- 最后登录
- 2010-11-17
- 在线时间
- 50 小时
- 寄托币
- 98
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-22
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 72
- UID
- 2655993

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 98
- 注册时间
- 2009-6-22
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2009-8-20 11:22:11
|显示全部楼层
Argument
模板上:
大概思路:1“臭名昭著”不代表是晚点次数多 可能是晚点时间长.(这个谬误不是主要的,这不是文章讨论的重点)
2.就算是晚点次数多耶并不一定是缺少跑道引起的
3. 重整海湾因工业化而破坏的湿地不会减少因扰乱潮汐规律对生物造成的破坏
(还可以写一个谬误: 机场答应提供资金,可实际恢复生态环境耗资巨大,它提供不了呢? 缺乏必要的评估,信誓旦旦的保证是没用的)
文章思路清晰,但最大的问题是论证没有充分展开(提出问题后,可以指出作者没有提供充分的证据,而且实际的情况是有很多可能的因素。论证的展开可以用因果关系: 为什么我批评你,而你的错误假设又会造成什么后果等等)
In this argument, the arguer recommends that by filling in 900acres of the bay to build new runways to increase capacity. To substantiate the conclusion, the arguer point out that the reason of(for) flight delays is lack of runways to increase capacity. In addition, the arguer assumes that the airport will fund the restoration of 1,000acres of wetlands that have(has) previously been damaged by industrialization .As it stands, the argument suffers from several critical flaws as follows.
In the first place, the arguer(用author 比较好) falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that the notorious for flight delay is the numbers of delay. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is most likely that the delay time is too long to tolerate for passengers. Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility.
In the second place, the arguer assumes that short of runaways leads to the flight delays .However, there may be other factors that could have caused flight delays. Such as the weather, the loosen discipline of aviator and an careless timetable. So without ruling out such alternative explanations the arguer can not convince me that the lack of runaways necessarily results in the flight delays.
Finally, the arguer assumes that the airport will fund the restoration of wetlands that have previously been damaged by industrialization. However, the Bay Coalition organization objects that the filling will disrupt tidal patterns and harm wildlife. It is not industrial damage, but a biological damage. So the arguer can not safely draw any significant conclusion or prediction.
To sum up. The conclusion reached in the argument lacks credibility since the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To make the argument more convincing ,the arguer should provide more information concerning the filling in the bay to better evaluate the argument. We need more concrete evidence that filling in the bay . otherwise the argument is logically
unacceptable.
Issue
本文的思路很好-从孩子的教育问题入手。但最大的问题是思路就局限在这里了。
题中要求谈“社会的未来与命运”,而文中忽略了。其实可以从教育中谈出去的。 孩子们缺乏社会化,会导致更大的问题:缺乏社会责任感,沟通和交流,而实际上我们的很多社会问题都来源于缺乏人人之间的合作交流:民族、种族问题等等。 只有孩子们能合作,才能应对未来困难,社会才会繁荣
同样,可以用因果关系展开分析的。
大概思路是:
1.现代没有人可以脱离社会,人都是社会的一份子,包括孩子。孩子现在被社会影响在长大后,孩子就变成了建设社会主要力量,所以我们需要从小培养孩子的社会化。很多家长都培养孩子的个人才艺和个性,但不能忽视孩子以后生活在社会中所需要的团结和包容。
2.现在家长从孩子很小的时候就开始培养孩子的才能。包括艺术运动等等特长,这些让孩子看起来在同龄人中更突出,好像这些特殊的才能使孩子能在以后的激烈的竞争中获胜。
3.但是社会化最重要的是与其他的关系。孩子变成大人后也会在社会中有自己的职业和地位,不免要与其他人打交道,这时候良好的人际交往能力起到了重要作用。如果一个人有良好的道德品质和很好的交际手段,会给他带来巨大的成功。历史上有不少很多有才能的人因为缺少高尚的道德品质和同他人正常交流的能力,而不能被人认可,反而浪费了才华。
4.所以家长在培养孩子时,往往会忽视社会化中的社会成员间团结合作的
一面,在道德教育上略有欠缺。所以培养孩子时不仅要培养其个人的才华,也要注意孩子的道德心理培养,兼有个人才华和高尚的品质的人是社会所需要的。
At this time of day no one can opt out of society. Everyone is a member of a society, including
children. And some day the children will become the backbone of the society ,have a power to change the world. So the adult as parents
have the responsible to raise the children to be one for the need of a better society. However, now many parents who have a regard only for the individual talent of the children ignore the importance of moral character and interpersonal skills.
Now many parents focus on their children own particular abilities and talents. Values such as painting ,music, literature
,sports and so on. As if these unique talents which make their children quite outstanding among contemporaries. In future, their children will get the final success in the competition .
Nevertheless, one day(in some cases, over-stressing the) personality maybe become the incompatible factors or even dangerous factors. That is the because the parents disregard the good formation of morality and leading to (the fact that)many children are lack of skills in human(不要human) communication. There are many gifted person in history failed to communicate to others(but laking basci communication skills with others) , be unacceptable or undesirable to sociality ,at last wasting their gift which heaven sends.
In conclusion, when parents raising their children, they need consider training their moral character and social personality. To insure the children be able to live with others
in society in harmony. |
|