- 最后登录
- 2012-5-24
- 在线时间
- 291 小时
- 寄托币
- 857
- 声望
- 10
- 注册时间
- 2008-6-4
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 12
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 763
- UID
- 2501383
 
- 声望
- 10
- 寄托币
- 857
- 注册时间
- 2008-6-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 12
|
发表于 2009-6-24 04:33:19
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 riow 于 2009-6-25 16:07 编辑
总算写完了,困死我了~~
Issue144"It is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.
Although the artists give society mountains of valuable works, we can'tsimply deny the value critics bring to us. That's because, withartists' work as prerequisite, critics can dig for deeper meaning.Further more, on some occasion, critics can create additional valuewhich has not been concluded into the art work due to the background ofthe time. However, unlike the external effect of artists' work,critics' value are all too often ignored or even negated for itsrecessive character.
I concede it is the artists who work to give vitality to their artproduct, which is the foundation. With inferior works, one can hardlygives perfect illumination however hard he tries. Besides, artsproducts, which are made up with devoted efforts and intelligence ofthe author, gives much evocation to the public by itself, which is alsothe main purpose of its creation. Hence we should acknowledge andapprove the artists' labor.
Meanwhile, as it is stated above, what critics do shoud not benegated for its long lasting value neither.Critics evoke the thought ofa certain art work by playing a leading role in digging the deeper'lasting value' in it. [加例子……]Consequentlydeeper thought returns a richer harvest that is not recognized before.On that degree, critics do bring value to us by their insight into thepiece of art, which is regarded as great value contributed by critics.
For their existence, critics make people concentrate more on art,rather than ignore it. With more people focusing on the art, hence morefamiliarity to the art, art's influence to the society is greatlypromoted. Therefore the developments of art progress rapidly. Let'ssay, Roger Fry as a critic, described by the art historian KennethClark as "incomparably the greatest influence on taste since Ruskin",advocated a more recent developments in French painting, to which hegave the name Post-Impressionism. To some degree, as it is said, thepublic taste was changed by Roger Fry.
After that, as it's stated at the beginning, critics also brings valuesdirectly. For example, critics may find some potiential values, whichwas hidden before, but then come into being with the changes of times,values, aesthetic tendencies. These values, due to the objectivelimitations, was not clearly recognised by artists or even not theoriginal purpose of the author, which also has great instructiveness.[例子例子]
In addition, even when a critic is critisizing against a piece of artwork, which is often the fact, it is of great meaning for enlighten thefuture generations, for their negative criticism can be a reference forthe future artistic creation. So this is also a significant valuebrought by critics, who cannot be substituted by artists or any otherpeople.
Nevertheless, we can't negate there're unsuitable criticism hasnegative on art development. But they are minorities, as in everygroups of people exists undesirable person. Overall critics can bring alot of thought and, hence, values on the foundation of original artwork.
例子都还没怎么搜集, 这个周注定是要与例子纠结的一个周啊 |
|