【0906G ANap Hand 作文互改小组】第一次Issue作业 by brokenwingssss

brokenwingssssUID: 2484462

不知怎么滴，一点感觉都没有，写了不到300字，实在受不了了，貌似当初写T作文的时候不写到400收不住手，可能好就没写了，开始写的时候还翻出来以前T的习作才稍微知道怎么动笔， 虽然也是第一次写Issue ，但跟好多人比起来差好多啊，我会尽量加油的，就凑合着 看看吧。

Currently, the issue of whether government should never censor the artistic works or historical displays has been brought to public attention. Concerning this question, people's opinion
differ . As far as I am concerned, we should take a deeper insight whether the censor is or is not necessary.

Admittedly, some artistic works or displays might involve something not so appropriate for the public that it is the government’s duty to discover them and expunge them, at least to the extant that the exhibitors should be accepted by the majority of the audiences in a right and decent way. For example, artistic works or displays related to racial prejudice, such as those pictures or movies which advocate the fascism, should not be exhibited to the public. Those things may distort people' believes and values.

However, as the main supervisor of a nation, government should not misuse the censorship to control the exhibitions, they should be monitored by the public. In Japan, we could not find any exhibitions about the Nanjing Massacre until recently, the Japanese government still do not admit their monstrous crimes in the world war two. This is a action which is lack of responsibility. It is not a wise act that a government should do so that they Japanese people still do not get forgiveness from those countries they had invaded.

To sum up, government should stand at a high level and deal with the things in different dimensions. What we need is a powerful but not autocratic government, a democratic but a unrestrained government. Therefore, I assert that government should, to some extent, censor the artistic works or historical displays that a museum wishes to exhibit.

roinyouUID: 2447501

文章句法和结构都比较明确，句子表达也具有一定变化。
文章表达正反两个方面，表达应该适当censor的观点。在反对观点的第三段，文章第一句主题句说政府不应该不正当censor和应当受公众监督，例子中我们可以明白作者想要说日本不正当censor的例子，但是和主题的相关性的develop还是不够充分些，结尾总结观点也是说政府应该怎样处事，有点广了，详细一些就好了！最后字数有点少，可以展开更详尽一点！
Issue的确让我们看到了它的难度，让我们一起加油吧，共同努力加油吧！！！
祝你好运！！

Currently, the issue of whether government should never censor the artistic works or historical displays has been brought to public attention. Concerning this question, people's opinion
differ . As far as I am concerned, we should take a deeper insight whether the censor is or is not necessary.

Admittedly, some artistic works or displays might involve something not so appropriate for the public that it is the government’s duty to discover them and expunge them, at least to the extant that the exhibitors should be accepted by the majority of the audiences in a right and decent way. For example, artistic works or displays related to racial prejudice, such as those pictures or movies which advocate the fascism, should not be exhibited to the public. Those things may distort people' believes and values.

However, as the main supervisor of a nation, government should not misuse the censorship to control the exhibitions, and they should be monitored by the public. In Japan, we could not find any exhibitions about the Nanjing Massacre until recently, the Japanese government still do not admit their monstrous crimes in the world war two/World War II. This is a action which is lack of responsibility. It is not a wise act that a government should do so that they Japanese people still do not get forgiveness from those countries they had invaded.

To sum up, government should stand at a high level and deal with the things in different dimensions. What we need is a powerful but not autocratic government, a democratic but a unrestrained government. Therefore, I assert that government should, to some extent, censor the artistic works or historical displays that a museum wishes to exhibit.