COMEON-----作文小组 qawsed 8.25作业

qawsedUID: 2359935

题目翻译 More and more things are needed to do, which resulted that people can do nothing well.不知道对不对哦

Some people argue that when more things are needed to do, they feel frustrated and can not work out. For the opposite side, others believe that doing well or bad does not solely depends on more or less things to confront. In my point of view, I agree with the latter one. There are many reasons to support that.

To begin with, quantity and quality do not related in direct ratio, whether you can do things well depends on the way you choose. Quantity could not thoroughly influence the result of quality. If you have more business to handle, it is wise for you to solve them systematically. Firstly, you can distinguish them in certain way. For example, in terms of the importance, emergent event comes first while normal stuff follows. Secondly, using the most efficient method to figure out them is more desirable. In modern society, efficiency can quality equal with each other closely. Imagine that a car factory should arise its speed to produce more products in order to satisfy the mass needs. Under this condition, not only the quality but also the quantity would determines the credit standing and living ability of company. The first problem they have to consider is how to make more cars and also insure each car's quality. This stimulates the manager and the the specialists to promote technology to boost the efficiency as well as the productivity. In order to survive in the competitive market, this company does not fail due to more growing amount of products.

Furthermore, giving the same mission to different people, you'll find that the result changes. Different people have different educational background and practical abilities. It is not surprise to see one person handling all the impossible countless missions effectively and efficiently. With his smartness and diligence, he seems always patient to confront each stuff and dispose them successfully. However, I have a friend who is very laze and careless. he never shows the enthusiasm toward his work and even mix many various things together, which induce the essential failure as if he were allowed to have enough time to treat with them. Moreover, sometimes getting help from friends and colleagues would contribute a lot during the busy time. People who have kind heart and open character owe the priority. As a result, people behave diversely when they face problems and cooperate with others. Whether they can finish the accelerated things, it depends.

From what discussed above, I firmly believe that although things become more than before, to accomplish all of them well or do nothing favorably does not totally lie on the quantity.

tclrjtclrjUID: 2517750

Some people argue that when more things are needed to do, they feel frustrated and can not work out. For the opposite side, others believe that doing well or bad does not solely depends on more or less things to confront. In my point of view, I agree with the latter one. There are many reasons to support that.

To begin with, quantity and quality do not related in direct ratio, whether you can do things well depends on the way you choose. Quantity could not thoroughly influence the result of quality. If you have more business to handle, it is wise for you to solve them systematically. Firstly, you can distinguish them in certain way. For example, in terms of the importance, emergent event comes first while normal stuff follows. Secondly, using the most efficient method to figure out them is more desirable(这应该是desired吧）. In modern society, efficiency can quality equal with each other closely这句没大看懂. Imagine that a car factory should arise its speed to produce more products in order to satisfy the mass needs. Under this condition, not only the quality but also the quantity would determines the credit standing and living ability of company. The first problem they have to consider is how to make more cars and also insure each car's quality. This stimulates the manager and the the specialists to promote technology to boost the efficiency as well as the productivity. In order to survive in the competitive market, this company does not fail due to more growing(这两个词都当增加的意思讲吧） amount of products.

Furthermore, giving the same mission to different people, you'll find that the result changes. Different people have different educational background and practical abilities. It is not surprise to see one person handling all the impossible countless missions effectively and efficiently. With his smartness and diligence, he seems always patient to confront each stuff and dispose them successfully. However, I have a friend who is very laze lazy and careless. he never shows the enthusiasm toward his work and even mix many various things together, which induce the essential failure as if he were ( was not)allowed to have enough time to treat with（去掉） them. Moreover, sometimes getting help from friends and colleagues would contribute a lot during the busy time. People who have kind heart(kind-hearted) and open character owe the priority. As a result, people behave diversely when they face problems and cooperate with others. Whether they can finish the accelerated things, it depends.

From what discussed above, I firmly believe that although things become more than before, to accomplish all of them well or do nothing favorably does not totally lie on the quantity.

小改一点，时间有点紧张不能仔细看鸟

devilkinelevenUID: 2442869

Some people argue that when more things are needed to do, they feel frustrated and can not work out. For the opposite side, others believe that doing well or bad does not solely depends on more or less things to confront. In my point of view, I agree with the latter one. There are many reasons to support that.

