IMPULSE小组 —— cynthiazhou 教育类 周六

cynthiazhouUID: 2445851

to slove the problems present and future,is it necessary to understand the past?（周六作业）

“We learn from history that we never learn from history.” The first time I heard it, I realized the value of history. Obviously, when someone asked me whether it is necessary to understand the past in order to solve the problems present and future, I replied yes loudly for I believed that one of our best teachers is the history.  

First, things repeat for times. To know the past means to review what would happen now and future; to study the history helps to face the impending affairs. For example, in the long history of China, dynasty changed every decades or centuries. Nevertheless, no matter what dynasty was, the emperor had to copy part of the structure of the former dynasty's regime, follow the tradition of the older and tackle the same public problem such as the flood and the fame issues. If one emperor hoped to change the tradition, he failed most of the time. As a result, knowing the past was extraordinarily important, sometimes even fetal, for the first rank of a country to learn how to conquer his people.

Secondly, since the present and future cannot exist without the past, we could not forbid history or totally desert tradition. If someone asks the question that whether there is a link between future, present and past, what the major of us would answer are definitely positive. However, when the question changes into another type like whether we have to know the past in order to solve questions today and future, I convince that some of us may probably hold the negative opinion. If there is an obvious attachment between past and nowadays, why people refuse to consider the past when we make decisions today? In my opinion, that is because pride and prejudice. Pride makes us to treat old ideas and old thoughts as trash or something out of time; while prejudice leads us to oppose to everything meaningless and worthless. Since we have such pride and prejudice, we forget the past --- our best teacher.

As a law student, I know that the history is part of today’s law for common law. One basic rule of this type of legal system is stare decisis. Without the abundance of cases and verdicts, no common law subsists.

[ 本帖最后由 cynthiazhou 于 2008-7-26 12:31 编辑 ]

迷茫者UID: 2514662

IMPULSE小组 —— cynthiazhou 教育类 周六

to slove the problems present and future,is it necessary to understand the past?（周六作业）留学,考试,TOEFL,GRE,GMAT,IELTS,SAT,VISA,文书,签证,论坛,出国,申请,美国,英国,欧洲,加拿大,USA9J)aU0r;REo        D
0uQ
Zk1E_g1Z
“We learn from history that we never learn from history.” The first time I heard it, I realized the value of history.(名言讲的是" 我们从史实中认识到，我们从未以历史为鉴",说的是人类的通病,无法看出历史的价值,有点牵强,建议少用或者不用名言)Obviously, when someone asked(asks) me whether it is necessary to understand the past in order to solve the problems present and future, I replied(will reply) yes loudly for I believed that one of our best teachers is the history.  )O8jzJQ
CS

First, things repeat for times(更地道的说法是:histry is always copying itself). To know the past means to review what would happen now and future; to study the history helps to face the impending affairs. For example, in the long history of China, dynasty changed every decades or centuries. Nevertheless, no matter what dynasty was(no matter which dynasty it was), the emperor had to copy part of the structure of the former dynasty's regime, follow the tradition of the older(order tradition) and tackle the same public(social) problem(s) such as the flood and the fame issues. If one emperor hoped(hope) to change the tradition, he failed most of the time(he or she will fail over and over). As a result, knowing the past was(is) extraordinarily important, sometimes even fetal(or even fatal), for the first rank of a country to learn how to conquer his people.(病句) ;B8zZ~D
DrO
Secondly, since the present and future cannot exist without the past, we could not forbid history or totally desert tradition. If someone asks the question that whether there is a link between future, present and past(whether there si a link among future ,present and past), what the major of us would(will) answer are definitely positive. However, when the question changes into another type like whether we have to know the past in order to solve (the)questions today and future, I convince that some of us may probably(delete one of them)hold the negative opinion. If there is an obvious attachment between past and nowadays, why do people refuse to consider the past when we make decisions today? In my opinion, that is because (of) pride and prejudice. Pride makes us to treat old ideas and old(delete it) thoughts as trash or something out of time; while prejudice leads us to oppose to everything meaningless and worthless. Since we have such pride and prejudice, we forget the past --- our best teacher. bbs.gter.net-Yc&~#]r \"EBx%C
As a law student, I know that the history is part of today’s law for common law(confusing). One basic rule of this type of legal system is stare decisis. Without the abundance of(delete it) cases and verdicts, no common law subsists.
1.注意基本语法 如: if ..does,...will...  among 和 between的区别   注意病局
2.注意时态  发表自己观点时 最好用一般现在时
3.内容上有待进一步提高~~~结构上不错
继续努力

