寄托天下
查看: 749|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue17 [0610G急速末班车小组]第二次作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
75
注册时间
2005-6-15
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2006-8-10 22:17:18 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
题目:ISSUE17 - "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
字数:451          用时:2:04:26          日期:2006-8-9

As is known, laws are one of the important foundations in our society for justice and safety. Meanwhile, laws stand for the power of the nation which protect the interests of the majority of its people. Therefore, from my point of view, no matter whether the laws are just or unjust, their authority should be respected definitely.

In our recent world, with the high complexity of the society, laws play a more and more significant role in protecting the social justice and human rights. Legal regulations effectively control the crimes to the individuals which may bring our society into instability. Therefore, if we permit some deeds which are forbidden by the laws, although  the laws may be somewhat unfair for some people, the authority and purity of our laws may be totally ruined. For example, in some nations, it is prohibitted by the laws to fish in some rivers in order to protect the natural balance, but it is obviously unjust for the fishermen, who live on fishing in the rivers. If they disobey and resist the laws, then the regulations will have no ristrictions. Maybe in a few years the river will be seriously wrecked and then ultimately influence the benifits of the fishermen and all the people living near the rivers. Justice is a concept for all the social members, not only for some groups or individuals. Hence once we draw a law, all the members should be restricted by it, which is the real  precondition of the social justice.

On the other hand, however, laws can also make serious mistakes, which may be caused by several wrong thinkings. For instance, in the past, some regions in the world might be influenced seriously by the racial discrimination and passed the laws with unjust rules to the minority. Even so, in my opinion, the settlement of the unjustice problem should be legit better than disobeying or resisting them. We can express our dissatisfaction and arguments concerning the laws, or we can organize great remonstration to the government which can influence the legislature to correct the unjust laws. In a jural world today, no one should be given the right to disobey the laws, but every one has the right to deliver his/her standpoint about the laws, or even fight against the unfair laws in legit ways, which I consider the most effective means to pursue the social justice.

Differing from the moral regulations, laws have much more holy station and more strict penalties. They offer us consistent standards for individual behaviors, which insure the security and justice of the society. Consequently, I approve using legit methods to solve the problems of unjust laws instead of disobeying or resisting unjust laws.

怎么展开写啊?感觉好像很难有话说,瞎扯又怕跑题了,sigh...超时这么多,痛苦。

[ 本帖最后由 jinyuliangyan27 于 2006-8-10 22:18 编辑 ]
—西飞雁
0 0

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue17 [0610G急速末班车小组]第二次作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue17 [0610G急速末班车小组]第二次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-511600-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部