- 最后登录
- 2007-1-23
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 202
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2006-11-2
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 174
- UID
- 2269470

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 202
- 注册时间
- 2006-11-2
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Issue36
The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
(这里没必要象中文一样空格,直接顶格写就行,每段结束后空一行)The speaker asserts that the greatness of individuals is decided not by their contemporaries but only by the descents. But in my opinion, the speaker’s view is right in some aspects such as the science, but has no significances in the area of arts and politics. We can discuss it one by one as follows.
[It is true when we refer to the field of science, there is no research whose benefits are immediate and predictable【什么意思?】, as we know, people often have skeptical attitude to the theory which is proved by the scientist, 【需要断开了吧,这里没必要再用逗号了】take the Thomas Edison, the American famous inventor who has more the 100 inventions, for example, his major inventions were designed and built in the last years of the Eighteen-Hundreds.][这一句要好好琢磨一下] However, most of them had their greatest effect in the Twentieth Century that has made possible the progress of technology【你是想说使技术进步成为可能吧,那改一下顺序是否会好一点the progress of technology possible】. 【An】 another powerful有力的【换cogent吧】 example is Bronu [whose claims did harm to the government of Roman religion was fires to death at Roman Ground, his opinion was recognized by offspring scientist several centuries later.] [whose claims did harm to the government of Roman religion. He was burn to death at Roman Ground, yet his opinion was recognized by offspring scientist several centuries later.] [So][换成from this degree of view吧,so感觉语气太重,因为科学领域里的talent也不是每一都是后人才能评价的啊,比如说中国的袁隆平,his contemporary不是也都认识到他的伟大之处了吗?] in the scientific area, most of the greatness of the individuals was decided by offspring for their opinion must be proved later that make people to believe。
By contrast, in the area of the arts, the greatness of the stars can be decided by the contemporaries immediately for they need not be confirmed,【前后句间没有连词啊,你这是两个句子,之间一定要有连词,不然就不能用,隔开,而要用;隔开】they can be judged at face value【这句不懂?】. Let’s look at Elvis Presley, [句间关系,Let’s look at Elvis Presley和后句he was so popular during his lifetime……之间没连词,修改办法:1.加连词2.修改句子结构,可以把前句改成一个状语regarding ……或taking ……for example] undisputed King of Rock and Roll, he was so popular during his lifetime that his popular records was [were] sold more than five-million copies in 1956. Also the famous writer-- Ernest Hemingway, whose novels was so fashionable in his early age that made him famous in Paris even all over the world and got the Nobel Prize for literature in his later life in 1954.[举例完了最好再有一点关于例子的论述]
In the realm of politics, the leader’s great achievement is recognizable immediately. The 【改成a吧,这里没有特指】 wonderful 【这里是否可以换一些词更贴切一点,比如说successful, perfect等】leader usually concerns about the people’s interests, improves the living standard, and even builds the social-welfare, all of which will benefit to their citizens so that they are 【跟句首单数不匹配了】 respected by their contemporaries. The new American’s first president—George Washington, the man who led American people to victory in their war for independence from Britain and kept the new nation united in the dangerous of its life, had a strange power over the American in his life time and even nowadays. His personality and influence were extremely important at the Philadelphia convention that wrote the new Constitution which was the new nation’s plan of government.
In conclusion, the speaker’s assert is too absolute that they overlook the great individuals particularly in the area of the arts and politics, however, it is true in the area of science for the theory might withstand centuries of rigorous scientific scrutiny.
内容:文章以领域来分伟人是否能被当今人或后人认识到有点不妥,因为在各个领域里都是既有被后人认识到的,也有被当今人认识到的,除非我们能证明在某领域一个比另一个多,但是这种证明仅仅凭借单纯的几个例子是很难说服人的。所以个人认为既然文章采取了折中的观点,那么就要分析一下什么情况下伟人能被当今人认识到,什么情况下又能被后人认识到(比如说当时的社会背景,伟人成果本身的性质,其实你在文章中都有提到,但是你首先是说各个领域有什么特点。其实我们知道在同一领域里,各个伟人的作品的性质也是不同的,以科学为例,偏理论的可能就不容易被当今人接受,而偏应用的则可以),而不是简单的分领域。
结构:文章结构很清晰,典型的三段式结构
语法:注意连词的使用,长句的应用也要注意 |
|