- 最后登录
- 2007-8-13
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 2315
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-19
- 阅读权限
- 30
- 帖子
- 6
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 2083
- UID
- 2130338
 
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 2315
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-19
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 6
|
这篇比较简单,所以限时成功了,庆祝一下下~
Issue38 第7篇 让砖头来得更猛烈些吧!
------摘要------
作者:寄托家园作文版普通用户 共用时间:45分45秒 485 words
从2006年5月27日17时48分到2006年5月27日18时45分
------题目------
In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books.
------正文------
Human beings are in the age of television. Children watch cartoons every evening; housewives watch series every afternoon; and husbands watch sports games every night. Television provides people entertainment, information, as well as knowledge, and it seems that reading books is not as important as it once was. However, people can never learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books, because obtaining knowledge from television is restricted by television stations in both contents and speeds.
First of all, people cannot learn as deep as they like by watching television, while they can achieve that target by reading books. Because television programs are so costly that they have to obtain financial supplies from audience or advertisements, the popularity is the most crucial characteristic for television stations to decide their program lists. As a matter of fact, television stations cannot put programs which are not favored by the vast majority of their audience into their broadcast plans. Nevertheless, individual interests vary from one to another. Some are extremely interested in mathematics, while some others are considerably enthusiastic in history. Though they may dabble in some other knowledge in the broad area of both science and culture, they are not likely to become interested in a deep exploration of the same domain. Therefore, deep research and exploration cannot become accessible to television audience. On the contrary, publications and journals are not so costly as television programs, and financial supplies are available through many ways. Thus, scientific or cultural knowledge, not matter how difficult to understand, can be discussed and studied in books. People cannot learn as deep by watching television as they can by reading books.
Besides, people are not able to study knowledge as fast as they want, whereas they can reach that target by reading books. The pace of television programs is controlled by television stations, according to the average accepting ability of the majority of audience and the profits they can receive from advertisements. Children cannot see the next day's cartoons no matter how eagerly they want to know the evolvement of stories. Housewives cannot see the following day's series no matter how much they expect to know the fate of characters. Similarly, audience cannot obtain the knowledge in the next day's television programs, even though such knowledge is available in any book stores, in publications and journals. Unlike watching television, people can purchase or borrow books as many as they like, and absorb knowledge as fast as they want. Therefore, people cannot learn as fast by watching television as they can by reading books.
In conclusion, people can neither gain knowledge as deep as they like, nor absorb knowledge as fast as they want only by watching television. Books, such as publications and journals, offer people various choices of knowledge variety and studying pace. As a result, though reading books may become not as important as it once was, it is impossible for reading books to be replaced by watching television. |
|