0910G[North America Flying]Issue157 by 421899282

421899282UID: 2595732

ISSUE157 - "There is no such thing as purely objective observation. All observation is subjective; it is always guided by the observer's expectations or desires."


The statement claims that all observation is subjective and none of them is purely  objective because of influence of observer's expectations or desires. Even though the  observation could be affected by some subjective factor, it is not comprehensive for  us consequently assert the observation is subjective, which also provide impressive  subjective observation.

Admittedly, observation could be guided by personal expectations or desires. Things  embrace several different aspects, while observation can only cover one or two of them and that depend on personal factor. For example, a cube can be seen as a globe from certain angle. Also, in the case of UFO observation, because of individual  expectations, observers incline to concentrate on an object possessing several features of UFO and neglect the surroundings, thus they may mistake some regular shiny flying object as UFO.

However, we can not conclude all observation is subjective based on some deviation  caused by individual desire. As we all know, most scientific theories are summarized from or verified by the result of observations. The famous Kepler's Law about the planets' movement around Sun is based on the observational data Tycho accumulated in his whole life. Since we have a shiny achievement in the science field instead of subjective theory, it will be ridiculous to consider all these based on all subjective observation.

In addition, the effect subjective factors have on the observation has been realized for a long time. Present observations have included kinds of methods to eliminate it, which leads the deviation caused by subjective factor to be so tiny little that can be oblivious. For example, the experiment always possesses several control groups and the same observation often has several groups of observers. Thus, after integrating the statistics, the final observation result is totally objective.

In sum, somewhat influence of subjective factors is inevitable, however both the achievement based on observation we have already gained and the methods against the influence we have already adopted make the proportion of objectivity far outweighs subjectivity. When one thing possesses two opposite factor at the same time, we certainly define it according to the major one. In this case, the observation is evidently objective instead of subjective.

haunteagleUID: 2609432

The statement claims that all observation is subjective and none of them is purely  objective because of influence of observer's expectations or desires. Even though the observation could be affected by some subjective factor, it is not comprehensive for us consequently assert the observation is subjective, which also provide impressive subjective observation.

Admittedly, observation could be guided by personal expectations or desires. Things embrace several different aspects, while observation can only cover one or two of them and that depend on personal factor. For example, a cube can be seen as a globe from certain angle. Also, in the case of UFO observation, because of individual expectations, observers incline to concentrate on an object possessing several features of UFO and neglect the surroundings, thus they may mistake some regular shiny flying object as UFO.

However, we cannot conclude all observation is subjective based on some deviation caused by individual desire. As we all know, most scientific theories are summarized from or verified by the result of observations. The famous Kepler's Law about the planets' movement around Sun is based on the observational data Tycho accumulated in his whole life. Since we have a shiny achievement in the science field instead of subjective theory, it will be ridiculous to consider all these based on all subjective observation.

In addition, the effect subjective factors have on the observation has been realized for a long time. Present observations have included kinds of methods to eliminate it, which leads the deviation caused by subjective factor to be so tiny little that can be oblivious. For example, the experiment always possesses several control groups and the same observation often has several groups of observers. Thus, after integrating the statistics, the final observation result is totally objective.

In sum, somewhat influence of subjective factors is inevitable, however both the achievement based on observation we have already gained and the methods against the influence we have already adopted make the proportion of objectivity far outweighs subjectivity. When one thing possesses two opposite factor at the same time, we certainly define it according to the major one. In this case, the observation is evidently objective instead of subjective.

正反平衡
1.        开头，点下三段论述重点
2.        同意，认为观测总是存在主观性的，例如说UFO观测
3.        反对，认为现在所有科学理论都是建立在观测上的，举了开普勒和弟谷的例子
4.        反对，现在科学技术手段可以很大程度剔除掉主观因素
5.        结论，重申

主要问题在于两个，举例，结论

举例不是很具体，开普勒的例子可以挖掘很多东西，牛顿基于其理论发现了万有引力，而我们现在的卫星正是基于牛顿的理论，如果说牛顿的理论不是客观的，卫星怎么上天，又怎么能为我们提供气象啊，导航啊，探测啊各种功能呢？我们得承认至少很大程度上，这些理论都是客观正确的

结论仅仅是重复是并不是很令人满意的，结尾的写法应该是文章的自然推论而不是直接重复，就例如说展望未来，我们肯定可以更加客观地认识世界的，或者说，我们能更加客观