To begin with, quantity and quality do （are） not related in direct ratio, whether you can do things well depends on the way you choose. Quantity could not thoroughly influence the result of quality. If you have more business to handle, it is wise for you to solve them systematically. Firstly, you can distinguish them in certain way. For example, in terms of the importance, emergent event comes first while normal (是不是ordinary更好些？我也不太确定) stuff follows. Secondly, using the most efficient method to figure out them is more desirable. In modern society, efficiency can quality equal with each other closely. Imagine that a car factory should arise （raise） its speed to produce more products in order to satisfy the mass needs. Under this condition, not only the quality but also the quantity would determines the credit standing and living ability of company. The first problem they have to consider is how to make more cars and also insure each car's quality. （两个问题要考虑，和the first problem矛盾了）This stimulates the manager and the the specialists to promote technology to boost the efficiency as well as the productivity. In order to survive in the competitive market, this company does not fail due to more growing amount of products.

Furthermore, giving the same mission to different people, you'll find that the result changes. Different people have different educational background and practical abilities. It is not surprise （surprising） to see one person handling all the impossible countless missions effectively and efficiently. With his smartness and diligence, he seems always patient to confront(face?)each stuff and dispose (handle) them successfully. However, I have a friend who is very laze and careless. he never shows the enthusiasm toward his work and even mix many various things together, which induce the essential failure as if he were allowed to have enough time to treat with（with可以去掉） them. Moreover, sometimes getting help from friends and colleagues would contribute a lot during the busy time. People who have kind heart and open character owe the priority. As a result, people behave diversely when they face problems and cooperate with others. Whether they can finish the accelerated things, it depends.（同样的工作有些人做得好，有些人做不好，通过这个比较，论证需要处理事件的多少与最终得到效果不构成因果关系。建议楼主再多写两句，把这个关系再明确下，毕竟老外的脑子大多比我们直。）

From what discussed above, I firmly believe that although things become more than before, to accomplish all of them well or do nothing favorably does not totally lie on the quantity.

qiaoxsh07UID: 2374361

Some people argue that when more things are needed to do, they feel frustrated and can not work out. For the opposite side, others believe that doing well or bad does not solely depends(depend) on more or less things to confront. In my point of view, I agree with the latter one. There are many reasons to support that.

To begin with, quantity and quality do not related in direct ratio,(感觉有点别扭，这样改怎么样：quantity and quality do not have direct relationship in ratio/quantity are not in proportion to quanlity) whether you can do things well depends(depend) on the way you choose. Quantity could not thoroughly (这个副词用的好，积攒下)influence the result of quality. If you have more business to handle, it is wise for you to solve them systematically. Firstly, you can distinguish them in certain way. For example, in terms of the importance, emergent event comes first while normal stuff follows. Secondly, using the most efficient method to figure out them （figure them out 记得如果是个名词可以figure out things 或者figure things out ,代词只能放中间）is more desirable. In modern society, efficiency can quality equal with each other closely. Imagine that a car factory should arise(increase) its speed to produce more products in order to satisfy the mass needs. Under this condition, not only the quality but also the quantity would determines the credit standing and living ability of company. The first problem they have to consider is how to make more cars and also insure each car's quality. This stimulates the manager and the the specialists to promote technology to boost the efficiency as well as the productivity. In order to survive in the competitive market, this company does not fail due to more growing amount of products.

(第一点理由想的很好，但例子只能说明革新技术能提高产量，希望最后在加一句说明没牺牲质量，或者汽车性能也提高了，这样才能扣题---也就是你的第一点理由的中心句)

Furthermore, giving the same mission to different people, you'll find that the result changes. Different people have different educational background and practical abilities. It is not surprise to see one person handling all the impossible countless missions effectively and efficiently. With his smartness and diligence, he seems always patient to confront each stuff and dispose them successfully. However, I have a friend who is very laze and careless. he never shows the（the 去掉，读起来更流畅） enthusiasm toward his work and even mix many various things together, which induce the essential failure as(even,呵呵笔误吧) if he were allowed to have enough time to treat with them. Moreover, sometimes getting help from friends and colleagues would contribute a lot during the busy time. People who have kind heart and open character owe the priority. As a result, people behave diversely when they face problems and cooperate with others. Whether they can finish the accelerated things, it depends.

(这一点理由思路很清楚，给个小建议：希望这段开头句就能提出一个能明确支持中心论点的论据，比如有些有能力的人即使面对很多任务也能做的很好，然后展开)

From what discussed above, I firmly believe that although things become more than before, to accomplish all of them well or do nothing favorably does not totally lie on the quantity.

总体来讲文章写的逻辑挺清楚的，有很多句子表达的很精准，我写的那篇文章用好几句表达的，你能用一句概括，佩服，比如第二段：in terms of the importance, emergent event comes first while normal stuff follows。

向楼主学习，共同进步，下面是我的作文，交迟了，还没人给改，希望楼主能给拍下，谢谢

https://bbs.gter.net/thread-872858-1-1.html