- 最后登录
- 2007-1-3
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 326
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-3-23
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 237
- UID
- 2199703

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 326
- 注册时间
- 2006-3-23
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Now adays Nowadays, education has experienced an dramatic reformation which resulted from both technique and civial developing. This reformation has aroused so many controversial issues especially in the aera of educational system construction. As to me, some kind of relativism may be better than go to the extremes.
In this era of competition and vanity, inkstand instand of simply take taking education as some kind of self-perfection progress, many of us treat it(最好用从句可能清楚些吧) like pre-career training. Only from this aspect, the problem of the efficiency of education can get its significance. Though it seemed a little over-positive, the prosperous of various form forms of education, such as far-reach distance education, night schools TAFE, continuing education, and so forth, will strongly convince us that there is an enormous success to offer specifically designed education to meet the individual needs and interest. In Europe, some countries has began to encourage students to entry into specified technique schools other than their traditional choice of ordinary high schools after the graduation of primary education. As officially stated, this will help youngersters to develop their own advantages and become successful in their career exclude scholars. To some extent, it's true that if you only want to be a happy plumber, why you have to spend your time in the endless high school study?
Moreover, except for the fleet changing of its form, the contemporary education also become specifically designed in its content. Even in the junior high school, many students have the choice to take more classes in the field they are good at or interested in, not to mention the extracurricular activities. I have an Australian friend who want to be a craft driver and has chosen to study calculus when she was in junior high. As an comparison, her brother's interest is in literature. Unlike many Chinese students who have to study the whole integral subjects from chemistry to history, they have some limited but still freedom to ignore the subject they feel useless. One's meal maybe another's poison, why shouldn't we just offer them what they want and become both pleasant and effective?
The answer to the questions mentioned above is simple: there are some kind of nutrition, which maybe minus but are able to cause fatal diseases, they couldn't get unless they have balanced diet. To a sociaty society, it couldn't measure exactly how more efficient a well educated man will function, just like we couldn't measure the contribution a balanced meal will do to our health. But we do know if we keep eating the junk food, we probably will get ill for lack of vitamin, or other nutrition. It is the same that if the society keeps producing citizens with only specified expertises; its health may be in danger. To make our education more health, we need to teach more about the common morals like duties to family and society, honesty, thrifty, etc, basic thinking principals including both the reasoning ones and the article ones, and the ability to enjoy some really beautiful things of our civilization. Only if we do this rightly, the life would be a pleasant procedure to go with our neigbours.
In the end, we should all acknowledge that specified education is the main trend of the world and has bring us a lot of convenience. If only we noticed it’s fallacies we could use it better without hurt ourselves.
文章好像和教育的有效的相关性不是很大,前面第二,三段从教育多样性和教育的可选择角度讲述,缺乏中心意思,就是没有围绕为什么说教育多样性就能体现出是很有效果的,和为什么说教育可以特殊化,让人随心选择就代表了教育的有效.下面的第四段的反证我觉得比上面讲的清楚,有论点.我自己写的也是这样的问题,没有把题目分析清楚就下笔.不过你的论述的例子还是挺好的 |
|