issue51 留链互拍

PrudenceUID: 2286952

TOPIC: ISSUE51 - "Education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student."
WORDS: 491          TIME: 0:57:35          DATE: 2007-3-31

Only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will education be truly effective? Concerning the purpose of education, I strongly disagree with the speaker's assertion.

To begin with, this foregoing question reminds us another one; that is, what is the purpose of education? Over this issue many people, including experts and ordinary people, carry out a drastic debate for centuries-some argue that the purpose of education is to meet societies' needs and give whatever knowledge societies need, regardless what students want to learn; some others' view point is that education is used to teach students how to support themselves; also some others ' opinion is to teach student rather how to think, than what to want to learn; rather to encourage them to find the potential abilities, than to teach the skills to earn money. In my view, education's purpose is to teach students how to think, and to form their own opinion towards world, life, and value. In that case, students in education should be passive ones-be taught how to perceive, and how to think. Thus, education assumes an active role to teach students, not is designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

Moreover, education's active role is understandable. Students, especially pupils, are more or less ignorant towards the out world, because they may be born as talented ones but know nothing at the very beginning. Thus, they need to be taught the basic knowledge, and to form the habit to think by themselves-of which both are essential to cultivate innovative and imaginable students. If we take a gem to do a comparison, the gem is a student and the education is a skillful person who is good at changing natural gems into beautiful ones. Even if the gem is wonderful, no skillful person exists to reshape it, and it would merely be a natural gem, with great value concealed.

Admittedly, successful education, at the same time, should be one that can adapt itself to the needs and the talents of students. If it fails to do so, just like a gem is destroyed completely, since the "skillful" person is only looks skillful and actually a bad one and does not follow the inborn features and characters of the gem to design and reshape it. When we show our pities to this gem, we should reflect that education should be a passive one too. Especially exceptionable students, if we compare them as gold covered, education is main task is to unearth them.

To sum up, favorable education should such one-on one hand gives students basic knowledge and teaches them how to think; on the other hand perceives what kinds students are and meet they demand and help themselves to make best use of their inborn talent. If the education cannot fulfill these, it would be a pure structure, and cannot make itself to be in accordance with its name.

唯美笑痴UID: 2275335

Only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will education be truly effective? Concerning the purpose of education, I strongly disagree with the speaker's assertion.

To begin with, this foregoing question reminds us another one; that is, what is the purpose of education? Over this issue many people, including experts and ordinary people（everyman,layfolk）, carry out a drastic debate for centuries-some argue that the purpose of education is to meet societies' needs and give whatever knowledge societies need, regardless what students want to learn(这句好生硬啊 thereby overlooking what students want to learn); some others' view point(到底用view还是point？去掉一个吧) is that education is used to teach students how to support themselves; also some others ' opinion is to teach student rather how to think, than what to want to learn（不知道你想说什么～汗）; rather to encourage them to find the potential abilities, than to teach the skills to earn money. In my view, education's purpose is to teach students how to think, and to form their own opinion towards world, life, and value. In that case, students in education should be passive ones-be taught how to perceive, and how to think. Thus, education assumes an active role to teach students, not is designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

Moreover, education's active role is understandable. Students, especially pupils, are more or less ignorant towards the out (real)world, because they may be born as talented ones but know nothing at the very beginning这句也看不懂，你想表达什么意思啊. Thus, they need to be taught the basic knowledge, and to form the habit to think by themselves-of which both are essential to cultivate innovative and imaginable students. If we take a gem to do a comparison, the gem is a student（，） and the education is a skillful person who is good at changing natural gems into beautiful ones. Even if the gem is wonderful, no skillful person exists to reshape it, and it would merely be a natural gem, with great value concealed.

Admittedly, successful education, at the same time, should be one that can adapt itself to the needs and the talents of students. If it fails to do so, just like a gem is destroyed completely, since the "skillful" person is only (加个somebody才正确)looks skillful and actually a bad one and does not follow the inborn features and characters of the gem to design and reshape it. When we show our pities to this gem, we should reflect that education should be a passive one too. Especially exceptionable students, if we compare them as gold covered, education is (写错了吧，改成's)main task is to unearth them.

To sum up, favorable education should （又漏了be）such one-on one hand gives students basic knowledge and teaches them how to think; on the other hand perceives what kinds students are and meet they demand and help themselves to make best use of their inborn talent. If the education cannot fulfill these, it would be a pure structure, and cannot make itself to be(把to be 去掉把) in accordance with its name.

唯美笑痴UID: 2275335

我的qq，415060225
希望多多交流
bu the way,那个宝石的比喻很不错
^_^

PrudenceUID: 2286952

Only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will education be truly effective? Concerning the purpose of education, I strongly disagree with the speaker's assertion.

