issue17 疾速末班车第二次作业

qiwei19852003UID: 2228793

----------题目----------
"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws." [05/38; 06/40]
有两种法律：公平的和不公平的。社会中的每个人都应该遵守公平的法律，更重要的是，不遵守或者违抗不公平的法律。
---------提纲----------
1 鉴别法律公平与否很难找到公认的标准.
2 法律维持着国家的正常运转, 不遵守或者违抗法律会造成社会的混乱, 即使是对不公平的法律.
3 对于不公平的法律公民要积极的通过立法机构对其进行修正.
----------正文-----------
Every part of the society is restrained by laws, with our prospect to a stable society. It is a grave false to disobey laws, even if the law is unjust to some people. In the long river of histroy, laws  always evolve to fit the development of human society. As the evolvement is a process varies from time to time, it is possible that there are some laws unjust and not a suitable to the current world.
It is hard to dentify unjust lows distinguished from just lows, since, considering from different angles, people often claim different conclusion. In this case, the law you believe unjust could be  included to the field of considerable just lows to another people. Indeed, is there a law, believed to be a just one satisfied by all of people in the nation. The answer is absolutely negative. The law to resist monopolization is likely unjust to Bill Gate and his corporation Microsoft. Like another enterprise, as a commercial miracle, Microsofe strive to gain more profits, and the monopolization is the result of hard work. The last result, depending on laws, is a split of the company. It is impossible for Bill Gate to disregard the adjudge and continue to monopolize the market, for the law is required to protect small companies.
Afterall, lows sustain the stability of the society, and social development is based on the stability. Thus, any reasons to disobey laws and inflence the stability is somehow unreasonable, even you consider the law is unjust. For example, in China, there is a law, one family could only have one child, and several people dissatisfy to it. Actually, Chinese, the most numerous people, need to alter the lasting increase of the amount of individuals. As we don’t have sufficient resource to supply too many new-born children, the law to limit the total number of people is necessary. The nation, as a whole, need that every inhabitant obeys laws, for the stability of the entire socity.
In actuality, inhabitants have reasonal access to change laws which people all believe it is unjust. Nation have the apartment to establish and emend lows. And it is a element right for citizens to participate the law’s improvment through the councilman people elect or by demonstrating in the street. If it tured out that most people neglect the unjust laws, this problem lead to another adversity to the nation. In the case of the laws lag, no progress will be in the country. What we need to do is, through legal way, trying to evolve the laws.  
No utter unjust laws exist in the world, wherever in ancient Athens, in 18th century France after revolution, or in morden America. But laws relative equal and just is enough to accomplish the develpoment of human. And to obey laws is a good manner. At the same time, the perfect laws will not be always in the air after continual improvement

liuwenqi24UID: 2141136

----------题目----------
"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws." [05/38; 06/40]
有两种法律：公平的和不公平的。社会中的每个人都应该遵守公平的法律，更重要的是，不遵守或者违抗不公平的法律。
---------提纲----------
1 鉴别法律公平与否很难找到公认的标准.
2 法律维持着国家的正常运转, 不遵守或者违抗法律会造成社会的混乱, 即使是对不公平的法律.
3 对于不公平的法律公民要积极的通过立法机构对其进行修正.
----------正文-----------
Every part of the society is restrained by laws, with our prospect to a stable society. It is a grave false to disobey laws, even if the law is unjust to some people. In the long river of histroy, laws  always evolve to fit the development of human society. As the evolvement(develop,注意小错误) is a process varies from time to time, it is possible that there are some laws unjust and not a suitable to the current world. (我觉得可以按照下文的论述顺序安排你的position啊,先讲难以判断,再讲,不管怎样都要遵守)

It is hard to dentify(identify) unjust lows distinguished from just lows, since, considering from different angles, people often claim different conclusion. In this case, the law you believe unjust could be  included to the field of considerable just lows to another people. Indeed, is there a law, believed to be a just one satisfied by all of people in the nation. The answer is absolutely negative. The law to resist monopolization is likely unjust to Bill Gates and his corporation Microsoft. Like another enterprise, as a commercial miracle, Microsofe strive to gain more profits, and the monopolization is the result of hard work. The last result, depending on laws, is a split of the company. It is impossible for Bill Gate to disregard the adjudge and continue to monopolize the market, for the law is required to protect small companies.(好例子呀)

Afterall, lows sustain the stability of the society, and social development is based on the stability. Thus, any reasons to disobey laws and inflence(?) the stability is somehow unreasonable, even you consider the law is unjust. For example, in China, there is a law, one family could only have one child, and several people dissatisfy(及物动词) to it. Actually, Chinese, the most numerous people, need to alter the lasting increase of the amount of individuals. As we don’t have sufficient resource to supply too many new-born children, the law to limit the total number of people is necessary. The nation, as a whole, need that every inhabitant obeys laws, for the stability of the entire socity.(可以讨论一下计划生育just or not的问题.不过,在老美看来,似乎计划生育涉及到了人权问题,不知道他们是啥看法...)

In actuality, inhabitants have reasonal access to change laws which people all believe it is unjust. Nation have the apartment to establish and emend lows. And it is a element right for citizens to participate the law’s improvment through the councilman people elect or by demonstrating in the street. If it tured out that most people neglect the unjust laws, this problem lead to another adversity to the nation. In the case of the laws lag, no progress will be in the country. What we need to do is, through legal way, trying to evolve the laws.  

No utter unjust laws exist in the world, wherever in ancient Athens, in 18th century France after revolution, or in morden America. But laws relative equal and just is enough to accomplish the develpoment of human. And to obey laws is a good manner. At the same time, the perfect laws will not be always in the air after continual improvement

有些qiwei 自己没有留意的拼写和语法的小问题.
逻辑不错,呵呵,继续加油