ISSUE87 【Aero小组】第16次作业 by bigyan

bigyanUID: 2382427

in this issue, the speaker asserts that the beginner is more likely that the expert to make important discoveries. I fundamentally agree with the allegation. However, it wrongly suggests that the expert can not play a vital role in making discoveries compared with beginner. So I will analyze the issue as follows.


First and foremost, few would disagree that the expert does well in making discoveries in terms of the abundant experience and comprehensive thought. After all, making discoveries is in need of mastering the marriage of theory and practical need that most beginner is poor in. can you think that a beginner who lack of experience on practical need makes breakthrough? Certainly not. history inform us that the process of discoveries is replete with uncharted and unpredictable territory. No amount of beginner enables to promise to address the pressing problem during the process without any experience, which is proved true in light of previous sum-up. According to experience, the scholar can find certain comparatively easy avenue to attain the accomplishment. Consider the heighten awareness of experience and sum-up, the expert in fact take precedence over the beginner.


Turning to the next, it is tempting to think that all the discoveries can be made by the experienced expert instead of beginner. Yet it is just fact that great innovation and discoveries springs from the mind of beginner insofar as to some extent the innovation stem from the sense of newness and braveness. Notable example comes to my mind immediately. When Bill gate, the founder of Microsoft cooperation, was young at college, he decided to leave school halfway to pursue his interest in computer. In the realm of computer, he must be a beginner; however, he was brave to invent a new operation that can replace the status of DOS because of more convenience. In retrospect, he would not predict his innovation have the impact on the modern American and the whole world. Had he concern himself with the conventional thought rather that brave innovation, we inherently can not see the popularity of the computer.


Finally, that is not to say, however, there is much difference between expert and beginner. It is a compromise that both of them require affording huge effort before making discoveries. Common sense tell me that the process of making discoveries is the way which we human attempt to satisfy our insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselves and the world around us. Only though extensive experience of trials and error can either expert or beginner make discoveries. One apt example of my point involves Edison, laud as the greatest inventor in 20th century. Few would repute that his patents elevate our life to higher standard of living and comfortable level. But more ones notice the significant payment behind his success.


In sum up, whether the beginner or expert can break any ground is up to the determination and endeavor. To shorten the process we should emphasize the importance of the experience. To spur the innovation we should provide beginner with freedom and chance.

newsilencerUID: 2371471

in this issue, the speaker asserts that the beginner is more likely that the expert to make important discoveries. I fundamentally agree with the allegation(allegation指无证据的陈述、论断). However, it wrongly suggests that the expert can not play a vital role in making discoveries compared with beginner. So I will analyze the issue as follows.


First and foremost, few would disagree that the expert does well in making discoveries in terms of the abundant experience and comprehensive thought. After all, making discoveries is in need of mastering(把mastering去掉可能比较通顺) the marriage of theory and practical need that most beginner is poor in. can you think that a beginner who (is) lack of experience on practical need makes breakthrough? Certainly not. history inform(s) us that the process of discoveries is replete with uncharted and unpredictable territory(写得好，记了). No amount of beginner enables to promise to address the pressing problem during the process without any experience, which is proved true in light of previous sum-up. According to experience, the scholar can find certain comparatively easy avenue to attain the accomplishment. Consider the heighten(heightened) awareness of experience and sum-up, the expert in fact take(s) precedence over the beginner.


Turning to the next, it is tempting to think that all the discoveries can be made by the experienced expert instead of beginner. Yet it is just a fact that great innovation(s) and discoveries springs from the mind of beginner insofar as to some extent the innovations stem from the sense of newness and braveness. Notable example comes to my mind immediately. When Bill gate(Gates), the founder of Microsoft Cooperation, was young at college, he decided to leave school halfway to pursue his interest in computer. In the realm of computer, he must be a beginner; however, he was brave to invent a new operation system that can replace the status of DOS because of more convenience(Bill Gates刚成立交通数据公司时发明的是一种BASIC，成立微软后也是先推出MS-DOS，后来才有的Windows 3.0). In retrospect, he would not predict his innovation have the impact on the modern Americans and the whole world. Had he concerned himself with the conventional thought rather that brave innovation, we inherently can not(would not) see the popularity of the computer.


Finally, that is not to say, however, there is much difference between expert and beginner. It is a compromise that both of them require affording huge effort before making discoveries. Common sense tells me that the process of making discoveries is the way which we human attempt to satisfy our insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselves and the world around us(写得好，记了). Only through extensive experience(如果第三段写effort的话，就不要再提experience了) of(acquired from) trials and errors can either expert or(both ...and...) beginner make discoveries. One apt example of my point involves Edison, lauded as the greatest inventor in 20th century. Few would repute that his patents elevated our life to higher standard of living and comfortable level(our life and comfort to a higher standard). But more ones notice the significant payment behind his success.


In(to) sum up, whether the beginner or expert can break any ground is up to the determination and endeavor. To shorten the process we should emphasize the importance of the experience. To spur the innovation we should provide beginner with freedom and chance.

文章组织得很好，第一段写专家因为具有经验和全面的思维因而更可能有重大发现；第二段写新手的创新精神和勇敢对科学发现很重要；第三段总结，写无论是新手还是专家都必须通过努力奋斗来获得成功；最后一段总结。文章的起承转合及连接词值得学习，如First and foremost，Turning to the next...Yet...，Finally, that is not to say, however。
Bill Gates的例子有些不当，因为他是商业人士，而这篇Issue的主题是field of inquiry，属于科学研究。再者Bill Gates只是成立了微软，至于改进DOS，推出Windows的是他本人还是他手下就不得而知了。
欢迎楼主指正我的同主题Issue https://bbs.gter.net/thread-806710-1-1.html