Issue17 ugw战队第十一次作业 狠狠的拍吧～！

fenghua9801UID: 2191885

TOPIC: ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

观点：反对
提纲：
1 表明立场
2 法律不能简单的以公正或者不公正来划分，这种观点带有主观性，以个人所得税为例
3 法律是必须遵守的
4 法律需要变化，但是变化的方式不是通过不遵守，而是通过合法的途径。
5 总结


Laws, the structure of the society, can not be simply considered as just or unjust, and although some flaws in them may exist, the citizens need to obey them to make the society more harmony.

First of all, we can not simply interpret the laws, from my point of view, in terms of merely just or unjust, which itself exhibits some subjective. In other words, different people may have different opinions when comes to a particular kind of law. Most of us will probably evaluate it from whether it is just for us or not. On the contrary, the law is established for the benefits of the whole society instead of some individuals during a period; therefore, it inevitably will benefit the majority at the expense of the minority. Nevertheless, it can strike a balance among the competing interests and therefore make the society more harmony and advance in the correct direction. Take the income taxation for example; the percentage of it may vary considerably according to the different incomes: higher ones need to pay more percentage while the lower ones need to pay less. From the lower ones point of views, they may regard the law to be just since they pay less. But the high income person may raise the question naturally that why I need to pay more from what I earned? Definitely they consider the law is unjust to him. As a result, the fairness of the law depends largely on individuals' personal value systems, and we cannot simply classify them into the just or unjust categories.

In a democratic country, the purpose of the law is to regulate the daily life, and all of us need to obey it no matter we consider it is just or not. If the dignity of the laws is challenged, the society will result in turmoil. For example, the law prohibit the social discrimination seems unjust for certain group of people who believe that they are superior to the others. Were all of them to behave as their will with no regard of the laws, the society will return to the states full of violent controversy and endless segregation, on which Martin Luther King spent all his lifetime trying to change. Every member of the society has personal interest which may against the law, but it is our obligation to comply with it.

However, since the laws are not perfect always and everywhere, we need to modify them as the progress of the society, but the method to perform this is not by disobedience. Although disobedience may contribute to the reformation to some extent, someone may suffer a lot for the changes since the laws are enforced by the government. However, in a democracy, anyone who feels that a particular law is flawed can seek to change it by lawful means.

In conclusion, the holy laws need to be respect and obeyed in order to make our society peaceful, orderly, and relatively stable. However, they need to be modified in accordance with the changes and the most efficient way to perform it is through a reasonable path instead of disobedience.

[ 本帖最后由 fenghua9801 于 2006-7-28 16:59 编辑 ]

xupeng66UID: 2193287

Laws, the structure of the society, can not be simply considered as just or unjust, and although some flaws in them may exist, the citizens need to obey them to make the society more harmony.

First of all, we can not simply interpret the laws, from my point of view, in terms of merely just or unjust, which itself exhibits some subjective. In other words, different people may have different opinions when comes to a particular kind of law. Most of us will probably evaluate it from whether it is just for us or not. On the contrary, the law is established for the benefits of the whole society instead of some individuals during a period; therefore, it inevitably will benefit the majority at the expense of the minority. Nevertheless, it can strike a balance among the competing interests and therefore make the society more harmony and advance in the correct direction. Take the income taxation for example; the percentage of it may vary considerably according to the different incomes: higher ones need to pay more percentage while the lower ones need to pay less. From the lower ones point of views, they may regard the law to be just since they pay less. But the high income person may raise the question naturally that why I need to pay more from what I earned? Definitely they consider the law is unjust to him. As a result, the fairness of the law depends largely on individuals' personal value systems, and we cannot simply classify them into the just or unjust categories.（这个地方的例子举得不是很恰当，并不是所有的富人都认为交更多的水是不公平的，从这个例子得出结论有些牵强）。（可以从矛盾更加明显的方面举例）应该加强一下对遵守法律带来的好处的论证

In a democratic country, the purpose of the law is to regulate the daily life, and all of us need to obey it no matter we consider it (is) just or not. If the dignity of the laws is challenged, the society will result in turmoil. For example, the law prohibit the social discrimination seems unjust for certain group of people who believe that they are superior to the others.（这个地方的例子也不是很恰当，毕竟种族歧视是一种可耻的行为，他们没有理由为自己辩护） Were all of them to behave as their will with no regard of the laws, the society will return to the states full of violent controversy and endless segregation, on which Martin Luther King spent all his lifetime trying to change. Every member of the society has personal interest which may against the law, but it is our obligation to comply with it.

However, since the laws are not perfect always and everywhere, we need to modify them as the progress of the society, but the method to perform this is not by disobedience. Although disobedience may contribute to the reformation to some extent, someone may suffer a lot for the changes since the laws are enforced by the government. However, in a democracy, anyone who feels that a particular law is flawed can seek to change it by lawful means.（这一段感觉没有把问题说清楚，可能时时间不够了吧，其实前两段的论证可以合为一段，简化一些，同时加强一下这一段关于反抗不公正法律的论述）

In conclusion, the holy laws need to be respect and obeyed in order to make our society peaceful, orderly, and relatively stable. However, they need to be modified in accordance with the changes and the most efficient way to perform it is through a reasonable path instead of disobedience.

fenghua9801UID: 2191885

谢谢了，这篇文章我自己觉得没什么可写的

也觉得例子不太好
你有什么好的例子吗？？