寄托天下
查看: 559|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] Argument111[jet小组]第十八次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
99
注册时间
2008-2-8
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-3-6 16:28:17 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
ARGUMENT111- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc.
"A recent study of Dura-Sock wearers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented "Endure" manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years. Dura-Sock has always advertised its use of the "Endure" process, but the new study shows that the average Dura-Sock customer actually purchases new Dura-Socks every three months. Furthermore, Dura-Sock customers surveyed in our largest market, northeastern United States cities, say that they most value Dura-Sock's stylish appearance and availability in many colors. These findings suggest that Dura-Sock can increase its profits by discontinuing its use of the "Endure" manufacturing process."

word:368

The arguer conclude that the Dura-Sock can increase its profits by discontinuing its use of the 'Endure' manufacturing process. The argument relies on the result of a recent study and a survey. Careful examination of this argument reveals some flaws as followed.

Firstly, the result of the recent study is unreliable as nothing about the study is mentioned about how the study was conducted and how the study can represent the general opinions of the consumers. Even if the study is warranted, we only can get the information that the customer would buy new Dura-Socks per three months averagely. It is not informative to conclude that the socks manufactured by 'Endure' process would be through away per three months, maybe the consumers will wear them until totally worn, that is to say, the time Dura-Socks can lasting are important to the consumers.

Secondly, the survey made in northeastern United States cities is unwarranted to support that all the consumers are agree with the participants in this survey. It can not be eliminated that many people do not send back their ideas to whom the 'Endure' is the primary reason to by Dura-Socks. Even if the survey is success in this aspect, its result is still open to doubt. Because residents lived in different areas may have different interests to a same kind of product due to the circumstance they are lived in and the experiences they have ever went through. So that is to say, the residents lived in other districts may have dissimilar ideas about this topic.

Last but not list, the arguer does not provide informative evidences to justify that Dura-Sock can increase its profits by discontinuing 'Endure' in manufacturing process. The profit of a company are depends by a lot of things, such as the market, the economic, the management. The arguer fails to persuade that the company will increase its profits without enough researches about this company and its socks.

[ 本帖最后由 teewee 于 2008-3-6 16:30 编辑 ]
百倍努力~
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument111[jet小组]第十八次作业 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument111[jet小组]第十八次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-809525-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部