issue17 第一次限时 很恶心……大家帮忙看一下

kionaUID：207479

TOPIC：ISSUE 17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
WORDS：458          TIME：0:45:00          DATE：2005-9-9

Can the laws be divided into two types: just and unjust? And should we only obey just laws and disobey unjust laws as the speaker cites? It is hard to say. But in my views, the speaker is too extreme. I will cite my opinion following under three points.

To begin with, the laws cannot be divided into just and unjust. We cannot determine which law is just from its appearance. One apt example is about Marijuana. Marijuana is legislation in some countries of the world for its medical use, which reduces the patient's pain, such as the patients suffering cancer or other illnesses. But in the most places of the world, marijuana is not legislation, such as Alaska of the United States. So we can easily say, in former parts, the law of allowing Marijuana as a kind of medicine is just for patients who suffer cancers. But unjust for the people who opposite the law. In short, we cannot regard the law as  simple just and unjust.

In addition, whether a law is just or unjust depends on the personal interests. For example, a law, which is control the toxic effluents containing in a factory emit in the nearby river in order to protect the citizen's health. To the citizen, it is a just law, because it is protect their rights. But to the factory, it might be unjust, because if the factory obeys the law, the cost of the factory will be increasing. Perhaps the factory will fire some employs, or perhaps the factory will raise its production costs. To the consume of the production of the factory, they do not want to see its high price. In other words, it is too one-sided to say a law is just or unjust only depends one person’s view.

Finally, sometimes, we disobey the unjust laws might conduce us to an opposite result.  Back to the example mentioned in the second paragraph, if we disobey the law of forbidding Marijuana as a kind of medicine, there will be more and more cancer or the other illnesses patients suffering the pain, which caused by the illnesses. Another example is about abortion, in some countries, abortion is not allowed by the law, if we disobey the law, there will be many people punished by the law, because sometimes, they are not willing to conceit. So, only disobey the unjust law may be not a wise choice.

In sum, law is not telling a person what he should do. Law is the rule to protect the person who lives in the danger. So, we cannot do as the speaker’s conclusion. Obey the law is the rights of the people who live in the world, because of the peace of the world.

foreveraUID：202035

Can the laws be divided into two types: just and unjust? And should we only obey just laws and disobey unjust laws as the speaker cites? It is hard to say. But in my views, the speaker is too extreme. I will cite my opinion following under three points.

To begin with, the laws cannot be divided into just and unjust. We cannot determine which law is just from its appearance意思太含糊. One apt example is about Marijuana. Marijuana is legislation 好象意思不通啊in some countries of the world for its medical use, which reduces the patient's pain, such as the patients suffering cancer or other illnesses. But in the most places of the world, marijuana is not legislation, such as Alaska of the United States. So we can easily say, in former parts, the law of allowing Marijuana as a kind of medicine is just for patients who suffer cancers. But unjust for the people who opposite the law. 这里也没有说出来为什么不能这么划分法律啊。。。例子也不典型In short, we cannot regard the law as  simple just and unjust.

In addition, whether a law is just or unjust depends on the personal interests. For example, a law,语法错误啊。。。。 which is control the toxic effluents containing in a factory emit 词性 in the nearby river in order to protect the citizen's health. To the citizen, it is a just law, because it is protect their rights. But to the factory, it might be unjust, because if the factory obeys the law, the cost of the factory will be increasing. Perhaps the factory will fire some employs, or perhaps the factory will raise its production costs. To the consume of the production of the factory, they do not want to see its high price. In other words, it is too one-sided to say a law is just or unjust only depends one person’s view.

Finally, sometimes, we disobey the unjust laws might conduce 用的准确吗？us to an opposite result什么后果？？.  Back to the example mentioned in the second paragraph, if we disobey the law of forbidding Marijuana as a kind of medicine, there will be more and more cancer or the other illnesses patients suffering the pain, which caused by the illnesses. Another example is about abortion, in some countries, abortion is not allowed by the law, if we disobey the law, there will be many people punished by the law, because sometimes, they are not willing to conceit. So, only disobey the unjust law may be not a wise choice.

In sum, law is not telling a person what he should do. Law is the rule to protect the person who lives in the danger. So, we cannot do as the speaker’s conclusion. Obey the law is the rights of the people who live in the world, because of the peace of the world.


感觉文章论证有点单薄。。。例子也不够典型。。。也没有很紧的和主题联系起来。。。句子和段落之间的层次感也有待加强。。。

kionaUID：207479

不行！太紧张了！好多东西都没有注意到，我都没有改就直接发上来了！

foreveraUID：202035

看看我那篇