The following appeared in a memo from the chief operating officer of the Presto Manufacturing Company.
"Since orders for our major product increased by over 200 percent last quarter, we should promptly expand production by building a new manufacturing plant in Summit City. Summit City is the ideal location for the new plant because it has low property taxes, extensive blocks of land available for immediate purchase, and a large number of residents who are not currently employed."
1. 1.订单增加不能推得需要新建厂房。(1)不能肯定以后的订单依然很多;(2)新建厂房的成本如何
2. 2.厂房不一定要建在Summit City (1)low property tax不能说明没有其他tax (2)地价问题,交通运输问题 (3)许多人待业不能说明他们会去该公司
In this argument, the author quotes that the order for the major product in his company increased by 200 last quarter. Therefore, he recommends to build a new manufacturing plant in Summit City which he assumes to have great advantages. But after cautious reading I find some logical flaws in his argument.
First of all, the author unfairly assumes that order for the product in the following quarters will increase or remain a big amount. It is strongly possible that people need the product only in certain period of time in a year. Even though the order will remain increasing, it is not considerate to build a new plant. Perhaps the profit of one product is very little and the investment of a new plant may be a huge amount of money. And the risk of losing money should also be taken into account.
Secondly, the author fails to give any convincing reasons to support his recommendation about building a new plant in Summit City. The fact that the city has low property tax is not sufficient. Perhaps there are several other kinds of taxes which are high. And also the author fails to provide the condition of those blocks of land which are available for immediate purchase. It is entirely possible that those blocks of land are of high price, or perhaps they are in a remote area that is far away from the urban. Even assuming that the blocks of land are at good position and of reasonable price, it remains doubtful whether they are suitable for a manufacturing plant.
Finally, the author unfairly assumes that the unemployed residents will work for his company. Maybe the residents who are not employed yet are mainly students who have to stay at school for several years. Even if these residents are legally suitable for work and eager to find a job, it is possible that they will find jobs in other companies. After all, if a company cannot make profits and even lose money, few people will be interested in it.
In sum, the author’s argument that the company should build a new manufacturing plant in Summit City is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument the author must provide evidences that order for the major product will remain a big amount, and Summit City is totally a good place for building a manufacturing plant at a satisfying price. To better evaluate the argument I would also need to know the actual unemployed situation in this city, and their intention in choosing a job.
The following appeared in a memo from the chief operating officer of the Presto Manufacturing Company.
"Since orders for our major product increased by over 200 percent last quarter, we should promptly expand production by building a new manufacturing plant in Summit City. Summit City is the ideal location for the new plant because it has low property taxes, extensive blocks of land available for immediate purchase, and a large number of residents who are not currently employed."
1. 1.订单增加不能推得需要新建厂房。(1)不能肯定以后的订单依然很多;(2)新建厂房的成本如何
2. 2.厂房不一定要建在Summit City (1)low property tax不能说明没有其他tax (2)地价问题,交通运输问题 (3)许多人待业不能说明他们会去该公司
In this argument, the author quotes that the order for the major product in his company increased by 200 last quarter. Therefore, he recommends to build a new manufacturing plant in Summit City which he assumes to have great advantages. But after cautious reading I find some logical flaws in his argument.
First of all, the author unfairly assumes that order for the product in the following quarters will increase or remain a big amount. It is strongly strong possible that people need the product only in certain period of time in a year. Even though the order will remain increasing, it is not considerate to build a new plant. Perhaps the profit of one product is very little and the investment of a new plant may be a huge amount of money. And the risk of losing money should also be taken into account.
Secondly, the author fails to give any convincing reasons to support his recommendation about building a new plant in Summit City. The fact that the city has low property tax is not sufficient. Perhaps there are several other kinds of taxes which are high. 这里可以举几个具体点的税种 然后把税钱加起来做个比较 And also the author fails to provide the condition of those blocks of land which are available for immediate purchase. It is entirely possible that those blocks of land are of high price, or perhaps they are in a remote area that is far away from the urban. Even assuming that the blocks of land are at good position and of reasonable price, it remains doubtful whether they are suitable for a manufacturing plant. 这一段前面都写得很好,最后这一句话 是不是还要写上原因呢
Finally, the author unfairly assumes that the unemployed residents will work for his company. Maybe the residents who are not employed yet are mainly students who have to stay at school for several years. Even if these residents are legally suitable for work and eager to find a job, it is possible that they will find jobs in other companies. After all, if a company cannot make profits and even lose money, few people will be interested in it.这一段的原因找的不太好 呵呵 感觉在抬杠
In sum, the author’s建议你删掉 有凑字数的嫌疑哦 argument that the company should build a new manufacturing plant in Summit City is unconvincing. To strengthen the argument, the author must provide evidences that order for the major product will remain a big amount, and Summit City is totally a good place for building a manufacturing plant at a satisfying price. To better evaluate the argument I would also need to know the actual unemployed situation in this city, and their intention in choosing a job.