Issue17【0710G Victors互助小组】第5次作业

fengyinyangUID: 2321139

The speaker makes an assertion that every individual in society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. It's tempting because obeying the just laws is relevant to the security and stabilization of the society while disobeying the unjust laws is beneficial for the rights and interests of citizens. However, the arguer just overlooks the complication of laws and is partially correct for following reasons.

To begin with, admittedly, in order to accomplish the wish of the just law aimed at a harmonious society, we have to obey them. When we talk about the justice, we tend to focus on the human rights. However, without the obedience to the just laws, the society will result in chaos and anarchy and say nothing of other human rights. Just laws are the guarantee and base to the well-balanced operation of a nation and people's daily life. Moreover, whether laws are just and well carried out is a good reflection of the democracy in a country. Therefore, obeying the just laws is significant to maintain the stabilization of the society.

In the second place, the laws can not be always just and, in some certain situations; the laws which may be harmful can benefit the society. In such situation, the sacrifice of a person is obvious unjust for him, but, compared with the whole society, it's his obligation to obey the laws. In addition, the justice of one aspect will lead to the disorder of another field. For example, the regulation of restricting pollution emission is designed mainly to protect the health of populace. However, after the Industrial Revolution, nearly all the behaviors of human-being would, to some degree, contaminate the environment. If we obey such a law, the lives of people will return to primeval times. Consequently, we have to take the entire situation into account before we obey the laws

Finally, as the development of society and people's ideology, the criterion of justice differs a lot from what it used to be. Some just laws may be unjust after several years. Therefore, undue obedience to the banal laws would be an big obstacle to the process of the democracy in the nation. For laws also call for the evolution to consummate, the resistion will impulse it to be more humanity.

In sum, it’s hard, but worthy, for individuals to take up responsibility to resist unjust laws by proper means. It is also the responsibility of authorities to consider the validation of laws and make modifications accordingly. Only when both parts play active roles will the laws become beneficial for both the individual and the whole society

#十指飞舞UID: 2330769

The speaker makes an assertion that every individual in society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. It's tempting because obeying the just laws is relevant to the security and stabilization of the society while disobeying the unjust laws is beneficial for the rights and interests of citizens. However, the arguer just overlooks the complication of laws and is partially correct for following reasons.[原题目的观点是要遵守just laws and resist unjust laws。从全文来看，是赞成要just laws 和resist unjust laws，应该说是与题目一致的。何以需要however?]

To begin with, admittedly, in order to accomplish the wish of the just law aimed at a harmonious society, we have to obey them. When we talk about the justice, we tend to focus on the human rights. However,[这里的语气应是假设,非强烈转折]without the obedience to the just laws, the society will result in chaos and anarchy and say nothing of other human rights. Just laws are the guarantee and base to the well-balanced operation of a nation and people's daily life. Moreover, whether laws are just and well carried out is a good reflection of the democracy in a country. Therefore, obeying the just laws is significant to maintain[in maintaining]the stabilization of the society.

In the second place, the laws can not be always just and, in some certain situations; the laws which may be harmful can benefit the society. In such situation, the sacrifice of a person is obvious unjust for him, but, compared with the whole society, it's his obligation to obey the laws. In addition, the justice of one aspect will lead to the disorder of another field. For example, the regulation of restricting pollution emission is designed mainly to protect the health of populace. However, after the Industrial Revolution, nearly all the behaviors of human-being would, to some degree, contaminate the environment. If we obey such a law, the lives of people will return to primeval times. Consequently, we have to take the entire situation into account before we obey the laws.[这一段看完后感觉不到位，而且与我们的常识相违背，建议语气不要太绝对]

Finally, as the development of society and people's ideology, the criterion of justice differs a lot from what it used to be. Some just laws may be unjust after several years. Therefore, undue obedience to the banal laws would be an big obstacle to the process of the democracy in the nation. For laws also call for the evolution to consummate, the resistion[n.?] will impulse it to be more humanity[n.?].

In sum, it’s hard, but worthy, for individuals to take up responsibility to resist unjust laws by proper means［这里看全文的观点是要倡议读者resist unjust laws的］. It is also the responsibility of authorities to consider the validation of laws and make modifications accordingly. Only when both parts play active roles will the laws become beneficial for both the individual and the whole society


从全文来看，语句基本比较通顺
大部分论证的不错，
部分逻辑稍显乱了