- 最后登录
- 2011-7-20
- 在线时间
- 41 小时
- 寄托币
- 715
- 声望
- 5
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-6
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 533
- UID
- 2359406
![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif) ![Rank: 3](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level1.gif)
- 声望
- 5
- 寄托币
- 715
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
TOPIC: ISSUE185 - "Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other areas-can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."
WORDS: 526 TIME: 上午 12:45:00 DATE: 2007-8-9
As the society develops, mediums, such as newspaper, internet, and magazines ,supplies us enormous information in which scandals are also included . would scandals be beneficial to our society? the arguer claims so ,however ,although I concede scandals carries some benefits ,for the most part , it could also pose detrimental effects on the public.
First of all , scandal serves no benefits in facilitating to establish societal models, which could play an important role in giving encourages and aims to the public in certain aspects .when it comes to the entertainers ,a typical example goes that :Jackson ,who was regarded as the king of dancer ,was once welcome worldwide , many adolescents were moved when they knew that Jackson had to exercise more then 15 hours everyday before he got knew . then they treated him as their model and learned from him :when they faced hardships in their career , they would overcome the infirmities by diligence and efforts ,like Jackson did . however , a shocking news would change their minds . Jackson was found to engage in some sex activities with a teenage .although Jackson still was that one who treated work seriously, yet people would never learn from a person who is abnormal, no matter how excellent he is . in this situation ,thus I concede that Jackson has problems with his private life ,his positive effects towards society were abandoned by the public simultaneously because of scandal .
Secondly ,most scandals are not meaningful but replete with boring personal privacy. it not only wastes society resource, like journalists and money for issuing scandals ,but also cost the time and money of people via taking use of their curious psychology while these resources could be allocated to other aspects which could make more sense ,like charity , to universities and so on .
Admittedly , scandals carries some benefits in the role of caveat .because scandal usually could be widespread via many accesses nowadays , it could convey this kind of information to the person who suffers from the same problems with the ones in scandal: if you act in the way like this person ,then no matter how famous you are ,how powerful you are ,the only result could be like him- accused and abandoned by the society . to illustrate this point ,we need look no further than Bill Clinton ,because his sexual scandal with Lewinsky , his presidency came to the end , although the rise of America economy was attribute to his wisdom leadership . it surely could give a caveat to the following presidents and other officers that regardless of your achievements and positions ,once you violate the basic moral principles of the society,then it means your career will come to an end .in this case ,scandal could pose a positive effect to society as a caveat.
In conclusion , although scandals have some merits as a caveat ,it always waste the resources of society and cost our time and money ,so we should be wary of the negative effects and try to avoid it by limiting the publication of meaningless scandals and guild the public to treat famous people more comprehensively . ,in addition ,take use of its advantages as a caveat .
大家随便拍吧 这是我最真实的水平 |
|