argue 习作 火箭组第二次作业

byysUID: 2294038

A 188

The author manages to illustrate that the kappa opioid is absolutely an effective painkiller for females rather males and that current medications are necessary to be reevaluated due to reported differences between the genders when experiencing pain. This assertion is reasonable at the first glance; however, it suffers several severe logical fallacies.

Firstly, it is premature to substantiate the predominant effectiveness of Kappa opioids for women merely inferred from the research. According to the argument, the pain level is estimated without any scientific means: people simply speak out their feeling, purely out of their subjective senses. It is entirely possible that women in this experiment might have a higher pain threshold physiologically while the men might be extremely sensitive to any trifling inducement. Or perhaps, admittedly women are more endurable to the pain of extracting wisdom teeth, when it comes to another kind of pain, such as the bruise, fracture or burn, the situation might be opposite.

Secondly, the recommendation of applying kappa opioids to women goes too far as soon as one notices the variety of personal cases. There might be masses of females who cannot be treated by this medication. Just one simple small pill might bring scare or even life threatening to the allergic women. What's more, infants, children or pregnant women should also be cautious to take this suggestion. Besides, even a large number of pain sufferers are physically healthy while strongly disturbed by psychological hints; thereby any medication resorting to painkiller is useless except psychotherapy.

Finally the arguer unfairly assumes all current medications is questionable, apparently rested on the report lacking any evidence to prove its authority. There is no information concerning the methodology of the report: the age group composition, the size of the samples, the proportion of men and women, or the regional distribution. Therefore, before accepting the report, it is natural for one to raise up questions; a girl in Asia might take it for granted that the result might only be suitable for the old in North America. In addition, the conclusion is impractical, especially when there are kinds of medicine uniquely suit women or men like meditation during pregnant or child birth.


This argument is not as cogent as the author stands. Unless the author prove the irreplaceable role of kappa opiods for women, the existence of a proper substitute for men and the credibility of the report, the argument can hardly be convincing and justifiable.

babyface1124UID: 2494668

188

The author manages to illustrate that the kappa opioid is absolutely an effective painkiller for females rather males and that current medications are necessary to be reevaluated due to reported differences between the genders when experiencing pain. This assertion is reasonable at the first glance; however, it suffers several severe logical fallacies.

Firstly, it is premature to substantiate the predominant effectiveness of Kappa opioids for women merely inferred from the research. According to the argument, the pain level is estimated without any scientific means: people simply speak out their feeling, purely out of their subjective senses. It is entirely possible that women in this experiment might have a higher pain threshold physiologically while the men might be extremely sensitive to any trifling inducement. Or perhaps, admittedly women are more endurable to the pain of extracting wisdom teeth, when it comes to another kind of pain, such as the bruise, fracture or burn, the situation might be opposite.

Secondly, the recommendation of applying kappa opioids to women goes too far as soon as one notices the variety of(a few) personal cases. There might be masses of females who cannot be treated by this medication. Just one simple small pill might bring scare or even life threatening to the allergic women. What's more, infants, children or pregnant women should also be cautious to take this suggestion. Besides, even a large number of pain sufferers are physically healthy while strongly disturbed by psychological hints; thereby any medication resorting to painkiller is useless except psychotherapy.

Finally the arguer unfairly assumes all current medications is questionable, apparently rested on the report lacking any evidence to prove its authority. There is no information concerning the methodology of the report: the age group composition, the size of the samples, the proportion of men and women, or the regional distribution. Therefore, before accepting the report, it is natural for one to raise up questions; a girl in Asia might take it for granted that the result might only be suitable for the old in North America. In addition, the conclusion is impractical, especially when there are kinds of medicines uniquely suit women or men like meditation during pregnant or child birth.


This argument is not as cogent as the author stands. Unless the author prove the irreplaceable role of kappa opiods for women, the existence of a proper substitute for men and the credibility of the report, (重新评估这点最好提一下)the argument can hardly be convincing and justifiable.

这篇文章写的很好！！词汇，句子连接都很不错，读来很流畅，如果例子再举得地道点就更好了。。。。值得学习~~

liapple7237UID: 2329089

The author manages to（这个词组是成功地做成某事的意思，这样和后面的逻辑矛盾） illustrate that the kappa opioid is absolutely an effective painkiller for females rather males and that current medications are necessary to be reevaluated due to reported differences between the genders when experiencing pain（很流畅，清晰，简介，值得学习）. This assertion is reasonable at the first glance; however, it suffers several severe logical fallacies.

Firstly, it is premature to substantiate the predominant effectiveness of Kappa opioids for women merely inferred from the research. According to the argument, the pain level is estimated without any scientific means: people simply speak out their feeling, purely out of their subjective senses. It is entirely possible that women in this experiment might have a higher pain threshold physiologically while the men might be extremely sensitive to any trifling inducement. Or perhaps, admittedly women are more endurable to the pain of extracting wisdom teeth, when it comes to another kind of pain, such as the bruise, fracture or burn, the situation might be opposite.

Secondly, the recommendation of applying kappa opioids to women goes too far as soon as one notices the variety of personal cases. There might be masses of females who cannot be treated by(with) this medication. Just one simple small pill might bring scare or even life threatening to the allergic women. What's more, infants, children or pregnant women should also be cautious to take this suggestion. Besides, even a large number of pain sufferers are physically healthy while strongly disturbed by psychological hints; thereby any medication resorting to painkiller is useless except psychotherapy. (此段的观点很独到，而且有说服力，值得学习)

Finally the arguer unfairly assumes all current medications is questionable, apparently rested on the report lacking any evidence to prove its authority. There is no information concerning the methodology of the report: the age group composition, the size of the samples, the proportion of men and women, or the regional distribution（并列的很好）. Therefore, before accepting the report, it is natural for one to raise up questions; a girl in Asia might take it for granted that the result might only be suitable for the old in North America. In addition, the conclusion is impractical, especially when there are kinds of medicine uniquely suit women or men like meditation during pregnant or child birth.


This argument is not as cogent as the author stands. Unless the author prove the irreplaceable role of kappa opiods for women, the existence of a proper substitute for men and the credibility of the report, the argument can hardly be convincing and justifiable.
观点明确，语句流畅，用词精炼，句式多样，是一篇很好的文章，值得好好学习。看来作者的单词很过关哦~~~~