寄托天下
查看: 2187|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 7.8 Argument207 提纲 by GG86_Fly [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
5
寄托币
313
注册时间
2009-5-17
精华
0
帖子
4
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-7-9 12:04:22 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ARGUMENT207 - It is known that in recent years, industrial pollution has caused the Earth's ozone layer to thin, allowing an increase in the amount of ultraviolet radiation that reaches the Earth's surface. At the same time, scientists have discovered, the population of a species of salamander that lays its eggs in mountain lakes has declined. Since ultraviolet radiation is known to be damaging to delicate tissues and since salamander eggs have no protective shells, it must be the case that the increase in ultraviolet radiation has damaged many salamander eggs and prevented them from hatching. This process will no doubt cause population declines in other species, just as it has in the salamander species.

1.
The author concludes that the phenomenon that increased ultraviolet radiation due to the thinning of the Earth’s ozone layer has caused a species of salamander to decline, and will no doubt cause population declines in other species. Carefully examine the author's reasoning, we may find this argument contains several flaws, which render the author's conclusion unconvincing.

2.
First of all, there is no evidence to indicate that the population of the salamander that lays its eggs in mountain has in fact declined.

3.
Secondly, the correlation between ultraviolet radiation and the salamander population does not suffice in itself to prove that the former causes the decline of the latter. There might be other alternative explanations for the decline.

4.
Even if the ultraviolet radiation has damaged many salamander eggs which have no protective shells, the author cannot hastily to infer that it will damage other species.

5.
Finally, the author’s conclusion relied on the assumption that this phenomenon will continue in the future.

6.
To sum up, the author’s conclusion is unconvincing as it stands. To better support this argument, the author should first convince us that the population has decline and this decline has no alternative explanation. Then the author should also provide clear evidence that the ozone layer’s thinning process will continue or even become worse, and must count for why the increased ultraviolet radiation can also damage other species.
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: 7.8 Argument207 提纲 by GG86_Fly [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
7.8 Argument207 提纲 by GG86_Fly
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-981488-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部