寄托天下
查看: 1308|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] issue11 [7\8\9\10]第18次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
313
注册时间
2008-4-17
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2008-8-9 17:38:33 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE11 - "All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
WORDS:          TIME:        DATE: 2008-8-8 11:44:22

The speaker claims that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. I tend to agree with this claim. However, it contains certain risks that all participating nations must be careful to minimize.

With the development of transportation and telecommunications, we live in a global village. More and more problems are needed to be dismissed by the efforts of people all around the world. Such as the worldwide reject of nuclear weapons, even if few countries are developing nuclear weapons, we are glad to see North Korea' compromise to keep the peace of our world. It owns to the efforts of many nations, such as America, China, North Korea and so on.

Or consider the environment problems such as the global warming of environment. Since solving this issue requires the awareness of all the nations, we have get together to think out an approach to this urgent issue which has threatened our lives and animals. Fortunately, nations have make efforts to give us a better environment. The fact that more and more agreements are signed by many nations to improve global warming has demonstrated nations' determinations to solve this problem: global warming.

Moreover, nations are depending on others more closely than ever. When the stock of America declines, we can see so many countries' stocks decline as well. Furthermore, when the price of raw oil increases significantly, the price of raw oil of a lot of nations also increase at once. And the anti-criticism needs all of nations to make a contribution.

However, even if obvious benefits are so appealing, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize. Common sense tells us that a nation would like to solve its social problems firstly. Even if that it is not the case, we can also forecast that different cultures have different definitions of the most urgent social problem due to their different backgrounds, it is likely to emerge disagreements. Even assuming this would not happen, we may find that different cultures also have different approaches to solve a social problem. Thus, different problems have to be solved in terms of different culture backgrounds they are in.

In conclusion, since benefits overweigh the shortcomings. I agree with the speaker's claim that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. However, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize.   


回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
358
注册时间
2008-1-30
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2008-8-10 21:59:21 |只看该作者
The speaker claims that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems.(有点过于重复题目,句式可以变换一下)
I tend to agree with this claim. However, it contains certain risks that all participating nations must be careful to minimize.

With the development of transportation and telecommunications, we live in a global village. More and more problems are needed to be dismissed by the efforts of people all around the world. Such as the worldwide reject(rejection) of nuclear weapons, even if few countries are developing nuclear weapons, we are glad to see North Korea' compromise to keep the peace of our world. It owns to the efforts of many nations, such as America, China, North Korea and so on.


Or consider the environment problems such as the global warming of environment. Since solving this issue requires the awareness of all the nations, we have (to)get together to think out an approach to this urgent issue which has threatened our lives and animals. Fortunately, nations have make efforts to give us a better environment. The fact that more and more agreements are signed by many nations to improve global warming has demonstrated nations' determinations to solve this problem: global warming.

Moreover, nations are depending on others more closely than ever. (我认为这段的主题不是不是相互依靠而是影响:nations are influencing each other more deeply than ever)
When the stock of America declines, we can see so many countries' stocks decline as well. Furthermore, when the price of raw oil increases significantly, the price of raw oil of a lot of nations also increase at once. And the anti-criticism needs all of nations to make a contribution.(这句话和主题无关啊,你是想说,犯罪的国际化使得国家之间要联合起来进行打击吗?International crimes have committed crimes not only in one country but all over the world, therefore the anti-criticism needs all nations to make contributions.)

However, even if obvious benefits are so appealing, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize. Common sense tells us that a nation would like to solve its social problems firstly. Even if that it is not the case, we can also forecast that different cultures have different definitions of the most urgent social problem due to their different backgrounds, it is likely to emerge disagreements. Even assuming this would not happen, we may find that different cultures also have different approaches to solve a social problem. Thus, different problems have to be solved in terms of different culture backgrounds they are in. (这段没看懂,到底risk 是什么呢?你没有讲清楚,是容易造成误解导致战争还是耽误各个国家解决各自的问题)

In conclusion, since benefits overweigh the shortcomings. I agree with the speaker's claim that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. However, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize.  

总体来说,文章的大致思路是有的,也没有离开总的论述
但是文章语言稍微欠缺,例子的表达还需加强

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
34
寄托币
1893
注册时间
2005-4-1
精华
0
帖子
60
板凳
发表于 2008-8-12 19:54:48 |只看该作者
谈点个人拙见

文章主旨在于同意命题的观点,即支持建GU。那么后文主要笔墨应用于为什么要建GU,有什么好处。
全文大多数提到的是我们所现在所面临的问题。可是,可GU有什么关系呢?
每段分析文字和GU的联系实在太少,应该要在这方面加工。这样字数也会多一些。


The speaker claims that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. I tend to agree with this claim. However, it contains certain risks that all participating nations must be careful to minimize.

With the development of transportation and telecommunications, we live in a global village. More and more problems are needed to be dismissed by the efforts of people all around the world. Such as the worldwide reject of nuclear weapons,(这里应该断成两句了) even if few countries are developing nuclear weapons, we are glad to see North Korea' compromise to keep the peace of our world. It owns to the efforts of many nations, such as America, China, North Korea and so on.


Or consider the environment problems such as the global warming of environment. Since solving this issue requires the awareness of all the nations, we have get together to think out an approach to this urgent issue which has threatened our lives and animals. Fortunately, nations have make efforts to give us a better environment. The fact that more and more agreements are signed by many nations to improve global warming has demonstrated nations' determinations to solve this problem: global warming.

Moreover, nations are depending on others more (interdependent)closely than ever. When the stock (index)of America declines, we can see so many countries' stocks decline as well. Furthermore, when the price of raw oil increases significantly, the price of raw oil (petroleum)of a lot of nations also increase at once. And the anti-criticism needs all of nations to make a contribution.

However, even if obvious benefits are so appealing, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize. Common sense tells us that a nation would like to solve its social problems firstly. Even if that it is not the case, we can also forecast that different cultures have different definitions of the most urgent social problem due to their different backgrounds, it is likely to emerge disagreements. Even assuming this would not happen, we may find that different cultures also have different approaches to solve a social problem. Thus, different problems have to be solved in terms of different culture backgrounds they are in.

In conclusion, since benefits overweigh the shortcomings. I agree with the speaker's claim that all nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems. However, there are certain risks the nations that all participating nations must strike to minimize.   

使用道具 举报

RE: issue11 [7\8\9\10]第18次作业 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
issue11 [7\8\9\10]第18次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-867634-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部