- 最后登录
- 2013-3-16
- 在线时间
- 197 小时
- 寄托币
- 836
- 声望
- 2
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-19
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 734
- UID
- 182812
 
- 声望
- 2
- 寄托币
- 836
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
观点:的确,全面发展是教育的目的,但大学所做的,更多是培养一个对社会有用的专业人才。因此不同意作者的大学应该要求每个学生都参加其本研究领域外的课程。
1、一个人的德、智、体、美全面发展是教育的目的。
2、大学应该做的是为社会培养一个有用的专业人才。
3、大学应该为学生提供一个学习的大舞台,至于学习专业外的科目,依自身兴趣爱好而定。
限时没成功,超了半个小时,唉!
The speaker assert that universities should require each student take a wide course beside his or her own field of study in that it is the best way to gain truly educated(true education)However, in my views, I fundamental disagree with the issue as follows in my article, even though I concede that acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the true purpose of education.
To begin with, admittedly, the purpose of education is to enable people gain comprehensive development, which will be beneficial to the society. Each people from primary school to college is no doubt to experience a variety of education endowed by family, school, and society. We receive formal knowledge which is a system discipline such as math, Chinese, history, geography, P.E(最好别写简称了)and so forth. Math teaches us a logic calculation capacity; Chinese enable us to learn our native literature; History makes us to be access to our country and the world development process; Geography can lead us to a wide eye open to the status and custom of various countries in the earth. P.E. endowed us a strong physical condition, which may be basis of our study and work in the future. All these subjects are precisely from primary school to middle school before we go to university. Consequently, we gain the comprehensive development that is the goal pursuit by education.(有些想不通 你的论点已经明确的说出是关于大学生要不要辅修其他课程 在这段中你为什么一直在说上大学前的教育的核心呢?
However, it was the opposite case When we enroll in the college in that what universities should do is not so much adopt students various skills as to foster students to be a true useful expertise to the society.(what universities should do is not so much adopt students various skills is not so much adopt ???看不懂 如果我写 what universities should do is not to simply indoctrinate various skills to students rather than to foster….) When we enter a wide stage in our life, there, we may choice our interested major at will which will be no longer restricted in previous time just because the universities provide us so various majors involving nature science, humanity science, and social science. (When entering a wide stage after enrolling in the university, we may choice the majors according to our interests, which are no longer restricted as in the middle schools, because the universities…..你看这句这么改行么)In such short four years universities life, we have many courses about our own discipline field of study to learn. (of study 就去掉吧) Even though I concede that university students should be furnished with more comprehensive knowledge than students in the middle school, I more agree that students should study his or her academic discipline. (这点的逻辑比较乱 我理不太清 在一段中比较忌讳内容上的相反的让步)After all it is not easy that the fund of nation apply to the university education. It is pity, even ridiculous, that a math major student is going to remedy patients after his graduate. (a math major student is going to remedy patients after his graduate这句话放在这是什么意思呢) It is obvious a huge waste to the education resource. In a word, university should adopt student’s expertise as possible as it can rather than both wasting time and fund to educate students a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
I concede that students in universities should acquire all-sided development. However, it is not the duty of the university. As a college student, especially as an adult, they have capacity to choose courses outside their academic disciplines in term of different interest and hobby. Through choosing relative subjects with their major, it is no doubt to be beneficial effects to the development of his or her discipline. For example, we have no reasons to disagree the assertion that math course will be conduce to the computer major. Consequently, students should involve varieties of knowledge according to individual rather than attributing the duty to the university, which have provided a stage like a society to wait us express our capacities of diversity.
All in all, I agree that the purpose of education is to enable people to have a health and comprehensive development, which will be useful to the society in the future. The universities, as a special education stage should place emphasis to adopt expertise human resource other than requiring students to take myriads of courses dispersing energy outside his or her major. |
|