寄托天下
查看: 1451|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 请教一道阅读题 97 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
181
注册时间
2008-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-5-29 11:53:16 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
97.10国内题" r, ~- x" Q" K4 }9 Q
3 g5 n4 Q. W! g, z! M! c6 z) \
Investigators of monkeys’ social behavior have always been struck by monkeys’ aggressive potential and the consequent need for social control of their aggressive behavior. Studies directed at describing aggressive behavior and the situations that elicit it, as well as the social mechanisms that control it, were therefore among the first investigations of monkeys’ social behavior.* k8 d; C! {; `6 e7 ^
3 w9 j7 M/ G) n3 A/ E
Investigators initially believed that monkeys would compete for any resource in the environment: hungry monkeys would fight over food, thirsty monkeys would fight over water, and, in general, any time more than one monkey in a group sought the same incentive simultaneously, a dispute would result and would be resolved through some form of aggression. However, the motivating force of competition for incentives began to be doubted when experiments like Southwick’s on the reduction of space or the withholding of food failed to produce more than temporary increases in intragroup aggression. Indeed, food deprivation not only failed to increase aggression but in some cases actually resulted in decreased frequencies of aggression." _, @  S. G/ }( s- j0 F" f; n4 U

Studies of animals in the wild under conditions of extreme food deprivation likewise revealed that starving monkeys devoted almost all available energy to foraging, with little energy remaining for aggressive interaction. Furthermore, accumulating evidence from later studies of a variety of primate groups, for example, the study conducted by Bernstein, indicates that one of the most potent stimuli for eliciting aggression is the introduction of an intruder into an organized group. Such introductions result in far more serious aggression than that produced in any other types of experiments contrived to produce competition.

These studies of intruders suggest that adult members of the same species introduced to one another for the first time show considerable hostility because, in the absence of a social order, one must be established to control interanimal relationships. When a single new animal is introduced into an existing social organization, the newcomer meets even more serious aggression. Whereas in the first case aggression establishes a social order, in the second case resident animals mob the intruder, thereby initially excluding the new animal from the existing social unit. The simultaneous introduction of several animals lessens the effect, if only because the group divides its attention among the multiple targets. If, however, the several animals introduced to a group constitute their own social unit, each group may fight the opposing group as a unit; but, again, no individual is subjected to mass attack, and the very cohesion of the groups precludes prolonged individual combat. The submission of the defeated group, rather than unleashing unchecked aggression on the part of the victorious group, reduces both the intensity and frequency of further attack. Monkey groups therefore see to be organized primarily to maintain their established social order rather than to engage in hostilities per se.+ R# H) n8 [/ y" H8 R% F

19 according to the author, studies such as southwick's had which of the following effects on investigators theories about monkeys' social behavior

A they suggested that existing theories about the role of aggression among monkeys did not fully account for the monkey's ability to maintain an established social order.
E they cast doubt on investigators' theories that could account for observed patterns of aggression among monkeys

红色的地方时定位点,我在A E 徘徊,A虽然写的比较大,但是好像还有道理,E除了observed不同意,其它都同意。原文就是说investigators initially believed,那里说观察了?相信=观察?这个相信很肯能是通过其他的方式得出来的,怎么会有观察?

可答案是E。求教了。A太大了我是知道,可是E明显错误啊,原文根本没说是观察得到的。
回应
0

举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
181
注册时间
2008-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2009-5-29 21:30:56 |只看该作者
米有人吗~~ 顶一顶

举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
98
注册时间
2009-5-23
精华
0
帖子
4
板凳
发表于 2009-5-29 23:21:39 |只看该作者
A 说的是 不全对
E 说的是 原来那个理论有问题
所以 本质有区别
而且个人觉得像这种新老交替的 新理论不会是对老的补充的~~~
已有 1 人评分寄托币 收起 理由
frank_chow + 5 我很赞同

总评分: 寄托币 + 5   查看全部投币

举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
57
注册时间
2008-3-27
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2009-5-30 14:29:28 |只看该作者
请问大家这篇阅读的21题 为什么选D 而不是B呢?
It can be inferred from the passage that the establishment and preservation of social order among a group of monkeys is essential in order to...

B control aggressive behavior among group members

D protect individuals  seeking to become members of that group from mass attack

举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
181
注册时间
2008-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
5
发表于 2009-5-30 15:41:31 |只看该作者
4# lian_lyq
精华区有个帖子说这个答案错了。PP3还是PP2上答案是B。但是,假如这一题可以选B,那么剩下22的好像也能选C了:What are the mechanisms by which the social order of an established group of monkeys controls aggression wothin that group?

举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
181
注册时间
2008-11-23
精华
0
帖子
0
6
发表于 2009-5-30 15:44:50 |只看该作者
A 说的是 不全对
E 说的是 原来那个理论有问题
所以 本质有区别
而且个人觉得像这种新老交替的 新理论不会是对老的补充的~~~
zhangjiajun 发表于 2009-5-29 23:21

THX~
不过,原来那个理论确实也不是一无是处啊,对猴子的进攻性作出了一定的解释…… 就是因为有不对的地方,所以才要再做实验吧~
我就是觉得那个OBSERVED 特别碍眼……%>_<%

举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
57
注册时间
2008-3-27
精华
0
帖子
0
7
发表于 2009-5-31 13:37:36 |只看该作者
我的22题就选了C ==

举报

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
57
注册时间
2008-3-27
精华
0
帖子
0
8
发表于 2009-5-31 13:38:28 |只看该作者
5# zenghao0000

我的22题就选了C ==

举报

RE: 请教一道阅读题 97 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
请教一道阅读题 97
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-958398-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
进群抱团
25fall申请群
微信扫码
小程序
寄托留学租房小程序
微信扫码
寄托Offer榜
微信扫码
公众号
寄托天下
微信扫码
服务号
寄托天下服务号
微信扫码
申请遇疑问可联系
寄托院校君
发帖
提问
报Offer
写总结
写面经
发起
投票
回顶部