Issue56 留链互拍!

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

ÌâÄ¿£ºISSUE 56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
×ÖÊý£º587          ÓÃʱ£º12:45:00 AM          ÈÕÆÚ£º9/8/2006

In daily life, there are always a lot of problems that need to be resolved, which contains both immediate problems of today and the anticipated problems of the future. That brings some confusion to the government that which of them should be superior to the other. As far as I am concerned, it depends on that which of them is the most serious one that must be solved first.

Many problems in daily life should be resolved in order to meet the immediate needs of people. Living with others in the same area, there are often disagreements in some matters that have concerned to people's interests, and always make them worry about it. To resolve that, we often want government to help us and make the immediate problems solved quickly. To avoid serious quarrels from occurring, the government should make new policy toward the area to unravel the problems. Also, government should greatly focus on the management of economics today. Like control on transporting sales to prevent cheat commotions from happening and in order to protect consumers' interests. Therefore, sometimes the government should focus on the immediate problems of today prior to problems in the future, as they will greatly affect our daily life.

However, some problems which may happen in the future and determined the destiny of our society should be give priority. For example, in 90's in China, population grows quickly. Seen from that trend, the population seems that it will grow to a large number which will bring many problems, like there will be very little space for people to live and lack of food will be provided, which will also make a lot of animals quickly die out. Government has assumed many problems which will be produced by that phenomenon, so policy on controlling the population is established to suppress the increases. It is right to give the priority to the problem, since if that will not be resolved quickly, the problems follow it will appear rapidly and much more. Just because it has been resolved, Chinese today live harmonious and happy instead of hardly make enough food or find enough space to live. Therefore, we can see that some anticipated problems of the future that will certainly greatly influence our society, should be paid enough focus on.

Finally, government should make a good balance of giving the priority to the immediate problems of today or the anticipated problems of the future. Government should first consider that which one is the most serious and focus on that one. For example, during the flooding period in some place of China, government makes full focus of it and stops any other matters referring to the future. Since in that period, to save people who are distressed in the flooding areas is the most important problem the government should resolve. While when meet the problems to investigate more money on education in order to cultivate excellent students for future need, the government has shifted some financial concerning the immediate problems to spend it on education. Seen from these examples, we can see that whether more focus should be paid, it depends on that whether the problem concerns more.

To sum up, government always meet various problems, and whether the immediate problems of today or the anticipated problems of the future should b e paid more focus, it depends on which of them is the most serious one. And government should try their best to make a good balance of these problems in order to make them resolved effectively.

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

好久没人给改文章了555

shenzhenhuaUID: 2241271

In daily life, there are always a lot of problems that need to be resolved, which contains both immediate problems of today and the anticipated problems of the future. That brings some confusion to the government(is) that which of them should be superior to the other. As far as I am concerned, it depends on that which of them is the most serious one that must be solved first.

Many problems in daily life should be resolved in order to meet the immediate needs of people. Living with others in the same area, there are often disagreements in some matters that have concerned to people's interests, and always make them worry about it. To resolve that, we often want government to help us and make the immediate problems solved quickly. To avoid serious quarrels from occurring, the government should make new policy toward the area to unravel the problems. Also, government should greatly focus on the management of economics today. Like control on transporting sales to prevent cheat commotions from happening and in order to protect consumers' interests. Therefore, sometimes the government should focus on the immediate problems of today prior to problems in the future, as they will greatly affect our daily life.

However, some problems which may happen in the future and determined(determine) the destiny of our society should be give(gave) priority. For example, in 90's in China, population grows quickly. Seen from that trend, the population seems that it will grow to a large number which will bring many problems, like there will be very little space for people to live and lack of food will be provided, which will also make a lot of animals quickly die out. Government has assumed many problems which will be produced by that phenomenon, so policy on controlling the population is established to suppress the increases. It is right to give the priority to the problem, since if that will not be resolved quickly, the problems follow it will appear rapidly and much more. Just because it has been resolved, Chinese today live harmonious and happy instead of hardly make enough food or find enough space to live. Therefore, we can see that some anticipated problems of the future that will certainly greatly influence our society, should be paid enough focus on.

