issue4[Savior小组]第四次作业

碎片UID: 2158883

TOPIC: ISSUE4 - "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
Disagree:
1,advance is not equal with innovation
advance means cater for the contemporaries and the trend of development
innovation just stands for breakthroughs in certain field, which should be tested before it can be confirmed as a advance that will contributes to the whole society.
2,it is true that study in any field blended with knowledge and experience of outsiders can bring innovations
3,innovation that have suffered from long-time scientific scrutiny can be regarded to be advancement finally.
4, However, there are still a great amount of innovations turn out to be just tiny stuffs that fill the gaps spread in several studies.
1,发展与创新概念的比较
2，融合其他学科，的确能带来创新
3，创新经过长期的验证，可能成为某科学的飞跃（advancement）
4，但是，大部分创新只是填补了某一学科的空隙。
Study in certain a area combined with knowledge and experience in other fields can result in innovations, but not yet lead to advancements. Hence, I disagree with this absolute

conclusion.

According to the definition of two respective concepts, we can find "advance" and "innovate" are not equally the same. "Advance" means it cater for the contemporaries and the

trend of development, while "innovate" just stands for breakthroughs in some field, which should be tested before it can be confirmed as a advancement that will contributes to the

whole society.

Meanwhile, it is true that study in every area blended with outsiders taking with their theories and practices, can bring innovations. Consider latest adopted methods used in

singing for example, one song is able to mix with classical, folk and fashionable factors such as hip-pop. In this case, the song can be regarded as a adventure, a stimulation

even and an innovation in music. The song is prone to be useless by contrast, for its unemotional expression and unscientific singing. When it comes to any individual field, it

encounters outsiders, giving rise to innovations. Whether these innovations will take good or bad effects, is determined by evaluation of time.

Innovation that have suffered from long-time scientific scrutiny can be regarded to be advancement finally. When Shakespeare brought new ideas into neo-classical principles, he

just was considered to be a brave explorer for writing at that time. Unless and until now, with affirmations for a long time, this new writing has been asserted to be new concept

of writing in the history of literature, and hundreds of thousands of descendants follow it.

However, there are still a great amount of innovations turn out to be just tiny stuffs that fill the gaps spread in several studies. Going deep into one field, the study will

sometimes stay in stagnant situation. The outsiders somewhat pull it out with new view of researching. Though the researchers can find breakthrough successfully, the study should

one the behalf of its original principles. Or else, in most of time, the researches are out of orbit for improper motivation and methods than before.

In sum, every individual field of study can bring innovations when meeting outsiders with their different knowledge and experience. Nevertheless, those innovations fail to be

advancement unless they conform to the rule of development and they are confirmed by scientific scrutiny.   （395字）

很少字，很少例子，欢迎拍砖！

lsyunxUID: 2443450

Study in certain area combined with knowledge and experience in other fields can result in innovations, but not yet lead to advancements. Hence, I disagree with this absolute conclusion.

According to the definition of two respective concepts, we can find "advance" and "innovate" are not equally the same. "Advance" means it cater for the contemporaries and the trend of development(本句表义不明，并且it指的是什么？), while "innovate" just stands for breakthroughs in some field, which should be tested before it can be confirmed as a(an) advancement that will contributes to the whole society.

Meanwhile, it is true that study in every area blended with outsiders(人和研究混合吗？) taking with their theories and practices, can bring innovations. Consider latest adopted methods used in singing for example, one song (应该限定下歌曲类型)is able to mix (be mixed) with classical, folk and fashionable factors(elements) such as hip-pop. In this case, the song can be regarded as a adventure, a stimulation even and(and even) an innovation in music. (However,)The song is prone to (may turn out to) be useless by contrast (a failure), for its unemotional expression and unscientific (discordant) singing. When it comes to any (other) individual field, it encounters outsiders(its knowledge and experience interacts with that of a field outside it),  (thereby) giving rise to innovations. Whether these innovations will take good or bad effects, is determined (和evaluation重复)by evaluation of time.

(Only those )Innovation that have suffered from(一般指经历痛苦、灾难，experienced) long-time(不知道是不是有这个单词？long-term更好) scientific scrutiny can be regarded to be advancement finally(ultimately). （为什么？这里应该加一句原因吧？）When Shakespeare brought new ideas(这个例子不太恰当吧，Shakespeare是结合其它领域的知识而带来的新思想吗？) into neo-classical principles, he just was considered to be a brave explorer for writing at that time. Unless and until now, with affirmations for a long time, this new writing has been asserted to be new concept of writing in the history of literature, and (is followed by)hundreds of thousands of descendants(子孙后代不太合适，writers living after him) follow it(如果改被动，follow it删掉).
However, there are(is) still a great amount of innovations turn out to be just tiny stuffs that fill the gaps spread in several studies. Going deep into one field(With the research going further), the study will sometimes stay in stagnant situation( is often caught and struggling in a stagnant situation). The outsiders somewhat pull it out with new view of researching. Though the researchers can find breakthrough successfully, the study should on the behalf of its original principles.(Although the outsiders could help to the extent that bring to new perspectives the research at hand and the researcher can find breakthrough successfully, the study should obey its original principles.) Or else, in most of time(mostly), the researches are out of orbit for improper motivation and methods than before.
这一段应该是想说，学者应该在接受外来知识时有所选择，不能一味机械融合，不然只是会产生一些不伦不类的成果。

In sum, every individual field of study can bring innovations when meeting outsiders with their different knowledge and experience. Nevertheless, those innovations fail to be advancement unless they conform to the rule of development and they are confirmed by scientific scrutiny。

我觉得整体上有点偏题。题目说的是：没有哪一领域的研究可以取得重大进展除非有其他领域的专家引进他们的知识和经验。即其它领域专家引进他们的经验是取得重大进展的必要条件。论证时可以说不是必要条件，因为有一些领域的重大进步不需要其它领域知识的介入。也可以说，所有领域的进展都要依赖于其它领域知识经验的引入。但你好像写的是，其它领域的引入会导致革新，革新会导致进步，但不是所有的革新都会有进步。那到底是不是所有的领域的重大进展都需要其它领域的知识，并没有提到。
语言还行，没有大的语法错误，不过也没有见太好的句式哦

下边是韦氏词典中advancement 和innovation的解释，你参考下
advancement: 1the action of advancing: the state of being advanced:  a : promotion or elevation to a higher rank or position  b : progression to a higher stage of development
2 : an improved feature  : IMPROVEMENT

Improvement: 1: the act or process of improving   2 a : the state of being improved; especially : enhanced value or excellence        b : an instance of such improvement  : something that enhances value or excellence

Innovation:   1:the introduction of something new
2 : a new idea, method, or device  : NOVELTY

[ 本帖最后由 lsyunx 于 2008-3-8 16:48 编辑 ]