issue43 【文以载道小组2】 7月16

lisheng19881108UID: 2358622

issue 43 " To be a effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standars."                    
字数 440       第一篇望猛拍

When asked about whether a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards, people may find it hard to come to consensus due to their different experiences and conflicting values. The speaker thinks that because they are leaders, thus should set up an example for our general public to follow; while others think that as long as the leader performs well in his position, we can ignore his tiny immoral behaviors. From my perspective, I basically agree with the speaker.

On one hand, officials are required to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards, such as honesty and braveness, thus he can correctly arrange challenge. Our leaders must have these qualities and, in this way, they can bring profits to our country and citizens. For example, Zhou Enlai, the then premier of China, who had the highest ethical and moral standards, did his best to China and brought many profits to Chinese. From this, we know the advantages of the highest ethical and moral standards.

On the other hand, if public official have a bad ethical and moral standards, he will do bad to his country and let their citizens’ credits drop. When two leaders are run an election campaign, the one that have moral behaviors always loose may partly result from his opponent's storming on his moral behavior. The opponent may make the best use of his intelligence to win the election. Otherwise, the immoral scandals may be damages to both the leader himself and the general public. For example, after Nixon's Watergate scandal, a lot of people would not allow another Nixon to get on stage to be their leader and even loose credence on the leaders.  

Moreover, s of the United States, that he had his job well done during his eight years' leadership, the unemployment had fallen to the deepest rate ever since the Great Depression. Certainly, his scandal ruined his public fame in people’s heart, but no one would accused him for his immoral behavior before his great contribution, instead, people still cherish him for his contributions that he hofficials are not moralist and they do not have to make a much higher standard than common people because no one is a perfect man. Bill Clinton, whose love affair still makes him uncomfortable before the media, is still considered to be an effective leader in these peaceful timead done during his time on stage.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that we should call for balance of whether a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.

[ 本帖最后由 lisheng19881108 于 2008-7-16 15:56 编辑 ]

joansUID: 2470688

When asked about whether a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards, people may find it hard to come to consensus due to their different experiences and conflicting values. The speaker thinks that because they are leaders, thus（?they?） should set up an example for our general public to follow;(改成句号) while others think that as long as the leader performs well in his position, we can ignore his tiny immoral behaviors（这句怎么一会是other一会是we啊，到底谁的观点阿。 而且在开头段没必要再引出第三者的看法吧）. From my perspective, I basically agree with the speaker.On （the） one hand, officials are required to maintain the highest ethical and moral standards, such as honesty and braveness, thus he（they） can correctly arrange challenge（why they can arrange challenge just based on honesty and braveness?）. Our leaders must have these qualities and, in this way, they can bring profits to our country and citizens. For example, Zhou Enlai, the then(former) premier of China, who had the highest ethical and moral standards, did his best to China and brought many profits to Chinese (加people). From this, we know the advantages of the highest ethical and moral standards.On the other hand, if public official have a bad ethical and moral standards, he will do bad to his country and let their citizens’ credits drop （lose their credits in the citizen’s hearts）. When two leaders(candidates) are run(run) an election campaign, the one that(who) have moral behaviors (immoral behavior 吧)  always loose may partly result from his opponent's storming on his moral behavior. The opponent may make the best use of his intelligence（the former one’s inferior morality） to win the election. Otherwise, the immoral scandals may be damages to both the leader himself and the general public. For example, after Nixon's Watergate scandal, a lot of people would not allow another Nixon to get on stage to be their leader and even loose credence on the leaders.  Moreover, s(?) of the United States, that he had his job well done during his eight years' leadership, the unemployment had fallen to the deepest rate ever since the Great Depression. Certainly, his scandal ruined his public fame in people’s heart, but no one would accused him for his immoral behavior before his great contribution, instead, people still cherish him for his contributions that he hofficials(?) are not moralist and they do not have to make a much higher standard than common people because no one is a perfect man. Bill Clinton, whose love affair still makes him uncomfortable before the media, is still considered to be an effective leader in these peaceful timead(?) done during his time on stage.In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that we should call for balance of whether a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.

基本的结构是有的，但描述有问题。
如果是刚开始写，可以不用限时，尽量写的充实一些，为以后打基础。语法也错了很多，需要改。
以后把字弄大一些，老了，眼睛不好看不清阿。
加油

lisheng19881108UID: 2358622

哎 里面那些看不懂的地方是我黏贴时出的问题 现在用笔记本写文章，刚开始有点不太适应
很感谢你的建议，我会好好改进的·:)