ISSUE167 [越洋农场站队] 限时 第十次作业 写于半梦半醒间

WWWXXX2UID: 2143598

想写几个新的方向,结果还是失败了....
早上本来想8点起,结果一觉睡到10点……迷迷糊糊就开始写
我发现我政治类都写的不怎么样啊……可能和兴趣有关哈

TOPIC: ISSUE167 - "It is impossible for an effective political leader to tell the truth all the time. Complete honesty is not a useful virtue for a politician."
WORDS: 505         TIME: 0:50:00          DATE: 2006-8-2

As we all know and some movies or TV series reveal to us, the politic realm is a field that full of lies and cheats. So whether the honesty is useless or not, for a politician who want to be an effective leader? In my point of view, a political leader lost his quantity to be a leader at the just moment when he abandons his honesty quality.

First and foremost, the honesty of political leader is required by a well developed society--------democratic society in which people own the right to know exactly what they want and express their points freely. The truth behind the politics are always revealed several realms such as economy, mass media, military in which the political leader could influence or even control people's life. From this way the leader could get interests to himself and his party through making decisions to cheat to the public so they can not tell truth. Also the leader will keep the truth underboard for the sake of t protecting his famous when he have made some mistakes in some realms and lead negative influence. So if a leader refuse to tell the truth then there are maybe some unrevealed thing have happened.

In addition, if a politician could not hide any thing relevant to the truth then it is shown that he own a high moral and ethic stands. The leader, of cause in focus of public, may be a paradigm to public people for almost every aspects, it needs a more higher moral and ethic stands than average of public, only because that could people have reasons and confidence to trust a leader. If he lost reliance upon him, it means he have betrayed the people trust him.  To people, they can not believe a people who try to lie to them would lead them a better lives. So there is no reason for people to trust any more a leader who have told lies.

Although some politicians claim that they did not tell some truth is to prevent the influence leaded by it such as social argument, critics among mass media. But all these can not be alibis, to the contrary, these are significant characteristics for a democratic society and could make our social development well protected. The argument could make public to clarify the truth and figure out some means to resolve; the critics would draw some forces to the politicians so that they could learn the public is keeping an eye on them so they will make their decisions more careful and efficient. So the truth the politician told would let us have the chance to make us a better society.

“The truth is out there, so the lies,” as a famous line in X-files, we are still living in a society that is replete of cheating and lies. So only could a politician earn people’s trust and make his own works efficient if he share the truth with public, and finally, do contributions for a better democratic society.

nostrumUID: 2124189

As we all know and some movies or TV series reveal to us, the politic realm is a field that full of lies and cheats. So whether the honesty is useless or not, for a politician who want to be an effective leader? In my point of view, a political leader lost his quantity to be a leader at the just moment when he abandons his honesty quality. 题目讨论的是to tell the truth all the time, wx 这样规定基调有没有点走题的inclination? 因为是有所隐瞒，不是完全放弃诚实的作风呀
First and foremost, the honesty of political leader is required by a well developed society--------democratic society in which people own the right to know exactly what they want and express their points freely. The truth behind the politics are always revealed 这里是少一个by，还是什么意思？总之我不明白你想说啥are revealed +object? several realms such as economy, mass media, military in which the political leader could influence or even control people's life. From In this way the leader could get interests to himself and his party through making decisions to cheat to the public so they can not tell the truth. Also the leader will keep the truth underboard for the sake of protecting his famous when he have made some mistakes in some realms and lead cause negative influence. So if a leader refuses to tell the truth then there are maybe some unrevealed thing have happened.
本段感觉TS跟后面具体展开的内容关系很松散哦，按照常规思路，你的TS后面似乎要讨论honesty怎么样必须，但是讨论的却是leaders为什么有所隐瞒
In addition, if a politician could not hide any thing relevant to the truth then it is shown that he own a high moral and ethic stands. The leader, of cause in focus of public, may be a paradigm to public people for almost every aspects, it needs a more higher moral and ethic stands than average of public, only because that only with this virtue could people have reasons and confidence to trust a leader. If he lost reliance upon him, it means he have betrayed the people trust 两个V啦，改成people’s trust 去掉him him.  To people, they can not believe a people a people?一个民族？a person who try tried to lie to them would lead them a better lives. So there is no reason for people to trust any more a leader who have told lies.

Although some politicians claim that they did not tell some truth is to prevent the influence leaded by it such as social argument, critics among mass media. But all these can not be alibis, hoho~~~GRE词汇！ To on  the contrary, these are significant characteristics for a democratic society and could make our social development well protected. The argument could make public to clarify the truth and figure out some means to resolve; the critics would draw some forces to the politicians so that they could learn the public is keeping an eye on them so they will make their decisions more careful and efficient. So这一会儿，3个so啦 the truth the politician told would let us have the chance to make us a better society.

“The truth is out there, so the lies,” as a famous line in X-files, patpat 喜欢ing we are still living in a society that is replete of cheating and lies. So only could a politician earn people’s trust and make his own works efficient if he share the truth with public, so 和if 的内容是不是颠倒了呢？and finally, do contributions for a better democratic society.

大体一看，挺好的文章，但是仔细看看，问题就出来了
我觉得主要的问题在于思路没有放开，说得内容比较集中，所以文章显得没有层次
B1，leader要诚实，不诚实就是有不好的目的
B2, leader诚实才说明他有很高的道德水准，才是值得民众信赖的
B3, 民主社会的要求
自己看看是不是都是一个层面上的东西，没有从多个角度分析这个问题

作为已经没救的人，我对自己没有过高要求啦，但是你还有好久，可以好好斟酌下

跟你不讲客气滴，批评狠了也没什么，还有那么多天可以提高么，你要似想报仇也可以狠狠的打击我，但似我不怕:victory:

WWWXXX2UID: 2143598

这几天思路匮乏……
写出来的东西都像挤出来的……
还睡过……※