To begin with, this foregoing question reminds us another one; that is, what is the purpose of education? Over this issue many people, including experts and everyman, carry out a drastic debate for centuries-some argue that the purpose of education is to meet societies' needs and give whatever knowledge societies need, regardless what students want to learn; some others' viewpoint is that education is used to teach students how to support themselves; also some others ' opinion is to teach student rather how to think, than what to learn; rather to encourage them to find the potential abilities, than to teach the skills to earn money. In my view, education's purpose is to teach students how to think, and to form their own opinion towards world, life, and value. In that case, students in education should be passive ones-be taught how to perceive, and how to think. Thus, education assumes an active role to teach students, not is designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

Moreover, education's active role is understandable. Students, especially pupils, are more or less ignorant towards the real world, because they may be born as talented ones but know nothing at the very beginning of their lives-innocent ones. Thus, they need to be taught the basic knowledge, and to form the habit to think by themselves-of which both are essential to cultivate innovative and imaginable students. If we take a gem to do a comparison, the gem is a student, and the education is a skillful person who is good at changing natural gems into beautiful ones. Even if the gem is wonderful, no skillful person exists to reshape it, and it would merely be a natural gem, with great value concealed.

Admittedly, successful education, at the same time, should be one that can adapt itself to the needs and the talents of students. If it fails to do so, just like a gem is destroyed completely, since the "skillful" person only looks skillful and actually is a bad one and does not follow the inborn features and characters of the gem to design and reshape it. When we show our pities to this gem, we should reflect that education should be a passive one too. Especially exceptional children, if we compare them as gold covered, education’s main task is to unearth them.

To sum up, favorable education should be such one-on one hand gives students basic knowledge and teaches them how to think; on the other hand perceives what kinds of students are and meet they demand and help themselves to make best use of their inborn talent. If the education cannot fulfill these, it would be a pure structure, and cannot make itself in accordance with its name.

eddie23508okUID: 2281260

Only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student, will education be truly effective? Concerning the purpose of education, I strongly disagree with the speaker's assertion.(建议第一段可以写得稍微再详细点，也不失为一个凑字数的好方法)

To begin with, this foregoing question reminds us another one; （是不是应该用逗号？）that is, what is the purpose of education? Over this issue many people, including experts and ordinary people, carry out a drastic debate for centuries-some argue that the purpose of education is to meet societies' needs and give whatever knowledge societies need, regardless what students want to learn; some（Some） others' view point is that education is used to teach students how to support themselves; also(Also) some others ' (用other就好了)opinion is to teach student rather how to think, than what to want to learn（有点拗口，建议可改为...to teach students how to think rather than what to learn）; rather to encourage them to find the potential abilities, than to teach the skills to earn money.(to encourage them to find the potential abilities rather than how to make money) In my view, education's purpose is to teach students how to think, and to form their own opinion towards (用about是不是更好)world（应该加定冠词the）, life, and value. In that case, students in education should be passive ones-be taught how to perceive, and how to think. Thus, education assumes an active role to teach students, not is designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student.

Moreover, education's active role(education是无生命的东西，表示所有格不能用"...'s"，应该用...of...) is understandable. Students, especially pupils, are more or less ignorant towards the out(outer) world, because they may be born as talented ones but know nothing at the very beginning. Thus, they need to be taught the basic knowledge, and to form the habit to think by themselves-of which both are essential to cultivate innovative and imaginable(imaginable是富于想象力的意思吗？) students. If we take a gem to do a comparison, the gem is a student and the education is a skillful person who is good at changing natural gems into beautiful ones. Even if the gem is wonderful, no skillful person exists to reshape it, and it would merely be a natural gem, with great value concealed.

Admittedly, successful education, at the same time, should be one that can adapt itself to the needs and the talents of students. If it fails to do so, just like a gem is destroyed completely, since (since在这什么意思？)the "skillful" person is (不用is,再加上just)only looks skillful and （is）actually a bad one and does not follow the inborn features and characters of the gem to design and reshape it. When we show our pities to this gem, we should reflect that education should be a passive one too. Especially exceptionable students, if we compare them as gold covered, education is main task is to unearth them.

To sum up, favorable education should such one-on one hand gives students basic knowledge and teaches them how to think; on the other hand perceives what kinds students are and meet they demand and help themselves to make best use of their inborn talent. If the education cannot fulfill these, it would be a pure structure, and cannot make itself to be in accordance with its name.

貌似强烈反对的感觉没有表达出来，另外在句子上觉得要更纯粹些，用英语去思考，而不是建立在中文上的英语。加油！！