issue17 【Victors小组】第十一次作业 by baiyu_2005

baiyu_2005UID: 2255194

17. "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.

Which is more important: follow the just law, or resist the unjust one? As for me, the former one is more critical and proper than the later one and follow the latter one may cause serious problem. Because it is not just or unjust that can describe the law fully; different era often have different criterion of justice and resist unjust one may lead to a big chaos.

First of all, laws could not be classified as two different, or even contrary, group, just group and unjust one. For example, some racial discriminated laws that exist in the first half of last century is absolutely just for most white people in the Unite State, for the inherent superiority held by them. Nevertheless when it come to the eyes of black people, justice is just a camouflage of slavery endowed in the name of law, the paramount rule for the whole society. It is as the same when the discriminated laws were first abolished, according to the topic’s idea the white people who though their just right was invaded should resist against the laws that provide every one the same right. It is ridiculous for most of us.

Also, even for the same people, his\her opinion on justice would change, and sometime convert, during the changing of the whole society and the economical environment. Now days whosever property are confiscated by the nation would complain or even demonstrate for the act. But when we scrutinize the era during the World War Two, when all citizen held the same idea: against Nazi and rescue the world from the hand of devil without considering anything else. It were regarded as a glory to provide something that the nation need. As the development of the ideology of every person under changeable circumstance, it is hasty to assert a law just or unjust if we see it without considering the era background as sometimes we actually do.

Next hold the idea that people should resist the unjust law may bring chaos and even disasters for the entire human beings. Admitted, sometimes the kind of act actually furthers the improvement of the society as Martin Luther King whose against movement overwhelm the lasting discrimination against the black people in America. However as we stated before usually it is not easy to differentiate the two, so it is possible some people render the whole country under a huge chaos if they take their anti-society action in the name of against unjust laws if people think they should against when they think it unjust. And on the other hand, if we has the habit of against the “unjust” laws we may ignore other people’s right and see every thing just based on our own subjective idea.

To sum up, it is laws that endow us rights and responsibilities for the modern society. For the steady and improvement we should not see the laws as just and unjust subjectively and even more to take act against the law with violent means, sometimes a usual way.

乳虎UID: 2251211

17. "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws.

Which is more important: follow the just law, or resist the unjust one? As for me, the former one is more critical and proper than the later one and [follow删]  the latter one may cause serious problem . Because it is not just or unjust that can describe the law fully[CHIGLISH Because it is difficult to describe laws as just or unjust]; different era often have different criterion of justice and[so]  resist unjust one may lead to a big chaos.

First of all, laws could not be classified as two different, or even contrary, group, just group and unjust one. For example, some racial discriminated laws that exist in the first half of last century is absolutely just for most white people in the Unite State, for the inherent superiority held by them. Nevertheless whenit come to the eyes of black people[ in  the eyes of black people], justice is just a camouflage of slavery endowed in the name of law, the paramount rule for the whole society. It is as the same [Similarly] when the discriminated laws were first abolished, according to the topic’s idea the white people who though their just right was invaded should resist against the laws that provide every one the same right. It is ridiculous for most of us.

Also, even for the same people, his\her opinion on justice would change, and sometime convert, during[according to]  the changing of the whole society and the economical environment. Now days whosever property are confiscated by the nation [先行词，引导词何在？] would complain or even demonstrate for the act. But when we scrutinize the era during the World War Two, when all citizen held the same idea: against Nazi and rescue the world from the hand of devil without considering anything else. It were[was] regarded as a glory to provide something that the nation need. As the development of the ideology of every person under changeable circumstance, it is hasty to assert a law just or unjust if we see it without considering the era background [as sometimes we actually do删]. [例子欠妥，二战时人们是主动为国家做贡献，并没有法律强制他们这样做]

Next hold the idea that people should resist the unjust law may bring chaos and even disasters for the entire human beings. Admitted, sometimes the kind of act actually furthers the improvement of the society as Martin Luther King whose against [resistance] movement overwhelm the lasting discrimination against the black people in America. However as we stated before usually it is not easy to differentiate the two, so it is possible[for]  some people[to]  render the whole country under a huge chaos if they take their anti-society action in the name of against unjust laws if people think they should against when they think it unjust[怎么连用了两个条件状语从局，改]. And on the other hand, if we has the habit of against the “unjust” laws we may ignore other people’s right and see every thing just based on our own subjective idea.

To sum up, it is laws that endow us rights and responsibilities for the modern society. For the steady and improvement we should not see the laws as just and unjust subjectively and even more to take act against the law with violent means, sometimes a usual way.