issue5|0806G-AW小组|第1次作业

mztnlUID: 2441079

i5

Words:552

A nation should to have standardization control on its basic education before university. It means let the primary and secondary school students have s series of national curriculums which determined by the Ministry of National Education.

On one hand, This will be conducive to the exchange between people who are belong to one country but different regions. When people from different places have already learned something the same, they would have a more comprehensive knowledge structure than who just learned things about where they live in. In another word, people who accepted same national curriculums must have a intersection of knowledge. So in this way, people do not have to worry about the exchange problems which brings on by geographical variations. Becouse they can find the  communication methods from the national courses they’ve learned when they were young. But if there is not any national courses at all, people's thinking will likely long-term limited in the environment around them instead of imagine what the lives are out of their daily life. Then understand others or conmunicate with others would be really hard.

On the other hand, make some provisions about public curriculums by the State also helps the schools which throughout the country to protect and improve the standard of teaching. Maybe it is good to allow schools to determine which academic courses to offer for the schools which have excellent teachers and good teaching standards. With this freedom, they can fully integrate the actual situation to explore the ability of children. But for the schools which did not have enough good teacher or any other teaching conditions, this “freedom” is really a big problem. Because the school’s lever decides the education level it can provide. The more “freedom”, the more they overwhelmed. So a nation need to make a seris of national courses. It is not only to standardize what the students should learn, but also helpful on showing and supervising how schools are practise their education. And this would make children who grown up in different environmen are more likely to receive the same quality of basic education.

And for a further consideration, provide national courses may have a great active role on the whole nation’s long-term stability. Study the same curriculum would let the citizens have a deep cultural identity and sense of belonging to their own country and the nation. This will be conducive to the people who come from different places but belong to the same nation to have a better communication and deeper understanding. People’s Self-identity and pursuit to the same caltrue make them more unitied and more willing to help each other. Otherwise, I mean let different area determine what their shcools to teach, peole might only agree with their own region’s culture, only think about their own region’s interests. In this way, the nation is easily to be split up. So in a long-term thinking, plan some national curriculums is good to enhance the national cohesion of citizens.

So in sum, it is necessary and great for a nation to set up a series of basic national compulsory for primary and secondary education. Because of three benefits—-to improve childrens’ own structure of knowledge, to develop the education lever of different schools, and the most important, to enhance the unity of the whole nation.

EmeraldUID: 2238409

A nation should to have standardization control on its basic education before university(感觉这句话说得有问题，before university总感觉不对）. It means let the primary and secondary school students have s series of national curriculums which determined (换成制定之类的词会不会好一点？不过我没想到什么词）by the Ministry of National Education.

On one hand, This will be conducive to the exchange between people who are belong to one country but different regions. When people from different places have already learned something the same, they would have a more comprehensive knowledge structure than who just learned things about where they live in（不一定会有更广的知识结构吧，而是不同地区的人的具有相同或者近似的知识结构. 同时，只学自己地区的东西也不一定不会有很广的知识结构。我感觉重点应该是统一教育课程给人们带来的知识上的同一性）In another word, people who accepted same national curriculums must have a intersection of knowledge. So in this way, people do not have to worry about the exchange problems which brings on by geographical variations. Becouse they can find the communication methods ？？from the national courses they’ve learned when they were young. But if there is not any national courses at all, people's thinking will likely long-term limited in the environment around them instead of imagine what the lives are out of their daily life. Then understand others or conmunicate with others would be really hard.（感觉这段写得比较混乱，前半部分写同一的课程会让彼此之间交往的更容易，但是后面写得是如果没有统一课程，人们会被局限在自己所生活的小空间里面， 感觉不太对）

On the other hand, make some provisions about public curriculums by the State also helps the schools which throughout the country to protect and improve the standard of teaching. Maybe it is good to allow schools to determine which academic courses to offer for the schools which have excellent teachers and good teaching standards. With this freedom, they can fully integrate the actual situation to explore the ability of children. But for the schools which did not have enough good teacher or any other teaching conditions, this “freedom” is really a big problem. Because the school’s lever (level?)decides the education level it can provide. The more “freedom”, the more they overwhelmed. (这个观点应该进一步的阐述，举出一些可能的情况会好一点）So a nation need to make a seris of national courses. It is not only to standardize what the students should learn, but also helpful on showing and supervising how schools are practise their education. And this would make children who grown up in different environmen are more likely to receive the same quality of basic education.（我觉得这里有个总结确实不错，比较呼应吧）

And for a further consideration, provide national courses may have a great active role on the whole nation’s long-term stability. Study the same curriculum would let the citizens have a deep cultural identity and sense of belonging to their own country and the nation. This will be conducive to the people who come from different places but belong to the same nation to have a better communication and deeper understanding. （这里的观点和前面的那个communication method是不是重复了？）People’s Self-identity and pursuit to the same caltrue make them more unitied and more willing to help each other. Otherwise, I mean let different area determine what their shcools to teach, peole might only agree with their own region’s culture, only think about their own region’s interests. In this way, the nation is easily to be split up. （但是也可以传承各个地区的文化，如果同一课程，是不是会对地区文化产生冲击？在考虑到这点的情况下再反驳会不会更有说服力？）So in a long-term thinking, plan some national curriculums is good to enhance the national cohesion of citizens.

So in sum, it is necessary and great for a nation to set up a series of basic national compulsory for primary and secondary education. Because of three benefits—-to improve childrens’ own structure of knowledge, to develop the education lever of different schools, and the most important, to enhance the unity of the whole nation.