- 最后登录
- 2012-11-26
- 在线时间
- 98 小时
- 寄托币
- 542
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-25
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 431
- UID
- 2521740
 
- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 542
- 注册时间
- 2008-7-25
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
In this argument, the author concludes that they should decrease their emphasis on international news and refrain from displaying such stories on magazine covers. To support (this)claim, the author assumes that poorest-selling magazine issues over the past three years were those that featured international news stories on their front covers.(是否加个连接词更好,表示这句也在论据中) Over the same period, competing news-magazines have significantly decreased the number of cover stories that they devote to international news. In addition, the author also states that the cost of maintaining foreign bureaus to report on international news is increasing. At first glance, the author’s reasoning seems to be appealing, while clearly examining the author’s reasoning, we may find that it is unconvincing. The argument contains several facets that are questionable.
First of all, through the evidence the author provides, I cannot judge that whether the poorest-selling magazines had featured the other news or stories except (besides)international ones, and whether the best-selling magazines also had featured the new international stories and news. Even though the international stories lead to the sales' decreasing because of lacking depth and interesting analysis. the author cannot convince me that front covers with these sorts of pictures or titles make the reader(s) boring and give up choosing the magazines. It is entirely possible that there are too many advertisements in these magazines, or that the most readers of the magazines are the people who look more about the whole contents in the magazines not(instead of) the ones who only judge magazines by the first look on(at) their covers. So, before the author offers (the) enough evidence, I cannot accept that the international stories in covers result in the ending(最好稍稍重复一下具体的结论).
Secondly, the author makes an oversimplified analogy between his(是否用Newbeat's更好) magazines and the competing ones. In most instances, this is an unwarranted assumption for the simple reason that things rarely remain the same from place to place. Because of(是否用based on 更通顺?) different minds, values, and so on, the people (of)the competing magazines sell(啥意思?啥成分?) are not fond of international or pay little attention to these stories. Besides, we also do not know how the competing news-magazines with fewer international stories sales(缺谓语,而且不通顺。是不是想说 how much is the sales of the competitors in comparison to the original)
In addition, the cost for maintaining for these bureaus is increasing, which doesn’t prove that they cannot gain profits from the magazines which featured the international stories in front covers(感觉这样用定语从句不太好,虽然语法上没有错误。改成: the fact that ... does not (不能缩写)。。。。,which... 是否更好). Maybe over other period, the increasing sales are based on a economic principle: small profits but quick turnover. Or it is also because of the fierce market competition, if they do not increase the cost, they even cannot stand in the industry(。。。读了几遍,觉得去掉 it is ,要不it is 做什么成分?单独的because of 就可以做原因状语了 ).
Finally, the author’s evidence(s) are insufficient to support the conclusion(题中的evidence有三个 你这里只驳斥的第一个 所以还是把它摆出来好). Obviously, the author does not provide enough information. Even th(r)ough I agree that the international stories used as the covers lead to the profits’ reducing, are their(re) other more important factors causing the results? With the development of the technology, more new types for reading news and magazines are pouring to our sight. Portable means of communication increases and the emergence of magazine Web sites, the small and pocket types' growth in magazine sales are all challenges to the traditional magazines.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks of credibility. Regardless of who the author is, he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore(多余) many aspects of his or her conclusion. To strengthen the conclusion, the author should give more evidences about the above-mentioned possibilities.
语言还得加强,虽然俺自己的也不咋地,
逻辑问题我晚点再补上。。。 |
|