issue177 [0710G 戴三个表冲刺小组] 第4次作业

pinuoUID: 2328081

    177 "The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but  with different eyes."
   
    提纲：
    1.同意，自身的知识能影响我们对外部世界的认识。
    2.人们有一种Tendency，对于有一定只是了解的领域会更感兴趣，应用自己的学习知识来对外界进行解释
    3.学到的知识会改变我们对外界的看法，做法。原来认为不好的，不能理解的，现在可以理解，原来理解比较局限的随着知识的增加，会理解比较全面。
      Example，学习理工科，会使我们的思维更有逻辑性，想问题更周全。学习程序开发，会形成一种安流程做事的习惯，看待外面的世界都是安顺序进行。
               学机械的人，更容易用系统的眼光看待问题，认为每个人，每个部门都是社会的一个零件。
               一个很不注意卫生习惯的人，当学习医学以后，就会变得注意卫生。
   
    TOPIC: ISSUE177 - "The study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. After studying the discipline, we see the same world as before, but with different eyes."

WORDS: 542          TIME: 01:00:00          DATE: 2007-7-29 17:49:11

The speaker asserts that the study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. I strongly agree with the assertion. And the further assertion that we see the same world as before with different eyes after studying the discipline seems even true after anaylize several different academic area.

First, the way we we perceive the world are greatly affuenced by our education backgroud, our experience in the field. People have such a tendency that they are more interested in the area they are relatively familar with than the other areas, thus know even more about it. And like to interprete the world with what they have learned or what they have experienced. When four people stand before a tree, the carpenter's interest is whether it can be used to make a nice table;  the zhiwuxuejia is try to make clear which category this tree likely fall into; the poet is greatly attracted by the atmosphere it construct in the surrendings; the pinter just think of bringing it into his cavans. Looking at the same object, different professional backgroud render them the totally different understanding.

Moreover, compared with our own initial impression of the same object, we may get the far different  understanding after studying the discipline. When we were young, the parents always told us how important it is to form the good custom in life, one very small thing--wash hands befor dinners. we still cannot do it very even under the repeated criticis, regard it as a small thing untill one day the teacher told us how danger it is to use the dirty hands, even looks clean, to touch food, the gem in our hands will be eaten with the food. What the teacher told at class  remind us to wash hands before dinner more effectively than the criticise from parents.

Concider the students who study science highly likely to do things with more logic and ananylize, but less imagination compared with their counterparts who art or liture. the one whose major is software design prefer to do all the things according to certain strict process. What is the first thing supposed to be the most urgent and what to do then, and what is prerequisite of certain action, that is to say whether  this action can be performed well depend on whether its conditions are satisfied. Also there shoud be concideration of certain relolustion to the exceptions arised beyond our antisipation. All the same as the design of software process. And the students whose major is machnics like to compare the whole sociaty as a big machine. The organiztions, the groups, even the individuals in the sociaty are regared as the parts of the machine accordingly. Whether the machine can work well closely relies on the performance of every parts. In short, we are customed to use what we have learned to  help us perceive the world we don't know.

In sum, the way we percive the world is a reflection of what we have learned. Different knowledge backgroud will draw the totally different conclution to same object. The more we learned, the more comprehensive understanding we are likely to get. Thus lool at the same thing at different angle will help us observation more objectively.

pinuoUID: 2328081

The speaker asserts that the study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. I strongly agree with the assertion. And the further assertion that we see the same world as before with different eyes after studying the discipline seems even true after anaylize(analyzing) several different academic area.

First, the way we perceive the world is greatly influenced by our education background, our experience in the field. People have such a tendency that they are more interested in the area they are relatively familiar with than the other areas, thus know even more about it. And like to interpret the world with what they have learned or what they have experienced. When four people stand before a tree, the carpenter's interest is whether it can be used to make a good table; the zhiwuxuejia(botanist) is trying to make clear which category this tree likely fall into; the poet is greatly attracted by its leafs and flowers as well as the meaning they conveyed to the observers; the painter just think of bringing it into his canvas. Looking at the same object, different professional backgrounds render them get totally different observation results.

