|
Should students question a lot or just digest whatever they are given? It is a controversial problem, but, unfortunately, neither is so appropriate to the long and complex process of study. What should the student do? The suggestion is that, firstly, learn to accept some essential knowledge and skills in order to have a solid foundation and a certain skepticism to what they study, and then question what they are taught.（开头还是比较新的，不是常规套路。不管怎样，都得明确地提出观点，这里是通过suggestion来讲的，还是比较明确的，但and then一句有点多余。） 论点：首先接受基础知识，再质疑。
It is an indispensable for a young or freshman to study how to accept the knowledge teaching by the teacher or the experienced. After all, for a freshman or child, it is, totally, a field which they definitely never step in. Since all the knowledge is stranger for them and students lack of the basic skill to digest the knowledge by themselves, it is an indispensable process for everyone who is not similar with new field to begin with learning passively from the teacher who is full of experience and clearly know how to teach you the knowledge. It is, of course, the only path for everyone including the famous scientist such as Galileo and Pasteur as well as the Einstein, to enter their field. In primary school the teacher teaches students the basic skill in life and study. In middle school students are given the method of thought and express. In the college, the professor brings you into your major field. All of those processes are the essential part of one's study and that will even have a far-reaching effect on you further research. In addition, learning from the teacher can help the student have a clearly view of their major and can get a certain skepticism to what they study leading by the teacher. 论证：1.新生接受知识必不可少，深入学习的基础。（我觉得这段有点空，接受知识固然重要，要是再细讲一下除了质疑，初学时期如何理解和消化而不是被动接受这些基础知识很重要，会不会更好）
But it will lead them into a misunderstand-we just need to learn from the teaching, if we just emphasis the importance of learning. Just like artworks made from the same mold, people lost their personality and their creativity. It is the tragedy for the education. 2.过渡，接受知识固然重要，但是创造性也很重要。（这个地方讲创造力是不是不太合适。质疑精神和创造力应该是两码事。虽然下文有提到，但是这里毫无预兆，有点突兀。）
So after acquire the alphabet, it is significant to be able to question about what they are taught. It is an advanced skill that students should acquire which may affect the future development in the research and career. Not only learning the knowledge by teaching, but is it also necessary to think about the course they study. Question about the knowledge reflect the personal thinking which is the base of the creativity. For example, the difference between the famous scientist and the traditional person in the daily life is that the former not only learn by rote but also think in their own way and question about whatever they can't understand. With question and thinking, student can cultivate their interest which is the motivation of study on the major. 3.对于深入研究，质疑也很重要。激发学习的动力。（论证中规中矩，要是能够更明确地点出教育的核心目的是培养学生创造性思维之类…论证会更加深刻。只是一味地讲其好处弊端，米有新意。）
Without the beginning of learning skill and alphabet from the teacher, it is impossible to get a strong foundation which is the base of doing advanced research. Without the question, the study will just stay at the elementary level. It is not imprudent to emphasis both of two aspects, accepting knowledge passively and question concerning what they learn. 结论。中立的观点
遣词造句方面还算流畅，但论证思路、观点比较大众，可以想一想有什么独特的观点，哪怕一点也就够了。
还有观点方面，第一段我似乎读出了接受知识和质疑知识有一个先后关系，是不是在下文可以体现一下，如果违背了先后关系，会怎样...这样会不会有点新意呢。。。 | 
发表于 2009-7-16 14:03:34
签到领寄托币
GO
转发
