- 最后登录
- 2010-9-4
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 148
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-12
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 75
- UID
- 2571208

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 148
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Issue180【0906G 文以载道三月四月作文小组】2.2作业 on noheven
180. Many problems ofmodern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system because moralbehavior cannot be legislated.
现代社会的许多问题是法律和立法系统所不能解决的,因为道德行为无法靠立法来规范。
1.
诚然现代社会的许多问题不是法律和立法系统所能解决的,但它们并不全部来自道德问题。
2.
就法律是否可以规范道德问题,有两个层次:
2-1首先,法律源自人类的一些基本道德准则和规范,例如不可杀人越货等,因此道德行为至少在一定程度上是可以用法律规范的,主要体现在对主流价值和大众利益的维护;
2-2其次,对个人道德行为,法律难以精细地规定;否则,个人的自由意志和权利就难以保障。
3.因此要解决现代社会问题,并非仅仅依靠法律和立法;更需要平衡各种社会要素,同时倡导一种合适的价值和道德观念。
WORDS:519
It seems that there are always so many problems in modern society waiting to be solved. Can they be solved by legislating the moral behavior? This assertion assumes that modern social problems mostly come from moral issues; however, in fact, it is not the truth. When discussing how to solve modern social problems, what is need is to research how they were born first then the ways to solve them. In addition, moral behavior still plays a significant part among them.(个人感觉这一段好像没有把自己的观点有力地表现出来)
First, in the respect of the origins of modern social problems, moral is not the only or the main factor all the time – even in some old school thinking, it was. Any modern social problem relates to various of (这个有语法错误,a variety of)factors, which are influenced by each other at the same time, such as education problem, gender inequality, and health care delivery. Just discussing the education problem, since it is the result of several different factors including funding, teacher quality, standard testing, racial imbalances and curriculum in relation to the labor force need and global competition; how can it be solved by legislating the moral behavior? Of course, government makes some laws and instructions to make sure that children get elementary education, but it has less busyness about moral but more about the development. (这段论点句表述不够明确,论据说服力不够)
Second, in the respect of the influence from morals to laws and the legal system, there are two levels. On one hand, laws and the legal system base on the foundation of morals and values of the majority in one society, so some moral behavior can be legislated bylaws and legal system, at least. For instance, stolen and murdering is object to the moral standard of majority and hand they are quite a type of crime. And laws prescribe that parents should raise their children while “ngo”s have the rights to free of taxes. In this level, laws and legal system can protect the main values and keep one society in balance and some kind of health by laws and legal system based on moral standard.
On the other hand, quit a lot of personal behavior is difficult to define by laws and legal system, even they having the tags of “moral” or “immoral”; otherwise, there is no “free will” or “human rights”. If a husband betrays his wife while she still in love with him – in some people’s eyes, of course it is immoral; - however, the husband does not transgress the law. If government legislated the loyalty of love, then it means that one will never have other chance to choose again even the former choice is not suitable. Dose it work? Never. Meanwhile, different people hold the different views of what is right and what is wrong in details, while the members of the same society have the similar values and moral standard. (可能前面两段逻辑有点混乱,我觉得应该把赞成题目观点的论调放在一起,把反对论调放在一起,而不是正反正反,这样就太乱了)
In general speaking, the ways to solve modern social problems not only depend on legislating the moral behavior but also depend on balancing various of social factors. Personal issue and public duty having something to do with the social issues can be encouraged or not, but cannot be legislated. |
|