issue4[Jet小组]第七次作业

yimengshanUID: 2392100

TOPIC: ISSUE4 - "No field of study canadvance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience tothat field of study."
WORDS: 459        TIME: 60min          DATE: 2008-2-16

I fundamentally agree with the author'sassertion that the knowledge and experience of other fields will greatlyaccelerate the development of a certain field. Yet it is also irrational toplace overmuch emphasis on outside knowledge and experience, and all myperspectives will be presented as follows.

First, it is always necessary or even desirablefor some diverse fields to work together for the purpose of advancing a certainstudy's development. A simple example will serve to illustrate this point; knowledgeand experience of different subjects’ background always cooperate in insurance agent: mathematical tools not only workout rate of compensation, but also help to reveal economic fluctuation from aquantitative point; while experience of marketing help to bring company moreprofits. It is their efforts together that enhance the insurance field'sdevelopment. Another example, in the Apollo Project, there were more thaneighty research agent from diverse subjects working together to guarantee theastronauts to land on moon successfully. From above aspects, we can conclude thatdiverse fields' cooperation can serve to promote a certain study or mission' progress.

Second, with assimilating other fields'knowledge means obtaining potential effective tools for a certain field'sresearch, and therefore benefits the development of the field in the long run.In this information era, nearly all subjects are developing rapidly, withapproaching outside field's research fruits, researchers will surely enlargetheir horizons, and perhaps stimulate them to consider questions in a completelynew angle, which could serve to solve their own research problems much moreefficiently. For instance, it is always impossible for a programmer to exploit excellentsoftware with his own effort, yet with the introduction of art-which is used toimprove software’s appearance, their software will be friendlier to accept, andtherefore be more excellent.

In the final analysis, it is alsoinfeasible to overstate the function of other field’s knowledge andexperiences. After all, they will distract researcher's attention on their ownfields. Even in some cases, the theory or practice of other field will severelyaffect the original study's normal research. For example, there is no way tointroduce pseudoscience (like fortune-telling) into mainstream science. Moreover,without mastering fundamental knowledge of original subject, it is difficultfor one to make great contributions to his or her subject just by means ofintroducing into other field’s knowledge.

In conclusion, I fundamentally agree withthe author's conclusion, for other fields' knowledge and experience will notonly provide necessary tools or new thoughts for the original research, butalso enlarge researchers' horizon. Yet, to overemphasis outside knowledge andexperience is also irrational, for it make researchers run the risk of wasting timeand distracting attention. Only when the researchers have mastered enough basicknowledge can they utilize outside knowledge effectively.

sunneptuneUID: 2451588

I fundamentally agree with the author's assertion that the knowledge and experience of other fields will greatly accelerate the development of a certain field. Yet it is also irrational to place over much(感觉搭配有点不对，不是很确定） emphasis on outside knowledge and experience, and all my perspectives will be presented as follows.

First, it is always necessary or even desirable for some diverse fields to work together for the purpose of advancing a certain study's development. A simple example will serve to illustrate this point; knowledge and experience of different subjects’ background always cooperate in insurance agent: mathematical tools not only workout（work out) rate of compensation, but also help to reveal economic fluctuation from a quantitative point; （不应该用分号）while experience of marketing help to bring company more profits. It is their corporate efforts together（去掉，改用corpotate感觉比较好）that enhance the insurance field's development. Another example, in the Apollo Project, there were more than eighty research agents from diverse subjects working together to guarantee  the(去掉）astronauts to land on moon successfully. From above aspects, we can conclude that diverse fields' cooperation can serve to promote a certain study or mission's progress.

Second, with assimilating other fields' knowledge(这不能做主语，with引导的只能做伴随状语） means obtaining potential effective tools for a certain field's research, and therefore benefits the development of the field in the long run.In this information era, nearly all subjects are developing rapidly, with approaching outside field's research fruits, researchers will surely enlarge their horizons, and perhaps stimulate them to consider questions in a completely new angle, which could serve to solve their own research problems much more efficiently.（一个句子中有两个句子成份，改成两句） For instance, it is always impossible for a programmer to exploit excellentsoftware with his own effort. Yet with the introduction of art-which is used to improve software’s appearance, their software will be friendlier(more amity) to accept, and therefore be more excellent.（此句也有两个句子成分，拆为两句）

In the final analysis, it is also infeasible to overstate the function of other field’s(fields') knowledge and experiences. After all, they will distract researcher's attention on(from) their own fields. Even in some cases, the theory or practice of other fields will severely affect the original study's normal research. For example, there is no way to introduce pseudoscience (like fortune-telling) into mainstream science.（感觉例子不恰当，应该举一些正常学科） Moreover,without mastering fundamental knowledge of original subject, it is difficult for one to make great contributions to his or her subject just by means of introducing into other field’s knowledge.

In conclusion, I fundamentally agree with the author's conclusion, for other fields' knowledge and experience will not only provide necessary tools or new thoughts for the original research, but also enlarge researchers' horizon. Yet, to overemphasis outside knowledge and experience is also irrational, for it make researchers run the risk of wasting time and distracting attention. Only when the researchers have mastered enough basic knowledge can they utilize outside knowledge effectively.

小结：注意单词间一定要有空格，事情虽然小，却一点不能大意，否则读起来很麻烦；
          注意单复数形式；
          思路和语言都还不错。