ISSUE144 JET小组第六次作业

linkccUID: 2413074

Do the artist or the critic gives society something of lasting value? The speaker claimed only the artists can truly inoculate people with the true lasting value of art. It is true that the artists have a imponderable influence in the history of art, but in my opinion the influence of the critics also cannot be neglected.

Admittedly, scarcely no value achievement of art disengaged from the artists. The artists who full of creative thoughts usually pay more attention to the detail of world than normal people .Their works fully embody the state of contemporary society; open a door of evaluating the value of what the artists concerning about. For example a historian who studies the period of Renaissance not only indeed do some research of the productions of the time but also delve the creatures of these productions. Few can argue that if there were no da Vinci, there would be no "Mona lisa". If Vinci did not characterize this painting, people would not appreciate the mysterious smile.

When come it to the lasting value of art, however, the value achievement of art also associate with the critics. First, appreciating a famous artwork, normal people usually only notice the ostensible feature of the work; impossibly find out the content the creator truly wanted to present. Critics trained by specific skills, with particular visual angle, could comprehend the thought of creator and the value of the work. It is important to led critic to lead people enter into the gate of art of lasting value. The paintings of impression of Van Gogh did not receive any contemporary appreciation and comprehension, but have a great value nowadays. If not the critic rightly evaluate his work then until now people still consider the paintings of Van Gogh as a doodle and there not could be a painting auctioned by millions of dollar.

Second, nowadays there are many movies books and other works. The lasting value of art needs accord with the virtue. For example It is necessary for critic to criticize a work which misguide people filled with discrimination of racialism and militarism. A world with out critic must change into a mean world which only conserver something ribald and discard something of lasting value. A critic sometimes impeded the progress of art .As for critic, constrained by the situation which he live, he will not fairly evaluate the value of art and for satisfying the need of people. The true value of art will be ignored.

In sum, without the artist, no creature can be opened by people. Without the critic, no true value of art can be rightly appreciated by people. Thus while forming something of lasting value artists are equally important to the critics. Artists tell people where the value of art is, and critics tell people how to enter the value of art.

月亮熬的汤UID: 2382325

Do the artist or the critic gives society something of lasting value? The speaker claimed （that）only the artists can truly inoculate people with the true lasting value of art. It is true that the artists have a imponderable(没用过这个单词，挺好) influence in(on) the history of art, but in my opinion the influence of the critics also cannot be neglected.

Admittedly, scarcely no value(valuable) achievement of art disengaged(是否应该用过去时态？) from the artists. The artists who full of（缺动词，建议改成is rich in） creative thoughts usually pay more attention to the detail of world than normal people .Their works fully embody the state of contemporary society; open a door of evaluating the value of what the artists （缺动词，加are）concerning about. For example a historian who studies the period of Renaissance not only indeed do some research of the productions of the time but also delve the creatures of these productions（这句话想表达的意识是很好很适合的，但是没表达太清楚）. Few can argue that（句型挺好） if there were no da Vinci, there would be no "Mona lisa". If Vinci did not characterize this painting, people would not appreciate the mysterious smile.

When come it to（When it comes to） the lasting value of art, however, the value achievement of art also associate with the critics. First, appreciating a famous artwork, normal people usually only notice the ostensible feature of the work; impossibly find out the content the creator truly wanted to present. Critics trained by specific skills, with particular visual angle, could comprehend the thought of creator and the value of the work. It is important to led critic to lead people enter into the gate of art of lasting value.（It is important that critic lead people into the gate of art of lasting value.这样句子似乎通顺些） The paintings of impression of Van Gogh did not receive any contemporary appreciation and comprehension, but have a great value nowadays. If not the critic rightly evaluate his work then until now people still consider the paintings of Van Gogh as a doodle and there not could be a painting auctioned by millions of dollar.

Second, nowadays there are many movies books and other works. The lasting value of art needs accord with the virtue. For example It is necessary for critic to criticize a work which misguide people filled with discrimination of racialism and militarism. A world with out critic must change into a mean world which only conserver something ribald and discard something of lasting value. A critic sometimes impeded the progress of art .As for critic, constrained by the situation which（in which） he live, he will not fairly evaluate the value of art and for satisfying the need of people（意思不明确）. The true value of art will be ignored.

In sum, without the artist, no creature can be opened by people. Without the critic, no true value of art can be rightly appreciated by people. Thus while forming something of lasting value artists are equally important to the critics. Artists tell people where the value of art is, and critics tell people how to enter the value of art.

小结：
用了很多很复杂比较少见的形容词，这很好，但是有些会不会太冷僻
作者试图用很复杂的句型，但是有的句子结构没有整理清楚反而容易扣分