- 最后登录
- 2009-8-25
- 在线时间
- 450 小时
- 寄托币
- 32546
- 声望
- 45
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-25
- 阅读权限
- 175
- 帖子
- 749
- 精华
- 17
- 积分
- 12125
- UID
- 193479
   
- 声望
- 45
- 寄托币
- 32546
- 注册时间
- 2005-1-25
- 精华
- 17
- 帖子
- 749
|
A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
In the era of [with] the development of the modern society, more and more high schools want to define their own curriculum depending [on] the concrete curriculum. It has triggered a new round [of] debate in the modern world because it affects every student who will enter colleges or universities. Some maintain that the lesson in the high school should be required [determined] by the nation, some argue that only allowing the schools determine what curriculum could let the students learn by their interests, still some people do not have any idea about it at all. In my opinion, the nation should have the uniform curriculum no matter where the school is located.
At first glance, allowing the school choose the lessons seems [to be] reasonable. It cannot be denied that, students could learn the knowledge better if he or she is interested in the lesson. John, a friend of mine, once said, "Just the interest could spur me to learn it well." What is more, without the compulsory, students may have more free time to study the knowledge deeply. As a survey demonstrate, more and more students complain that they have not enough time to do what they want to do. [这样的survey如果不是有名有实的话,很难让人信服。]
However, granting the school the power to choose its own curriculum will also make much trouble, for example, the curriculum designed by local schools would make students to be limited in a narrow field too early. Maybe he or she does know what is his or her interest for his or her young age, but he or she must choose the major. What is more, the lesson decided by local schools may not include the basic knowledge, such as computer skill, mathematics, physics and so on. [这个感觉有点悖理;或者你要说学校没有条件提供这些课程。] The students would find themselves lack much of the basis when they want to research more deeply in colleges or universities. A college president once said, "What we need is the person who have the general skills and knowledge although he or she should choose his or her own major."
On the contrary, the curriculum determined by nation would avoid the problem. On [the] one hand, the students will not possibly meet trouble such as lacking much basic knowledge, so they would find themselves are treated fairly in class. On the other hand, professors would find it easy when showing the college students the knowledge without regarding the problem mentioned above.
Albeit granting every school the power to choose its own curriculums is impossible, some school could also offer some un-compulsory [ones] to the students to cater their interest. It will build the charisma of the school and could inspire students to do more their favorite research. However, the automation should not exceed some standard as to prevent those essential subjects from being ignored.
In a world, the curriculum should be required by the nation. Not only do the students be offered the basic knowledge, but also it will be welcomed by the college and universities. Some schools could be granted to make their own un-compulsory lessons, but those should not be over emphasized. [结尾只是简单地对前面的内容做了个概括,用处不大。]
有一点要指出的是:文章里虽然花了一定的篇幅论述了“地方决定课程”的缺点,但是并没有很多地篇幅讲国家安排统一课程的好处,这样一来显得重点不够突出。因为“地方课程有缺陷”不等于“相应的国家统一课程就是优点”。 |
|