Moreover, compared with our own initial impression of the same object, we may get(build 还是form呢，比get好) the far different understanding after studying the discipline. When we were young, the parents always told us how important it is to form the good custom in life, such as one very small thing--wash hands before dinners. We still cannot do it very well even under the repeated criticism, and regard it as a small thing until one day the teacher told us how danger it is to use the dirty hands, even looks clean, to touch foods, for the gem in our hands will be eaten with the food. What the teacher told at class remind us to wash hands before dinner more effectively than the criticisms from parents.

Consider the students who study science highly likely to do things with more logic and analysis, but less imagination compared with their counterparts who art or literature. The one whose major is software design prefer to do all the things according to certain strict process. What is the first thing supposed to be the most urgent, and what to do then, and what is prerequisite of certain action, that is to say whether this action can be performed well depend on whether its conditions are satisfied. Also there should be consideration of certain resolution to the exceptions arising beyond our anticipation. The design of software process is completely applied to life(应用到生活可以这样说吗？). And the students whose major is mechanics like to compare the whole society as a big machine. The organizations, the groups, even the individuals in the society are regarded as the parts of the machine accordingly. Whether the machine can work well closely relies on the performance of every part. In short, we are accustomed to use what we have learned to help us perceive the world we don't know.
In sum, the way we perceive the world is a reflection of what we have learned. Different knowledge background will draw the totally different conclusion to same object. The more we learned, the more comprehensive understanding we are likely to get. Thus observe the same thing at different angle will help us learn more objectively.

还是麻烦大家多拍拍，我只是修正了拼写错误，太不深刻了。

[ 本帖最后由 pinuo 于 2007-7-30 01:01 编辑 ]

scorpioccUID: 2328705

你的思路还是挺好的， 我是一点思路没有，开始也是AGREE但是找不到什么论点。而后想着这样写，学术学习不仅改变了我们观察世界的角度，也改变了我们改造世界的方法和程度，并且发明了很多自然界不存在的东西。但是感觉也不是很爽。看了你的不同学术背景对世界有不同的观察角度很受启发。

pinuoUID: 2328081

The speaker asserts that the study of an academic discipline alters the way we perceive the world. I strongly agree with the assertion. And the further assertion that we see the same world as before with different eyes after studying the discipline seems even true after analyzing several different academic areas.

First, the way we perceive the world is greatly influenced by our education background and our experience in the field. People have such a tendency that they are more interested in the area they are relatively familiar with than the other areas, thus know even more about it, and like to interpret the world with what they have learned or what they have experienced. Suppose four people with different career and educational background stand before a tree, the carpenter's interest is whether it can be used to make a nice table（a piece of furniture）; the botanist is trying to make clear which category this tree likely fall into; the poet is greatly attracted by the atmosphere it construct by the its flowers and leafs; the painter just think of bringing it into his canvas. Looking at the same object, different professional backgrounds render them the totally different understanding.

Moreover, compared with our own initial impression of the same object, we may get the far different understanding after studying the discipline. When we were young, the parents always told us how important it is to form the good custom in life, one very small thing--wash hands before dinners, seems so hard for us even under the repeated criticism. We had regarded it as a small thing until one day the teacher told us how danger it is to use the dirty hands, even looks clean, to touch food, because the gem (bacteria) in our hands will be eaten with the food. What the teacher told at class remind us to wash hands before dinner more effectively than criticism from parents.

Consider the students who study science highly likely to do things with more logic and analysis, but less imagination compared with their counterparts who learn art or literature. For instance, the one whose major is software design prefer to do all the things according to certain strict process. What is the first thing supposed to be the most urgent and what to do then, and what is prerequisite of certain action, that is to say whether this action can be performed well depend on whether its conditions are satisfied. Also there should be consideration of certain resolution to the exceptions arise beyond our anticipation. All the same as the design of software process. While the students whose major is mechanics like to compare the whole society to a big machine. The organizations, the groups, even the individuals in the society are regarded as the parts of the machine accordingly. Whether the machine can work well closely relies on the performance of every part. In short, we are accustomed to use what we have learned to help us perceive the world we don't know.

In sum, the way we perceive the world is a reflection of what we have learned, thus different knowledge background will draw the totally different conclusion to same object. The more we learned, the more comprehensive understanding we are likely to get, so looking at the same thing at different angle will help us observation more objectively.

[ 本帖最后由 pinuo 于 2007-8-14 22:35 编辑 ]

forwenUID: 2323132

学到很多，楼主思路很好啊