- 最后登录
- 2008-5-8
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 183
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-22
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 135
- UID
- 2119955

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 183
- 注册时间
- 2005-7-22
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
When it comes to education, whether it should meet each student's individual needs and interests is a controversial issue. The speaker asserts that only when education meets each student's individual needs and interests(为避免和前面的重复,可以适当的换一种表达) it will be effective. While I agree that inner interests and individual needs acts as impetus and catalyst in the process of achieving individual success and social progress, I insist that the speaker's idea is ideal and parochial.
Admittedly, each student whose intellect, character and interests are quite different from others is unique. The same curriculum, schedule, teacher and the method teacher used cannot suit for each student. That is to say if teacher didn't(cannot,书面语中好像不能用缩写) teach students in accordance of(with) their aptitude(aptitudes?), education would be inefficient. Take, (逗号是不是要去掉) the whiz kids (also called a child prodigy) who endow with high intelligence quotient, extraordinary curiosity and self-absorption for example, they always cannot adapt to the common education so that the teachers and students around them consider them as eccentric. Thus, the whiz kids sometimes will be neglected. What is more, interests are the best teacher, the inner needs and interests impel the students to devote, strive and endeavor for achieving success. As we cast a look back at the history of technology and science, it is possible to find that inner interests and curiosity play a significant role (+in education).(提纲中提及的是“承认专门设计来满足每个学生个人需求和兴趣的教育是有效和有益的” 举神通的例子是否过于片面)
However, implementing the policy to meet each student's needs and interests is utopian. Firstly, when education becomes a public service provided by the government, it should serve all the students of the country. How enormous the work is to explore each student's interests and needs. More and more teachers will be needed, more and more apparatus will be used, more and more efforts should be made, more and more money should be invested, yet the fund used in education is limited. Secondly, interests and needs are variable factor(factors). (When an infant--the future student was born, he came to the world without any innate interests to the outward surroundings. The infant only receives some external stimulation to recognize the world which is strange to him. His interests are influenced by the people around him and surroundings. He may be interested in astronomy at six years old, while at twelve years old he was wild about math. )(时态是不是有点乱,一般现在时?过去时?)As his knowledge became richer and richer, his interests changed unceasingly. Therefore it is ridiculous to design some special programs to meet his needs and interests in education.
Furthermore, why I assert that the speaker's thought is parochial dues to the education's purpose and efficiency. The aim of education is to cultivate students' moral sense and value system, to give them essential courses such as math, art, literature. Provided that one student's curriculum schedule is only designed to meet his interests and needs, this student cannot make great achievement (achievements) because of limited knowledge. Even if he achieves great success, without regard to morality he can (would) become destructive to our society. A computer virus can better illustrate this point: some people intend to program computer virus to infringe on others’ computer (computers), in 1988 the computer virus designed by an American student resulted in economic loss about one million dollars. Consequently, how can we say that this form of education is effective?(例子中要适当说明,教育给予要设计病毒的人一定的帮助)
In sum, educators cannot deny the advantages of education designed to meet each student's needs and interests, whereas they should place more emphasis on foundational and moral education. Based on this, educators can provide kinds of courses for students to choose according to their needs and interests. This style of education, I think, is most efficient. |
|