19811010316UID: 2220703

“We learn from history that we never learn from history.” (戴云弟子？这个名言意思好像说我们并没有从历史中学到什么。) The first time I heard it, I realized the value of history. Obviously, when someone asked me whether it is necessary to understand the past in order to solve the problems present and future, I replied yes loudly for I believed that one of our best teachers is the history.  
Vx        t+oG3}T/Wa

First, things repeat for times. To know the past means to review what would happen now and future; to study the history helps to face the impending affairs. For example, in the long history of China, dynasty changed every decades or centuries（？）. Nevertheless, no matter what dynasty was, the emperor had to copy part of the structure of the former dynasty's regime, follow the tradition of the older and tackle the same public problem such as the flood and the fame issues. If one emperor hoped to change the tradition, he failed most of the time. As a result, knowing the past was extraordinarily important, sometimes even fetal, for the first rank of a country(解释一下，不太懂) to learn how to conquer his people. |留学|签证|TOEFL|GRE2K7{ZO c+W
历史的例子很好。

Secondly, since the present and future cannot exist without the past, we could not forbid（forget/neglect） history or totally desert tradition. If someone asks the question that whether there is a link between future, present and past, what the major of us would answer are definitely positive. However, when the question changes into another type like whether we have to know the past in order to solve questions today and future, I convince that some of us may probably hold the negative opinion. If there is an obvious attachment between past and nowadays, why people refuse to consider the past when we make decisions today? In my opinion, that is because pride and prejudice. Pride makes us to treat old ideas and old thoughts as trash or something out of time; while prejudice leads us to oppose to everything meaningless and worthless. Since we have such pride and prejudice, we forget the past --- our best teacher.

As a law student, I know that the history is part of today’s law for common law(楼主解释). One basic rule of this type of legal system is stare decisis. Without the abundance of cases and verdicts, no common law subsists（专业阿）

rebeccavenUID: 2140456

结尾的方式有点奇特, 结尾和前面都没有关系. 似乎是用自己的专业又讲了一遍主题. 比较新奇.
第一句名言,可否解释下?

cynthiazhouUID: 2445851

谢谢这么认真的批改~:loveliness:

第一次参加活动，没来得及好好检查就发帖了~

语法很差，写的东西自己都觉得不能看，sigh

内容上我总觉得没什么可说的，所以宁愿写综合写作的说~

再次感谢~

cynthiazhouUID: 2445851

大家都对第一个句子有疑惑，我就解释下了拉。
其实我觉得，既然人类从来都没有学会从历史中学到什么，那么就是说大家都忽视了历史。我认为历史重要，就是说过去很重要，之所以重要是因为对今天和明天的事情会起到作用。可能关系不时很明确吧，呵呵~

那个什么first rank的，估计病句，当时想说的是最高层次的人群，哈哈~

普通法系（common law）的一个特点就是遵循先例（stare decisis），就是查以前类似案件的所有资料，就是历史拉，所以我说历史是普通法系最重要的组成~

cynthiazhouUID: 2445851

说道结尾，我从来没结尾的，不是个好习惯。
而且字数我一向写不多，所以差不多了我就不写了，汗~

第一句就是说，我们从历史中学到的是我们从来没吸取历史教训。