Spring city小组第一次作业

linkccUID: 2413074

issue 144

Do the artist or the critic gives society something of lasting value? The speaker claimed only the artists can truly inoculate people with the true lasting value of art. It is true that the artists have a imponderable influence in the history of art, but in my opinion the influence of the critics also cannot be neglected.

Admittedly, scarcely no value achievement of art disengaged from the artists. The artists who full of creative thoughts usually pay more attention to the detail of world than normal people .Their works fully embody the state of contemporary society; open a door of evaluating the value of what the artists concerning about. For example a historian who studies the period of Renaissance not only indeed do some research of the productions of the time but also delve the creatures of these productions. Few can argue that if there were no da Vinci, there would be no "Mona lisa". If Vinci did not characterize this painting, people would not appreciate the mysterious smile.

When come it to the lasting value of art, however, the value achievement of art also associate with the critics. First, appreciating a famous artwork, normal people usually only notice the ostensible feature of the work; impossibly find out the content the creator truly wanted to present. Critics trained by specific skills, with particular visual angle, could comprehend the thought of creator and the value of the work. It is important to led critic to lead people enter into the gate of art of lasting value. The paintings of impression of Van Gogh did not receive any contemporary appreciation and comprehension, but have a great value nowadays. If not the critic rightly evaluate his work then until now people still consider the paintings of Van Gogh as a doodle and there not could be a painting auctioned by millions of dollar.

Second, nowadays there are many movies books and other works. The lasting value of art needs accord with the virtue. For example It is necessary for critic to criticize a work which misguide people filled with discrimination of racialism and militarism. A world with out critic must change into a mean world which only conserver something ribald and discard something of lasting value. A critic sometimes impeded the progress of art .As for critic, constrained by the situation which he live, he will not fairly evaluate the value of art and for satisfying the need of people. The true value of art will be ignored.

In sum, without the artist, no creature can be opened by people. Without the critic, no true value of art can be rightly appreciated by people. Thus while forming something of lasting value artists are equally important to the critics. Artists tell people where the value of art is, and critics tell people how to enter the value of art.

Scofield_thuUID: 2447386

Does the artist or the critic gives society somethingof lasting value? The speaker claimed only the artists can trulyinoculate people with(灌输贬义词吧，而且不需要用这么大而不熟悉的词) the true lasting value of art. It is true thatthe artists have a imponderable（这个词也很少用，希望你不是查汉英字典找到的） influence in the history of art, but inmy opinion the influence of the critics also cannot be neglected.

Admittedly, scarcely no （双重否定？）value achievement of art disengaged from theartists.（这句一个双重否定，一个disengeaged就把人搞糊涂了） The artists who are full of creative thoughts usually pay moreattention to the detail of world than normal people .Their works fullyembody the state of contemporary society; Open a door of evaluating thevalue of what the artists concerning about. (这局和上下文没什么关系吧)For example a historian whostudies the period of Renaissance not only indeed do some research ooducf（？？）the prtions （？？）of the time but also delve the creatures of theseproductions. Few can argue （用deny更好）that if there were no Da Vinci, there wouldbe no "Mona lisa". If Vinci did not characterize (这个动词用的太汉语话了)this painting, peoplewould not appreciate the mysterious smile.

When come it to the lasting value of art, however, the valueachievement of art also associate with the critics. First, appreciatinga famous artwork, normal people usually only notice the ostensiblefeature of the work; impossibly find out the content the creator trulywanted to present. Critics trained by specific skills, with particularvisual angle, could comprehend the thought of creator and the value ofthe work. It is important to led critic to lead people enter into thegate of art of lasting value. The paintings of impression of Van Goghdid not receive any contemporary appreciation and comprehension, buthave a great value nowadays. If not the critic rightly evaluate hiswork then until now people still consider the paintings of Van Gogh asa doodle and there not could be a painting auctioned by millions ofdollar.

Second, nowadays there are many movies books and other works. Thelasting value of art needs accord with the virtue. For example It isnecessary for critic to criticize a work which misguide people filledwith discrimination of racialism and militarism. A world with outcritic must change into a mean world which only conserver somethingribald and discard something of lasting value. A critic sometimesimpeded the progress of art .As for critic, constrained by thesituation which he live, he will not fairly evaluate the value of artand for satisfying the need of people. The true value of art will beignored.

In sum, without the artist, no creature can be opened by people.（没有生物会被人类们打开？不知所云）Without the critic, no true value of art can be rightly appreciated bypeople. Thus while forming something of lasting value artists areequally important to the critics. Artists tell people where the valueof art is, and critics tell people how to enter the value of art（进入价值？又是一句汉语思维的英语，用appreciate or enjoy多好）.

没有看完，总的感觉是汉语思维影响英文写作。估计是先汉语想好，然后在翻字典。如果要有改观必须用自己所熟悉的英文语言来书写，来表达。一点点来，哪怕写的不多，但总归是自己的英文思维