Finally, government should make a good balance of giving the priority to the immediate problems of today or the anticipated problems of the future. Government should first consider that which one is the most serious and focus on that one. For example, during the flooding period in some place of China, government makes full focus of(on) it and stops any other matters referring to the future. Since in that period, to save people who are distressed in the flooding areas is the most important problem the government should resolve. While when meet the problems to investigate more money on education in order to cultivate excellent students for future need, the government has shifted some financial concerning the immediate problems to spend it on education. Seen from these examples, we can see that whether more focus should be paid, it depends on that whether the problem concerns more.

To sum up, government always meet various problems, and whether the immediate problems of today or the anticipated problems of the future should b e paid more focus, it depends on which of them is the most serious one. And government should try their best to make a good balance of these problems in order to make them resolved effectively.
我觉得你这篇文章的例子举得不是很好，不是很有说服力，特别在长远和短期上这些粒子没交待好
另外， 如果可能的话最好多举国外例子。
呵呵，祝你考试顺利........
我的argument220，你有时间就看一下吧
http://edu.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=526438&extra=page%3D1

[ 本帖最后由 shenzhenhua 于 2006-9-10 19:58 编辑 ]

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

如果能帮举举这样的例子就好了 实在想不出啊

seven_517UID: 2144863

TOPIC: ISSUE56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
WORDS: 526          TIME: 0:45:43          DATE: 2006-9-8

第二段：政府的本质，通常决定了一些领导人注重眼前利益，解决眼前问题

第三段：注重眼前问题的危害

第四段：现在做的事， 要为以后考虑

Should governments focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future, as the speaker claims? Admittedly, governments prefer to solve immediate problems for the reason that they can achieve these goals in the short-term, and it can also serve them in election and reelection events. However, as far as I am concerned, if governments pay much more attention and job on solving immediate problems rather than on anticipated problems, it will ultimately do disserve to the people, as well as to the society. While countless factors affect my attitude to this topic, there are three obvious aspects listed as follow.

The first reason for my argument has to with the nature of governments which are comprised of political leaders, legislators, bureaucrats and so forth. By virtue of their nature, they are more concerned with short-term and practical interests which can carry benefit for their election and reelection events. For example, some mayors, in their tenure, are far more concerned with such aspects as the rate of economic growth, and job growth, but less concerned with protecting environment, and other respects which will carry grave consequences for people as well as for the society in future. In short, in some cases governments have focused far more on solving the immediate problems of today than trying to solve the enduring, pressing and anticipated problems of the future.

However, few would dispute that focusing more on solving the immediate problems of today, and not on solving the anticipated problems of the future, has brought about grave consequences to people and to the society. For instance, in order to expand economy, governments allow companies freely to emit enfluences, which seriously pollute the environment as a result; in order to gain land that can be cultivated, governments allow clear-cutting the forests, which can set into motion a chain of species extinctions which ultimately endanger our humans as a species. In short, pursuing short-term interests and hastily solving the immediate problems of today, regardless of potential consequences it might brought about, often amount to a net loss for humanity and for society.

Furthermore, what is also worth noticing fact is that governments should be concerned with the future effects of the actions they take today. History informs us it will remember the person who contribute meaningfully to the enduring problems and anticipated problems of the future, rather than the person who "solve" the immediate problems which can be forgotten in a short time span. For example, history will remember Teddy Roosevelt who built the Panama Canal and National Park System which spawned great benefits for people as well as for the society in worldwide. Think about another opposite instance which is so call "Star Wars" defense initiative supported by Reagan Administration. Unfortunately, this project is proved to be ill-conceived and is a large waste of dollars that can be applied to addressing such anticipated problems of the future and other enduring problems.

In the final analysis, I strongly disagree with the speaker's statement that governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems rather than solving the anticipated problems of the future. On balance, it will provide disserve to the people and to the society.

ChunyanLi2005UID: 2124266

seven_517UID: 2144863

帮忙改改呀