Issue56 追星剑特训1.5作业 必回拍

linakUID: 155465

Issue56. Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this increasingly complex society, more and more problems, even emergencies exist than ever, while the governments do not have enough money and energy to deal with every problem. Does that mean the governors should pay more attention on resolving immediate problems while ignore anticipating problems of the future? Considering that the purpose of human beings is to make our earth a much better one, I insist that both the immediate problems and potential ones should be focused on by the governments.

Admittedly, the immediate problems should be resolved as soon as possible otherwise they will stand on the way of the development of our society. There are many these problems in every society, such as crimes, wars, drag abuse, unemployment and so on, and these problems suffer people a lot. With the existence of crimes, many people were robber, stole, or even murdered, while the persons who accused the crimes were posted into prison, both of which destroyed ingrates of thousands of families; every time when war happened, millions of people died and outcaste; be addicted with drags, an alive man prefer to death; because of unemployment, many families do not have avenues to subsist. If the governments do not hesitate to resolve these immediate problems, their people can not even live well, how can we say make our earth or our society a better one?

However, governments' focus on solving the immediate problems does not mean that they can ignore to try to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Sometimes the potential problems are much more harmful than the immediate ones if they are not foreseen. A striking example is the flood of china in 1998. People of the nation did not cherish the forests, in order to benefit themselves; they just hewed the trees blindly for building or other purpose. Consequently, these deeds make forests become deserts, which get their deserved result-the flood. It is the ignorance of the anticipated problems that brings people this disaster. The purpose of us is to make our earth better; therefore, we should consider both the immediate problems and the potential ones. A trivial thing we do now may play a significant roll on the development of our offspring.

Therefore, governments should focus both on solving the immediate problems and the anticipated problems of future as well. Things governments should consider is not weather immediate problems or potential ones should be paid more attention but which problems can draw more harmful affects if they are not been solved. If the immediate problems are very urgent, so governments should try their best to solve them; while if the potential problems will bring bigger sufferings if they are not anticipated, governments should try to resolve these problems. Only by striking a balance between the two can governments make our dreams come true.

To sum up, the author oversimplified the statement by saying that Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. After a detailed consideration, I prefer to pay attention to them both.

1900_oneoneUID: 2104750

难怪没有人改
写的太好了，谁还改啊
除了一些小小的拼写和语法的不妥，ETS都不管的毛病，俺们也没有兴趣哈

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

明天还考试
明天晚上改或者后天改

imongUID: 140258

这道题目问的是more 为什么THESIS句写both.

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

Issue56. Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this increasingly complex society, more and more problems, even emergencies exist than ever, while the governments do not have enough money and energy to deal with every problem. Does that mean the governors should pay more attention on resolving immediate problems while ignoreignore的意思是你自己转换过来的吧,more than 关系如何看出来另一个就被ignore了？ anticipating problems of the future? Considering that the purpose of human beings is to make our earth a much better one, I insist that both the immediate problems and potential ones should be focused on by the governments.同蒙蒙的意见，问的是比较关系，哪个更要focus on，又不是管一个就不要另一个，为啥要说both？有偏题的趋势了，再看看下文的。

Admittedly, the immediate problems should be resolved as soon as possible otherwise they will stand on the way of the development of our society. There are many these problems in every society, such as crimes, wars, drag abuse, unemployment and so on, and these problems suffer people a lot. With the existence of crimes, many people were robber, stole, or even murdered, while the persons who accused the crimes were posted into prison, both of which destroyed ingrates of thousands of families; every time when war happened, millions of people died and outcaste; be addicted with drags, an alive man prefer to death; because of unemployment, many families do not have avenues to subsist. If the governments do not hesitate to resolve these immediate problems, their people can not even live well, how can we say make our earth or our society a better one?

However, governments' focus on solving the immediate problems does not mean that they can ignore 确实does not mean they can ignore啊，是你自己加入的猜测，哼to try to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Sometimes the potential problems are much more harmful than the immediate ones if they are not foreseen. A striking example is the flood of china in 1998. People of the nation did not cherish the forests, in order to benefit themselves; they just hewed the trees blindly for building or other purpose. Consequently, these deeds make forests become deserts, which get their deserved result-the flood. It is the ignorance of the anticipated problems that brings people this disaster. The purpose of us is to make our earth better; therefore, we should consider both the immediate problems and the potential ones. A trivial thing we do now may play a significant roll on the development of our offspring.

Therefore, governments should focus both 又是bothon solving the immediate problems and the anticipated problems of future as well. Things governments should consider is not weather immediate problems or potential ones should be paid more attention but which problems can draw more harmful affects if they are not been solved. If the immediate problems are very urgent, so governments should try their best to solve them; while if the potential problems will bring bigger sufferings if they are not anticipated, governments should try to resolve these problems. Only by striking a balance between the two can governments make our dreams come true.

To sum up, the author oversimplified the statement by saying that Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. After a detailed consideration, I prefer to pay attention to them both.
这篇内容上读起来不错，但是仔细看下题目，是有个很严重的问题的。注意比较关系。1，那个每段的TS都有些别扭的说， more than 关系，要比较比较，哪个更需要focus on 虽然你最后说了要balance但是前面的各段TS一直都是顾这个就不要哪个，顾这个就不能忽视那个，B3显然是要两手都抓的意思，对题目做这样的变换好像不太合适。从举例啊分析啊语言啊等都还不错，但是这个比较关系一直没有体现，还需要大修改一下的。呵呵

victoriazhizhiUID: 163135

1.5是not but题目 你怎么搞了个more than的题目然后就按not but写了？

fatluoUID: 191214

个人觉得“more than"之中就有“ignore"的含义。既然题目中作者都觉得，如果现实问题没有解决好，就应该弃将来问题于不顾，这还不叫“ignore"吗？
其实很多时候，我们初看题目的时候，总是对题目中的一些词较真儿的去看、去分析，结果把自己弄到一个很尴尬的境地，都不知道怎么动笔写。再看老外的范文，发现其实他们根本就没有严格的区分一些词的细微差别，只要是大概意思差不多，就可以。所以写起来就觉得很流畅。
况且，对要辩驳的题目进行一个自己的定义，甚至“偷换概念“，这不都是在辩论中常用的技巧吗？

OB叔UID: 188695

占座先

黯UID: 2107524

占个位置~
:)