 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
9 W: }5 {& i- V& A9 A" X8 N4 T# G13 Texas A&M University# t1 U4 Q7 D7 r7 K( A
13 University of California, Berkeley! n7 h' f% w' ?0 g N
13 University of Oregon
. e' V, L& T0 o( B; c' T/ N5 o$ ]
' L" j2 K; f9 ?7 {# m: b7 T; sSkills Assessment Rankings–Landscape Architecture
! S6 \/ m: l, c; R7 x3 _& D1 f) vThis ranking, based on hiring experiences of the firms surveyed, assesses the preparedness of recent graduates in a range of vital design skills, as determined by leading firms.
7 \2 i/ q% X/ J
5 ?6 ?& A& K& D* z" jDesign:
* b% V3 Q$ i( V2 }5 [2 c$ o1. Harvard University
# ^$ v ?: l0 H% P2. Kansas State University
( E7 J% n- d$ ]; H- B3. Louisiana State University
9 P7 G3 y! n+ n4 i6 n5 t% B6 D4. Pennsylvania State University. q* J- ^& Y4 b( R3 v& Y+ N" r
5. Ball State University6 f: L: ~* N& i. N0 n
( f9 \' B; s0 J9 RAnalysis and planning:
- f9 @7 g9 u2 u5 ^1. Kansas State University
! |9 A& E" Q$ X- Y+ Q2. Pennsylvania State University+ O" d5 L+ P6 ^5 t5 e, p* a
3. Louisiana State University# `" k8 ^- o" w+ P4 J
University of Georgia
% d f5 ?0 X% X3 A9 ]% V5. Harvard University& l' f8 u& G! M# [, P. T
8 W6 M) C' F: n5 {( y0 yConstruction methods and materials:
5 e ?' X5 z2 V$ ? }1. Kansas State University
! X, y5 m E4 N) ]' O2. University of Georgia
$ p& E! E D7 ]5 R/ W1 e3. Louisiana State University
8 j, L0 [: r( h# Q/ yPennsylvania State University
6 K8 `+ I- d3 S4 U+ r5 E# UPurdue University
, s! A( X1 \ y, l+ ?3 n. w/ m0 f" T8 V+ R4 N
Computer applications:
, b* g( J4 Q" C) @8 O; Q# {1. Harvard University% p" m+ B) v* p+ B$ |4 V% M
2. Pennsylvania State University
7 m1 j: Q4 [: K+ Q' J3. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
' Q9 A" k$ X8 p7 }Purdue University* A& D- L9 q7 O" ^
University of Georgia2 F3 t; E# I4 ]& _+ r$ a! t
) x* g* `# g3 ]8 x# k+ t$ O6 hResearch and theory:
/ J( |2 |5 B' o/ ]9 K4 e1. Harvard University
/ I3 f2 t6 ~& d' ]9 ?2. Pennsylvania State University! ]/ f% v( M: j( ?6 o5 u
3. Kansas State University
1 H) J' m$ U. ]# v# S4 a* @University of Georgia6 V" @7 Z, M: c
5. University of Oregon9 F7 D }2 E+ H6 s* ~) P
University of Virginia) U! ~, `" m$ [' C8 U& _. K
! b+ J# w) c6 L) z7 G' b2 J2 eSecurity design principles:/ Y( X: F8 [5 R5 H: q, m
1. California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo& S: ^- ^2 E% [! `/ x
Kansas State University5 s+ b ^9 Y& m' M1 I
University of Georgia
' a! r7 u; c0 w, J Y4. Ball State University1 q+ F- B% }) l; k- _* D6 |+ w9 T5 C
5. Pennsylvania State University9 [ Q; H( a7 ?4 J6 b: ^9 K1 F5 U: @
0 F7 q- e6 H& c2 w% jSustainable design practices and principles:' ~" {8 e8 ?6 b; @+ q) r6 @5 O2 r
1. University of Georgia
4 ]' \/ a# G/ oUniversity of Oregon& z1 F! C; e* V0 {# h" Y
3. Pennsylvania State University8 v5 M4 O; i" f' q2 T6 K
4. Ball State University
% E7 Y( J) ?% U3 K' j% eCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo' {; N' t% g7 j
Harvard University) E q) j4 o# f) g+ l* j: ~1 {
Kansas State University# E1 a- i& Y" |1 I* N$ b
Michigan State University( l* ~: G6 |/ Y3 @
3 [, j k5 E, g9 ^4 K[ 本帖最后由 melty 于 2008-3-6 11:52 编辑 ] |
-
总评分: 寄托币 + 96
声望 + 4
查看全部投币
|